RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


FirmhandKY -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 11:54:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

She is going to ignore facts, logic, and anything else and either accuse you of calling her names or use Anne Coulter as a source for facts.  Pointless, you couldn't convince her the world was round if Fox announced it was flat.  I wonder how old she thinks the world is and I bet she thinks evolution is a wacky theory.


I would say "pot, kettle, black", except that would be insulting to pinkme2, saying she has "ignored facts, logic, and anything else".

Quite the contrary, SM, she has stayed focused and on point, while you and your compatriots have wondered around the Elysium fields of dreams and fantasy.

She hasn't ignored any pertinent facts.

Her logic is impeccable ... if you bother to read it.

She hasn't called you a name.  You've called her several or implied several insults in your posts.

She didn't use Ann Coulter as a source. (straw man)

She's made no claim that the world is flat (another straw man on your part)

You've managed to insult her (possible) religious beliefs - without even knowing what her beliefs actually are.

Just on style and class alone, she wins this one hand's down.  [:D]

Firm




meatcleaver -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:02:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

FB- The pullout of Saudia Arabia wasn't a capitulation to Bin Laden.  Not all the troops were removed, and it was done for other reasons.  If you like, I even have an actual news link on the information.  Any troop reconfiguration or pull-out, by your reasoning could be attributed to capitulation. That's not logical nor reasonable.  


I bet troop withdrawals from Vietnam wasn't an admission of defeat either.

Hell, we Brits let you win the revolutionary war because we had an empire to build and you lot were just too damn stroppy for us to take  you along with us.




farglebargle -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:26:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

Or even keeping under the strict Don't Ask, Don't Tell restrictions required of other homosexuals in the service of the US requiring them to avoid joint-ownership of real-estate assets with their partners?



Last one stll holding their breath by the time FB actually provides proof of that one, wins....[:D]


Oh, you don't consider owning a house to be evidence of something to be further investigated under the tenants of DADT?

Now, that is, as I understand DADT, pretty much one of the criteria. Not engaging in an Homosexual Relationship.

Playing house together sounds pretty gay to me.




farglebargle -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:29:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

No, I'm not saying that at all. I said we haven't pulled troops out of Iraq. Like I said, parsing words. To prove what exactly?


IRAQ?

I wasn't talking about Iraq. I was talking about Bush being a piece-of-shit coward and Terrorist Appeaser.

Why is giving in, again, in Iraq this time any different than Bush giving in to Bin Ladin re: US Troops in Saudi Arabia.

The US has *already* shown it doesn't have any balls standing up to terrorists.

What's the point of pretending differently at this late juncture?





farglebargle -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:33:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Are we our brothers keeper?


Translation:

Is "our brother" your slave?

Free People don't have " keepers", so the implication is that you've enslaved the other.




stef -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:39:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Oh, you don't consider owning a house to be evidence of something to be further investigated under the tenants of DADT?

Now, that is, as I understand DADT, pretty much one of the criteria. Not engaging in an Homosexual Relationship.

Playing house together sounds pretty gay to me.

That's because you're either grossly ignorant, reaching to try and make a point or some combination of the two.  I've owned a house with other people before.  It hardly means I was in a relationship, sexual or otherwise, with any of them.

~stef




farglebargle -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:43:25 PM)

Well. the DoD investigators would surely take a closer look to see what's the exact story. And therein is the point. Why should Condi get a pass, that $AVERAGE_SOLDIER doesn't get? Because she's rich, and went to the right schools, and has connections?

Yeah, that's fucking fair.

You know, when the troops finally realize how much the Administration *really* fucking hates them, the entire emerging empire is truly and thoroughly fucked. "Beware the fury of the Legions" The legions are fine, even with the 60% of Americans who disagree with "The Mission". It's when they really accept the idea that Bush is just using them ( and really cares more about the Hired Mercenaries, than the troops) they're going to look around for their own, new Commander -in -Chief.

Caesars aren't necessarily made in DC...





Alumbrado -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:44:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

Or even keeping under the strict Don't Ask, Don't Tell restrictions required of other homosexuals in the service of the US requiring them to avoid joint-ownership of real-estate assets with their partners?



Last one stll holding their breath by the time FB actually provides proof of that one, wins....[:D]


Oh, you don't consider owning a house to be evidence of something to be further investigated under the tenants of DADT?

Now, that is, as I understand DADT, pretty much one of the criteria. Not engaging in an Homosexual Relationship.

Playing house together sounds pretty gay to me.



You said that under DADT, those in government service were restricted from co-owning property... pure BS, so now you are changing from 'required' to 'investigate'.

