Pyrrsefanie
Posts: 1222
Joined: 9/18/2007 From: NEW HAMPSHAAAAAAH! Status: offline
|
I think that the main difference between "ethical sadism" and the sadism so commonly associated with mass murderers is that ethical sadism is something that has been tamed. The person in question has come to terms with the fact that the beast is in there, recognizes that society and common sense dictate control over said beast, and as a result can keep themselves in check. They are in a right state of mind, they can say "This is going too far," or barring that, can rein the beast back in when a negative indication from their partner is given. Going to steal a song title here and refer to them as "Super Sadists," a.k.a. Jeffrey Dahmer and BTK, did not exhibit control over their beast. Clearly they knew it was there, but never put forth the effort to control it, society and morals be damned. They lacked that internal compass, or on/off switch that sent the warning signals when things got too crazy, and as a result, their sadism was an addiction running rampant. What started off as just a little bit soon was not enough to satiate their appetites, and eventually it became completely unchecked and ended in lots of dead and/or half-eaten people. Just on a hunch I'm going to say that about 99% of the people here, yourself included, are individuals of good moral standing who know the difference between right and wrong, and therefore no matter how often the beast is let out, it's always on a short leash. In my opinion there is little to no danger of having to "up the ante," so to speak, when it comes to sadistic play.
|