ocilla
Posts: 1764
Joined: 6/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact I'm going to put in My two cents here, even though My rambling probably isn't going to live up to the value of a penny. Above, it was mentioned that it is a matter of definition. I couldn't agree more with that. I have a submissive who does happen to be married. Even further, he happens to be a member of the military. To some, that would equate to him having two owners who come before Me. In truth, on these very boards, I've said I would never (We all know those statements come back to haunt Us) take a submissive who was in this situation. I mention that because I certainly understand those who wouldn't consider doing it. Yet, by the definition of the dynamic, I consider him owned. He considers himself owned. No one challenges the fact that he's owned. In the local and extended BDSM community, he's been accepted as being My submissive, My boy, and is known as that. I could take all day explaining all the little details of how it works, what the limits are, and the boundries that it entails, but if you'd prefer the short answer........ He's owned. Hey Lady Pact, I think if I were married as are you that such an arrangement as you have would be workable for me. But without a separate emotional realtionship that is fairly stable and satisfying - whether vanilla or not - I do not find having a married or partnered sub as mine satisfying enough - I would have a hard time sharing in such a situation. And as to a slave.., can a person who is in committed marriage or partnership with another that is thier primary be my slave? be owned by me? No - the D/s dynamic would not be that complete for me in such a situation.
_____________________________
Ocilla Nature is not a place to visit. It is home. ~ Gary Snyder It takes a kinky village...
|