|
Prinsexx -> RE: BDSM, sexual or not? (9/28/2007 4:55:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sammiebabygirl
This is my first official post, not counting my introduction and it is something i have thought of and discussed often. i hear it all the time, especially from female subs that it is NOT sexual for them.
Welcome sammiebaby....I was a first poster such a short time ago and now I feel like an old girl already as everyone welcpmed me here so well....so welcome welcome also....my personal opinion is that it is ALL sexual but on a continuum like sometimes the sex is overt to the point of climax and somwtimes covert beneath the guise of service or dominaion but that's like a build up of energy and the climax might come later....
I am mostly submissive to men in as much as i cannot (never say never0 be topped by a woman...I have a new Dom and yes I love Him whether he loves me or not and yes it is sexual but only if it is sexual for him as I serve him right? but i love to be dominant to women, actually very picky and have a certain 'type' but when I am dominant it's usually not overtly sexual for me as I feel the sense of responsibility and control dynamic is more important than the climax......
anyone saying it's not sexual in bdsm is to me a little like a priest saying he's not sexual (apologies to priests here ok) when there is a narrow band definition of what sex is ie sexual intercourse as penetration....what I mean is if it floats your boat, makes you gloat, feeds your goat whatever whatever it's sexual...........and I'll take on all comers who want to argue with me as I'm in that sort of mood............
Prinnie xx
|
|
|
|
