MsLilac
Posts: 151
Joined: 5/31/2007 Status: offline
|
As Lashra said, that would really depend upon the sissy, and more importantly, the person. Also, the term ‘sissy’ is pretty much an umbrella term for everything from feminization and ‘adult babies‘, to effeminate men and bull busting. The only ones that I have passing interests in are feminization, (I have a soft spot for effeminate men also). The rest to me personally very much have an ick factor. As a kink within itself, I have mixed feelings towards it. I like having a plaything to very occasionally dress up when the mood takes me. I wanted to be a make-up artist when I was younger, so I find it fun. But I wouldn’t call it a kink of mine, and it has to be on my whim. I certainly don’t get turned on by it in the least, actually, depending upon the male and how well it is done, it can be a HUGE turn off factor. But on the flip side, I see the point of view that ‘sissydom’ is quite offensive. It’s a parody of a repressive female stereotype, I rarely see dominant C/D’s. Also, for a lot of sissies I have come across, they seem fixated upon their fetish, which is all well and good for them, but I not something I am interested in. If I wanted to have a partner who was fixated upon their own desires, and was high maintenance, I’d go vanilla! Only room for one Prima Donna in my house! Lol. A ‘manly’ submissive male, whose feminisation fetish wasn’t a motivation for their ‘submission’, or wasn’t a huge fixation for them, I would theoretical be open to if I were still looking.
_____________________________
I’m sorry, I don’t do autographs
|