NeedToUseYou
Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005 From: None of your business Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: meatcleaver quote:
ORIGINAL: pahunkboy No. Big business exploits what they can. The wealthy top 1% of the world rule- owe no allegience to any flag. In effect- we live in a corporation. The wealthy 1% are almost never photographed- they can collapse a currency- run a stock up- by politicians and in fact write legislation. [no oversight] On the horizen, corporation vs corporation. Walmart vs big oil. Every penny gas goes up = so many million $ in lost revenue. At the same time record oil profits. [obsceen] So expect this. Taking the ball and going home. Let me clarify. "they" dont want the individual to buy rxs from Canada as it isnt "safe". Yet big corporations can harvest the cheapest labor and materials. He who has the gold- makes the rules. Add in the bought media. It isnt going to bite the mastas hand. If more money is made via PEACE vs WAR, we would be at peace. If more cash can be made by selliing gas to China, dont expect allegience to America. A corporations sole reason for existing is to profit shareholders; Not better the greater good. Be that as it may; Americans, which is a nation of peoples from every corner of the globe; is creative and inovative. It wasnt smoke and mirrors. I want to add; America being great; does not diminish other countries from also being great! What you are describing is capitalism. It seems to me to be promoted by more than the top 1% when the going is good, when the going gets tough, people seem to blame the top 1% everything. The problem is that the way the world is is how the majority wanted it to be because they thought they would make on it. How the world is run now was entirely predictable and people voted for it. Why do you think we are capitalist? We are more psuedo capitalist/socialist depending on the situation. For example, big corps like to be socialist(merging of government and corporations), when it is domestic, as in grants, tax incentives,surrounding area improvements, tax deferals, etc. , that is undeniably anti-capitalistic, and would fall closer to the socialist model. Then when it comes to global trade they like to be completely capitalistic, as in want tarriff free trade, want low restrictions, cheap labor. So, the big corps beg for government support at home(US supported corporations=socialism), but decry socialism when exporting jobs. The problem is the system is the worst mixture of the two models, it sucks from the government when ever it can(socialist concept=government mixing with industry), but doesn't give back anything for that support(or very little), and when it can save a buck it decries the evils of socialism and wants capitalism. That is the problem big mega-corps are simply playing off the schizophrenia of the US populace, that for some reason believe they can have socialist policies and at the same time play capitalism. It doesn't work, because a purely socialist model would not be exporting work to china for example to build widgets. And a purely capitalist based system would not be supporting these industries. It is my belief if we had socialism or capitalism in a much purer form it would work out better. As is we have the worst of both systems at play. I'm speaking in an industry by industry regard. IMO.
|