CuriousLord
Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007 Status: offline
|
Smarter people tend to be those better at things in general. A smarter person is more likely than a less intelligent person to have particular common skills, such as spelling. Therefore, while it's entirely plausible for a genius to have wretched spelling, or for a retarded person to have pretty fair spelling, there's a statistical corelation. Point being, if you see someone who spells below par, it's probable that their intelligence is sub par. I've seen a lot of people saying the "It doesn't matter, because that's not always true!"-sort of thing, but, meh. It does matter, if you care to spend your time on an arbitrary individual, why not spend them with an otherwise-arbitrary person who is likely to be have more intelligence? (Assuming intelligence is your thing.) So, yeah. Spelling matters. I'm typically one of the first to knock it as a zero-order mental feat, largely being little more than memorization, but, hey, even that's indicative of some sort of mental proficiency. The grammar accompanying that spelling can be argued for as a first-order feat, so the two together can be telling. PS- One should also keep in mind that some people use spell check, so perfect spelling cases- those cases which, despite length, lack typos or so- might be tossed as not actually an indication of spelling but use of a program.
< Message edited by CuriousLord -- 10/24/2007 12:17:58 AM >
|