CatKnight
Posts: 37
Joined: 8/31/2007 Status: offline
|
Thanks everyone for your comments and general advice. I appreciate it! I'm not in the least worried about the specific situations I described. I only mentioned them as the first time I felt that way. The safeword use was simple disagreement on what it meant. "Yellow" means that something is not emergent/a limit hasn't been reached, but we need to stop and reassess. I took it to mean a minor problem like a restraint too tight. She took it to cover the whole gamut - including being a bit bored with the activity. So that gets down to communication and technique. Similarly, freeing herself wasn't really a conscious act - and tying her probably wasn't the most brilliant move I could make. As Celeste says, there are potential hazards even if I'm right there next to her. That comes down to learning knots, technique and putting some thought into what I want my "role" to be like. THAT is where my problem lies. I imagine ending up being some domineering, cruel SOB... and that isn't what I want for us. Interestingly, the thread around here somewhere about 'kind' masters had some valuable advice for me. Solar - your advice is very valuable. I'm still trying to figure out what she wants. From what she tells me it seems to be more along the lines of the quiet, obedient type. Yet I know her. She is free with her opinions and not always the best at authority. As for me, I'm certainly fine with leading, but it's not quite as Celeste suggested - 'getting a lick of ice cream and having it taken away' - it's more a dread of going too far with my expectations. Yes, I know. Communicate. More on that in a bit. Full: You pretty much had the same reaction I did to that statement. I know what "roleplaying" is. That's fine for a given scene or when you're intentionally trying something new. We're drifting into a more permanent power exchange though, and that's not a roleplay. Sir Cache: I agree entirely when you say not to act out of anger. It was the first thing she taught me, and I couldn't agree more. I'm not even sure I'm worried about acting out of anger, so much as..hm. So much as that if I'm in charge, I have to be right. Which is insane. Lady Hugs: Oh, she didn't untie herself to deal with an emergency. She was half asleep, did it unconsciously and went to sleep. Certainly I wouldn't consider leaving someone bound and alone, or denying them basic necessities. Red: Well...*I* am new. She is not. She has 20 years experience on me. Which on the one hand leaves me in awe, and the other hand makes me well..insecure. Very insecure. Especially since she seems to be upping the stakes. Usually communication is our strong point. You're absolutely right though - it failed here. My fault. I was so caught up in my worries I didn't share my doubts about what she was proposing. I suppose I didn't want to worry her. Pretty much right after I wrote the above post I wrote HER, trying to pin down exactly what she was proposing, how she imagined the resulting shift in power and so forth. She didn't really answer, so I pinned her down in IMs and expressed my doubts about pulling this off. I asked her what she thought *I* should expect, and what she wanted out of this. At the time she offered to 'take over' for a few weeks so I'd have a better idea of what such a power exchange would look like. I agreed, but looking at tonight's conversation we seem to have instinctively shifted right back. Still, it's enough to work with for the moment I think. I think my main keys now are to decide what "I" will expect - and what tone (gentle, stern, etc.) and therefore tricks to make it happen.
|