|
herfacechair -> RE: An example of why our military loves the press .... (10/29/2007 2:47:02 PM)
|
SimplyMIchael: Bush has close ties to Bin Laudin and is therefore a terrorist and the Republican party has close to ties to white supremicists and thus are all racists, course you probably know about the latter.
Not true.
The reality is that members of the Bush family had some business dealings with members of the Bin Ladin family, NOT with Osama Bin Laden himself.
As for your statement about Republicans having “close ties” with white supremacists, again that’s not true.
Some members of the Republican party, as are some members of the Democratic party, had ties with white supremacists.
Here’s a tidbit you should remember. A greater percentage of the Republican Party supported the Civil Rights Act (approx. 80%) compared to the percentage of Democrats that supported that act (approx. 62%)
SimplyMIchael: Oh, and as for Raygun winning the cold war, Kennen said of that thought "intrinsically silly and childish" which seems an apt description of the followers of Bush today.
Reagan’s policies DID end the Cold War. He knew that the Soviet Economy couldn’t support their system. All he had to do was economically strangle their inefficient economy, while pressuring them with a military buildup.
They needed that economy to sustain their military machine.
The Soviet’s knew that. They’d passed us up in military strength before Reagan became president, and they were at capacity in terms of being able to support that buildup.
Reagan forced them to go past breaking point by maintaining their military buildup at great expense to their economy. He did that by expanding our military. He made things hard on them by chocking them economically.
The end result? They collapsed. It started with the breaking down of the Berlin Wall, and liberation of Soviet Block countries. And ended when the Soviet Union disintegrated.
There are allot of people in the former Soviet Block countries that love Ronald Reagan for what he did.
SimplyMIchael: And of course not a single answer to any of my rather simple questions but I guess one can't expect much from a high school education these days.
Those questions were red herring statements that didn’t support your argument, or detract from hers. I don’t blame her for not answering them.
SimplyMIchael: Its sad how cowardly many Republican's are, so terrified of the Muslim menace
http://switch5.castup.net/frames/20041020_MemriTV_Popup/video_480x360.asp?ClipMediaID=60227&ak=null
quote:
We have ruled the world before
And by Allah, the day will come when we will rule the entire world again
The day will come when we will rule America
The day will come when we will rule Britain and the entire world…
After Bin Laden told us that we should convert to Islam, and considering the above tying the Moorish Caliphates to the modern day “Islamic Nation”, who wouldn’t see this as some kind of menace?
How many times did Bin Laden talk about ill fate falling on America before the attacks of 9/11/2001?
The above isn’t isolated, but common. Their ultimate goal is converting the world to their brand of Islam. Our response, witch amounts to us fighting in a MORTAL fight, doesn’t constitute cowardly. But us fighting so that our civilization, and our way of life, doesn’t perish.
SimplyMIchael: that they are ready to surrender the constitution, their rights, and god knows what else to a group who couldn't even beat France. Just seems so odd.
Nobody, NOT ONE person, that’s thrown this charge, has been able to prove his point.
But, I’ve been able to prove the constitutionality, and legality, of our government’s actions that’s earning them the “giving up the constitution” label.
|
|
|
|
