unsung
Posts: 183
Joined: 12/23/2006 Status: offline
|
In response to all the insight provided, the results of taking your advice or not and applying it. This morning I expressed my concern about being nervous meeting this man for an entire weekend in a hotel when in fact we 'have never met in person', expressing that I was not at comfort 'jumping in with both feet', that I would be in his city on the weekend and was more than willing to meet at a public place that happens to be a lifestyle event. He seemingly agreed temporarily and asked for the wanking story from me that he could make come real if I wished. I am sure he could although at this time redundant. Then asked me if I had been masturbating thinking of him, as when people are apart 'masturbation is something we do'. My thoughts were 'we have not even been together'. So he ended the correspondence with me stating that 'the ONE that would be would know without question or concern, and that obviously I was not for him and him not for me'. So where do you draw the line? Red flag # 1: day 3 being told I would not question his validity as a Dominant Oh there were others, and I don't discredit him as a Dominant, I just don't believe his tactics were a class act. For someone he will be.......... but not for me. Again thank you everyone for your feedback. CutieMouse: I want to respond to this that you pointed out in my profile.... "He is understanding enough to know that life's realities do exist beyond fantasies, and that fantasies do have the power to become reality with the foundation of trust and mutual respect." The essence of that statement and what makes it work is in the last part of the sentence, not the first (the first keeps the focus of fantasy in reality to developing a bond). It is drawing the line between developing a relationship and then traversing further into our desires if in fact the foundation of trust and mutual respect are attained. The focus is that later part of the statement not the first. If in fact the interpretation is on the first part, obviously I am going to have the same question of the dominant that I have posed in my question to this board. Call it a trick statement if you wish, it is a play on words and a method in which to see if someone is really insync with what I seek. Part of my screening process if I may, and I can. LA: I will discard your comments because they are based on purely assumption, and are far from an accurate statement or assessment. But somehow do find the heart to say thanks for them anyhow.
< Message edited by unsung -- 10/10/2007 10:16:41 AM >
|