How about you back up your original assertion?




farglebargle -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:48:22 PM)

"f you're not a total fucking moron, and don't want to get caught, then you better not fucking co-own property with your lover, because that's one of the indicators of you being engaged in homosexual activity, in violation of the regs, used to justify a through investigation of your personal and private life. It's ludicrous that Condi doesn't have to play the same games because of her being wealthy, and well connected, while kids dying for her do."

That better?




stef -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:53:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

Well. the DoD investigators would surely take a closer look to see what's the exact story. And therein is the point. Why should Condi get a pass, that $AVERAGE_SOLDIER doesn't get? Because she's rich, and went to the right schools, and has connections?

Yeah, that's fucking fair.

"Fair" has nothing to do with it.  The fact that she's not, and has never been in the military, and therefore not subject to DADT, might have something to do with it.

~stef




Alumbrado -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 12:54:58 PM)

quote:

That better?



'Better' that you want a homophobic policy applied to all government employees?

No, DADT is a piece of crap even when you finally describe it accurately.




pinkme2 -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:11:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2
No, you said she wasn't sophisticated enough. You didn't actually state any factual information.


You see a newspaper recently? The entire Iraq Fabrication happened under her Watch as the NSA, and the whole Fucked Up Occupation is happening on her watch as Secretary of State. I don't know what facts *I* need to offer given her proven incompetence.

Wait a sec!  I thought the entire Iraq war was all on Bush!  Which is it?  Furthermore, I disagree that Iraq is as fucked up as you believe.  I do dislike the State Department's interference in military ops, but since I'm not in the loop on what exactly goes on in Condi's office, I'm not going to assume things. 

It's your assertion about Condi, you prove it. 

You know, we at times hardly know truth in our own relationships, even in court cases, but in this, you're 100 percent sure that IT'S ALL HER FAULT.  Umm.. right.  Again, I'm not thrilled with the State dept. but I'm tired of this arm-chair blaming by those who have no clue about anything.





quote:

I'm amazed you'd be so poorly informed of current events that you would require any evidence of her incompetence.

Oh, another person who calls everyone who disagrees with them ignorant. 


quote:

Why shouldn't she be held to the same standards as anyone in US Government Service?

So you are lumping the military in with civilian requirements?  Perhaps Condi needs to have a PT test too? 

There are reasons that the military plays by different rules.  I hate the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, and if you ask nicely, I may tell you why.
quote:

If you'll discriminate against a soldier for being gay, you'll discriminate against the Secretary of State for being gay.

It's not about discrimination.  Try again.  And the military is held to very different standards.  Ever serve?
quote:

Since she's obviously hiding intentionally, it's sad to see her failing one of the most basic tenants of Don't Ask, Don't Tell.

Do you even understand that policy?  What is it about?  What does it mean for our troops?

quote:

But of course, given her track record, who would expect competence from her?

How well do you know her?  I would never presume to judge a person's qualifications from news articles.  But then I don't prejudge others.






pinkme2 -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:17:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

FB- The pullout of Saudia Arabia wasn't a capitulation to Bin Laden. Not all the troops were removed, and it was done for other reasons.


Well, let's analyze this.

Bin Ladin demanded the Troops out of Saudi Arabia.

Actually, I believe he mentioned something about pulling the troops out of all Muslim lands. 

quote:

The troops are out of Saudi Arabia.

Not all of them.  But mostly, yes.  Do you think that's a bad thing? 

quote:

Spin it however you want to,

Well, since I'm interested in truth and not simply in anti-American lies,  it's easy to see what really happened.
quote:

but the straight truth is that Bush Gave Into Bin Ladin's Demands. If Bush had balls, he wouldn't have removed the troops from Saudi Arabia, SPECIFICALLY because it was one of Bin Ladin's demands.

Riiiiight.  Refrain from doing the right thing because it'd be contrary to something that Bin Laden once said.  That'd be allowing the terrorists to control us just as much as anything.  So you really believe this drivel you are spouting or are you just being bitchy?

quote:

It is when you do it AFTER you've been threatened.

He's been threatening us for a long time.  I look first for the real reasons for the pull out instead of the conspiracy ones.  What if Bin Laden tells us that he'll attack unless we stay out of N. Korea.  Should we then invade N Korea??





mnottertail -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:18:04 PM)

RE: Condi's incompetence:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0326-10.htm

of course it is a slanted view, you are hardly going to find it on some rush limbaugh site............but I gotta tell you, there it is, find counterclaims if you can.

It ain't like it is just Condi, the whole fuckoree is pretty incompetent.

Like this fuckwad Brown that was head of FEMA---LOL, now he is a disaster consultant.........for the purpose of setting up and enlarging the scope of disasters or what?

Ron




SimplyMichael -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:25:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Guys,

She is going to ignore facts, logic, and anything else and either accuse you of calling her names or use Anne Coulter as a source for facts.  Pointless, you couldn't convince her the world was round if Fox announced it was flat.  I wonder how old she thinks the world is and I bet she thinks evolution is a wacky theory.


