LadiesBladewing
Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: anthrosub I'm glad to see this topic being discussed as I've thought about it myself many times. I know of two profiles here where the Domme is genuinely looking to own a slave. But as the OP asks, there's no mention at all of what provisions would be made or how future security will be established. In my view, if I'm going to involve myself to that level, I would be very concerned about what will come down the road. I've also spoken with a few Dommes over the past couple years where it was obvious once we started talking on the phone that this was not being thought about at all. anthrosub As one of the dominant individuals who takes more than a little time caring for the concerns of our property, including their health, and their financial well-being, I can tell you that we don't give specifics about whether or how we're going to take fiscal responsibility for our property in our profile for a -very- good reason. Aside from the fact that plans are individualized according to the individual servant, I don't think that many people would post their financial profile for anyone to read, and we don't and won't post our financial plans on our profile. Financial matters are discussed with the individual servant, at the point at which he or she becomes a bound servant, and the complete responsibility of the House. It is my opinion that any dominant individual who would post his or her financial plan for property in hir profile needs to understand the nature of the internet better or is missing common sense and a sense of self-preservation. We don't even take on submissives who can't fully support themselves at the start of the relationship, because no servant is accepted into the house without a lot of time and patience to see whether the fit is really -right-. TPE (we use other terms, but I will use this one for continuity), for us, includes the right to tell our servant to continue to work outside the home, at our discretion. This gives all of us plenty of time to grow together and learn about each other, AND it allows the servant to retain the knowledge that he or she can truly -choose- whether or not a life with us is the right one for hir. So the servant must be able to hold down a job outside of the House and be able to support hirself until such time as the decision is made to take a servant to the level of bonded servant. At that point, all matters of finance, medical care, life insurance, and management of life issues are dealt with, since at that point, the individual becomes fully a core member of the House. Oh--and marriage isn't an option for us in ANY state in the United States. Even if they could get past the same-sex issues, no State recognizes (or will recognize any time in the near future) multi-partner (aka polyamorous) relationships. Because of this, we've had to find other legal methods for dealing with protecting the members of our household. Because of this, I think we may have had to put -more- thought into this than many married couples do, and I'm pretty sure that we've covered areas that most married people leave up to their insurance agent or the company who handles their employer's group life policy. Lady Zephyr
< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 10/11/2005 5:19:45 PM >
|