AAkasha -> RE: Serious Long Distance? (10/7/2007 1:23:13 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kyraofMists A quick google search on Australia and Immigration gave me this link to the Department of Immigration quote:
ORIGINAL: xoxi Also...I can not imagine waiting a year or two, committed to someone who I can't be with physically, before I can even kiss that person. I wouldn't even know what I was committing to! Would it be so bad just to jump right in and fly over...I mean the worst that can happen is I'll end up moving home. Or even staying in a new country...I've been wanting to leave the States for awhile now [8D] I think there is nothing wrong with flying over for a visit; however I think it is very unwise to move there without following the proper procedures for immigration. I know that Canada has refused to even admit people into their country that didn't have a date and means to leave the country within a set amount of time. Since submitting my application for permanent residency, I have been under much more scrutiny when I try to visit the country. They want to make very sure that I am not trying to move there before I actually have governmental permission. If you are serious about having a long term relationship with this person, why would you want to move there and then live with the threat of deportation and not having the ability to live there legally? *edited to add... If you do visit, be prepared to face more detailed questioning on why you are there since you have met over the internet. I wouldn't recommend lying about how you met either. There have been a couple of times that I was pulled aside for more extensive questioning becausee we met on the internet. My luggage and computer have been searched and they have even called him to make sure that my story was accurate. Knight's Kyra Yes, this is what pissed me off about the entire immigration thing. I went to Canada to briefly meet him, and I got semi grilled by immigration about who I was meeting there and what my romantic interests were, and whether I intended to stay. I said no, I just was meeting someone but had no intentions of staying in Canada. When he came to the US, he got the same grilling of questions. He was scheduled to stay here about a week. We knew already we were going to get married, but I wanted a lengthy engagement. We began talking to an immigration attorney about what we needed to do. We decided he would go back to Canada, collect some things, say goodbye to his friends and family and return to get a job via a work sponsor or whatever it required. Our attorney told us he was taking a huge risk returning to Canada, turning around, and then coming back with any amount of "stuff" - even the short turaround would be suspicious. He would be asked if he had romantic intentions and intended to stay, and why the quick trip, why the need to get more stuff. If he lied to immigration, he could be forced to leave and not allowed back in for something like 10 years. We were told he had to go back to Canada to file for necessary visas, work permits, or a fiance visa and wait - all the options were totally unreasonable and required paperwork, possible denials, and ridiculous time periods that we could not see each other. Further, because he did not have a degree specialization considered "in need" in the USA, we'd have to go through a lengthy sponsor/work VISA process that required proof that the job could not be filled by a US citizen. Every single option pointed to a lot of waiting, paperwork, and the inability to see each other in the meantime. This was a depressing wake up call, because I had thought Canada - to - USA immigration should be a snap - he was a good citizen, had a university degree, and wasn't coming here to freeload. Our least painful option was to just get married while he was here under the tourist visa, which rushed it and didn't allow a long engagement, but we pretty much knew about 5 hours after we met in person that we were going to get married. We ended up having a more formal wedding a year later, but our actual marriage was done in court with just a few people present less than three months after we met face to face. Akasha
|
|
|
|