KY,   Find someone who has a grasp of syntax and is more familiar with future tense than you are.  Also, don't you think it a bit sad hiding behind a woman rather than attempting to match wits with me directly?

quote:

  Her logic is impeccable ... if you bother to read it.


Believe me, it was a bother to read it and I am sure it seems impeccable to you.  However, I see flaws you can drive a Humvee through as could your average college freshman. 

Oh, and as for the Elysium fields, they are quite nice this year although I understand they are going to drilled for oil next year and a walmart is going in.




pinkme2 -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:33:11 PM)

Thanks for the well thought out answer, Philo.
quote:

Firstly, stop the support of Israel......put them in a situation where they have to use diplomacy to get along with their neighbours instead of being able to rely on US funded force.

A few questions relating to this one.  First: What do you think will happen once we pull our support?  Second: They share our values and type of government and have supported us as well.  Don't you think that by pulling our support, we'll be lending morale support to those that wish for their destruction?  Don't you think other allies in other areas will then mistrust us as well? (I guess that was a 2 part question.lol)
quote:

 Secondly, the middle east only has the imprtance is does to the West because of oil. So time to go to alternative sources of energy.

You are aware that only 12 percent of the US's oil is from the ME?  We're able to do without.  Now, I realize you said "west".  Europe uses a far larger percentage of ME oil and so is more dependent.  But in all honesty, that's something for them to work out. 
quote:

Thirdly, encourage all nations to sign up to some form of universal human rights standard, and then stick to it........if your ally breaks the code they stop being your ally. In other words, occupy the moral high ground.

Well, it's called the UN, it's corrupt and Nations most likely to use inhumane treatment are on the councils overseeing others.  Signing a paper doesn't guarantee a whole lot.  The whole idea sounds good, but the reality doesn't work.  I for one do not want my Nation to give up soveriegnty to some other "World" council.  I don't want my leaders or soldiers judged by a potentially corrupt "world court".  I imagine that citizens of other nations feel the same.

quote:

Fourthly, this is not just advice for US foreign policy, it applies to all nations.

I like this part, even if I disagree with the others.  Often we get constantly slammed with accusations, most of which are minor compared to what happens in other nations.  I'm glad we have standards, but it becomes an American-bashing contest.  Bah.

quote:

In essence, get our noses out from where they don't belong.

Some of your points would put our noses deep into the business of other nations.  How do you guarantee humane treatment (and who defines that?) without oversight? 
quote:

The middle east will not solve its problems by the efforts of one country alone....

Personally I don't think the ME, Asia, Africa, or umm.. Russia can ever be less fucked up. 
quote:

because all nations are too self interested.

As they should be.
quote:

Just as in our own countries we have to abide by Law in order to co-exist, so international relations must be governed by Law.

But what law?  Who administers it?  That's the issue.  We get charges of corrupt law in all countries.  But somehow on an international scale it's going to be immune?  Remember the Oil for food program?  That's just one example of the UN and it's work. Other than the vaccination program, I can't think of anything the UN does well. 

Are you speaking of a need for a different organization?




SimplyMichael -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:33:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

FB- The pullout of Saudia Arabia wasn't a capitulation to Bin Laden. Not all the troops were removed, and it was done for other reasons.


Well, let's analyze this.

Bin Ladin demanded the Troops out of Saudi Arabia.

Actually, I believe he mentioned something about pulling the troops out of all Muslim lands. 
You can "believe" in fairies all you want but it doesn't make them real.  A major tenent of Al Queda is all infidels out of the holy land of Mecca and Saudi Arabia.  Google it and educate yourself like the rest of us.

quote:

The troops are out of Saudi Arabia.

Not all of them.  But mostly, yes.  Do you think that's a bad thing? 

quote:

Spin it however you want to,

Well, since I'm interested in truth and not simply in anti-American lies,  it's easy to see what really happened.

Clearly it is more difficult than you imagine

quote:

but the straight truth is that Bush Gave Into Bin Ladin's Demands. If Bush had balls, he wouldn't have removed the troops from Saudi Arabia, SPECIFICALLY because it was one of Bin Ladin's demands.

Riiiiight.  Refrain from doing the right thing because it'd be contrary to something that Bin Laden once said.  That'd be allowing the terrorists to control us just as much as anything.  So you really believe this drivel you are spouting or are you just being bitchy?
"bitchy"?  I take it his is you being logical and having an intelligent discussion?

quote:

It is when you do it AFTER you've been threatened.

He's been threatening us for a long time.  I look first for the real reasons for the pull out instead of the conspiracy ones.  What if Bin Laden tells us that he'll attack unless we stay out of N. Korea.  Should we then invade N Korea??

Clearly you need to keep looking, why not read something more substantial than that nut Coulter, how about Foreign Affairs or something else vetted by professionals?




Bitchy eh?  I guess that is the class that KY was refering to.




pinkme2 -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:36:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

FB- The pullout of Saudia Arabia wasn't a capitulation to Bin Laden.  Not all the troops were removed, and it was done for other reasons.  If you like, I even have an actual news link on the information.  Any troop reconfiguration or pull-out, by your reasoning could be attributed to capitulation. That's not logical nor reasonable.  


I bet troop withdrawals from Vietnam wasn't an admission of defeat either.

Hell, we Brits let you win the revolutionary war because we had an empire to build and you lot were just too damn stroppy for us to take  you along with us.

How about you stick to the topic at hand?  Because in order to debate you back, I have to unravel yet another ignorant statement.  Then I can get back to the original point.  Try staying with me here... taking troops out of Saudi Arabia because we no longer needed to patrol the Iraqi no-fly zone corresponds with... what again?  Vietnam?  How?




pinkme2 -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:39:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

RE: Condi's incompetence:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0326-10.htm

of course it is a slanted view, you are hardly going to find it on some rush limbaugh site............but I gotta tell you, there it is, find counterclaims if you can.

It ain't like it is just Condi, the whole fuckoree is pretty incompetent.

Like this fuckwad Brown that was head of FEMA---LOL, now he is a disaster consultant.........for the purpose of setting up and enlarging the scope of disasters or what?

Ron


Find a balanced article. One that gives facts not presented in a biased light and leaving out others.




SimplyMichael -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/30/2007 2:42:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinkme2

Thanks for the well thought out answer, Philo.
quote:

Firstly, stop the support of Israel......put them in a situation where they have to use diplomacy to get along with their neighbours instead of being able to rely on US funded force.

A few questions relating to this one.  First: What do you think will happen once we pull our support?  Second: They share our values and type of government and have supported us as well.  Don't you think that by pulling our support, we'll be lending morale support to those that wish for their destruction?  Don't you think other allies in other areas will then mistrust us as well? (I guess that was a 2 part question.lol)

My values don't include bulldozing people's houses and then standing around bewildered why they might want to kill me.  I would take the Israelis over the arabs any day but at the same time the Jews shouldn't look at warsaw ghettos and be shocked that they people want to kill the ones wearing jack boots.

quote:

 Secondly, the middle east only has the imprtance is does to the West because of oil. So time to go to alternative sources of energy.

You are aware that only 12 percent of the US's oil is from the ME?  We're able to do without.  Now, I realize you said "west".  Europe uses a far larger percentage of ME oil and so is more dependent.  But in all honesty, that's something for them to work out. 

Thanks for so clearly demonstrating your grasp of capitalism and how markets work, GLOBAL markets....

quote:

Thirdly, encourage all nations to sign up to some form of universal human rights standard, and then stick to it........if your ally breaks the code they stop being your ally. In other words, occupy the moral high ground.

Well, it's called the UN, it's corrupt and Nations most likely to use inhumane treatment are on the councils overseeing others.  Signing a paper doesn't guarantee a whole lot.  The whole idea sounds good, but the reality doesn't work.  I for one do not want my Nation to give up soveriegnty to some other "World" council.  I don't want my leaders or soldiers judged by a potentially corrupt "world court".  I imagine that citizens of other nations feel the same.

First it was what you "believe" to be true and now it is your "imagination" but most countries DO believe in the ICC.  As for "Nations most likely to use inhumane treatment are on the councils overseeing others." the irony is rather funny but is obviously lost on you.

quote:

Fourthly, this is not just advice for US foreign policy, it applies to all nations.

I like this part, even if I disagree with the others.  Often we get constantly slammed with accusations, most of which are minor compared to what happens in other nations.  I'm glad we have standards, but it becomes an American-bashing contest.  Bah.

quote:

In essence, get our noses out from where they don't belong.

Some of your points would put our noses deep into the business of other nations.  How do you guarantee humane treatment (and who defines that?) without oversight? 
quote:

The middle east will not solve its problems by the efforts of one country alone....

Personally I don't think the ME, Asia, Africa, or umm.. Russia can ever be less fucked up. 
quote:

because all nations are too self interested.

As they should be.
quote:

Just as in our own countries we have to abide by Law in order to co-exist, so international relations must be governed by Law.

But what law?  Who administers it?  That's the issue.  We get charges of corrupt law in all countries.  But somehow on an international scale it's going to be immune?  Remember the Oil for food program?  That's just one example of the UN and it's work. Other than the vaccination program, I can't think of anything the UN does well. 

Are you speaking of a need for a different organization?

The rest is just too funny to bother with.




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875