Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
|
Thank you to all the naysayers, I appreciate your concern. But I am not stupid. I was not going to dump it in battery acid, boil it down and eat it. And wonder now about making it colloidal, perhaps that is too much.
I'd bet I can find out about the silver content of a colloidal liquid by measuring it's electrical conductivity, but I have no reference. But then if I always had a silver dime at the bottom of a glass of beer, that would be taking it the natural way, which IMO should not harm me.
And that was one of my biggest problems, just how much do you need ? And how do you measure it on top of that ? If I do anything, I will research it, but until then, if I left a peice of silver in my spaghetti sauce or paprikash as it cooked, that is highly unikely to cause problems. If I were to put silver into a vat of anything like that, the absorption should be normal.
Stew, soup, sauce, it is all the same thing really.
Now here's a thing that does not involve wierd chemistry, well not quite. You may remember that I have no sweet tooth at all. Sweet things are almost repungnant to me. The last few times I drank tea, it was with seasalt and butter. You have to keep stirring it up, but it is different to say the least. I almost like it. Now what if there was a silver dollar in it ? Would that heated mixture with salts and fats extract some of that silver ? It might, and I think if it does it will be in a natural form.
I'll swear by colloidal minerals, but the people who make them did a bit of homework, and had real chemists and doctors to come up with the formula. I fully agree that I do not have that.
First of all, there are near no published studies on just how much silver you need. There is some mention though of toxicity. Well you can also OD on calcium, phosporous or potassium. In fact, in the right form your body should excrete it, but this is not always true.
I think that one good indicator of our mineral needs would be answered by the following : What is the ratio of these minerals in the Earth itself ? This is a theory I have decided to explore. I grant you that there is very little silver in the Earth, and that you need alot more calcium and who knows what else. However silicon, which is quite prevalent, blows that theory. You need very very little of it. But perhaps the perception is slewed by the fact that sand has silicon. You can't eat sand.
They didn't throw silver dollars into the milk and water buckets for nothing. Do you have any idea what a dollar was worth back then ? I could be over a week's pay. Try throwing your payheck into the milk bottle in the fridge. I am not talking health at this second, the ramifications of sequestering one of your hard earned dollars was not to be taken lightly. A dollar would probably feed you for a month if you tried.
They had some reason for doing it, and they survived times without our modern technology, our phone, pherenomes and who the hell knows what else. They lived without cars. They lived without electricity. They lived without modern medicine.
Now, anyone who wants to flame me must read this in it's entirety first.
I cite myself : We are alive.
I cite myself : The people before us lived more primitively. They established all this for us. If they had not survived without modern technology, we would not be here.
So, I intend somehow to get this silver into my body, but have decided aginst colloidal. For some reason silver must dissolve slowly or something in water based solutes. If that did not benefit humans, they would not throw silver into cisterns or whatever.
Now there is another question, which I almost deem to be more important.
I intend to make things that are heated, and I intend to put silver into them. I do not mean acid, I mean things like soup, stew, sauce. This is more natural and it suits me alot better anyway. The people who told me silver should never be ingested should unjerk their knee. I can explain, but please, a bit later. You could say the same thing about copper, but a copper deficiency will cause a stroke. But you only need a little bit. There are only a few minerals that are not considered trace minerals. Like potassium, carbon, calcium and so forth. The rest of them are components of the parts of your body and are essential, but you only need a little bit of most of them. I think you need alot smaller bit of silver.
But the question is, should I leave the tarnish on when I drop it in ? I think so. I think you want that, is it not the oxidation of silver ? Now here will be an interesting experiment. I'll put it in. remember this is not acid or anything, this is food. It will be clean, but will still have the tarnish. What if it comes out of the pot without tarnish ? Has anyone ever tried this ?
I am going to make something, and I intend to drop some silver into the pot. I will give some of this to my buddy who we think has MRSA. I will eat it as well of course. But what if it works ?
What if I ground it up and added it to soil for the garden ? Or an herb garden ?
There are more natural ways than to colloidize it. And people in the past used those ways to survive.
And I will throw one more thing out there, people used to live alot longer. There are two factors at work which decieve us, one of which is statistics. With all the people killed in wars, of course the average lifespan is down. And there is another factor, to judge the age of a skeleton, a fossil, they use toda's standards of decay you age at. Not carbon dating, but the age at which some guy died a long time ago. I submit that we go down the tubes faster now, while our ancestors, while still in their prime, got killed by somebody. That makes it all fit.
And even if they didn't have a POTENTIAL longer lifespan, they didn't have inhalers, nitroglycerine, congfucking something, nothing. There was no lipitor, but they brought home the bacon. There was no vasodilators, but they lived on fat for part of the year.
I remember my Grandmother making squatki for me. They used to eat that ? Are we the same species ? I say that now, but the stuff was really good. Why didn't they die young ? I say it is because nobody killed them.
Anthropological studies could be skewed because of environmental factors. If you dispute that I just don't know what to say. My Granfather kept his teeth until the day he died, and he made it to his seventies. I think if they found his skeleton today they would think him alot younger at the time of death because of that. Get it ?
That is what I am talking about, it is not that we have no facts, it is that we do not each and every one of us, get the chance to interpret them for ourselves. I think that is the problem. They say people live longer now, but what, in an iron lung ? It is medical science that keeps some alive, when nature wants them dead. Harsh ? Not yet.
If you think I will abandon my theories, and this "survival of the fittest" attitude because my friend of thirty years dies of MRSA, you are mistaken. He wasn't fit enough. I have told him to get off the high carbs, get some nutrients and fortify his body. Did he listen ? no. I am absolved of everything in this. I tried. If the silver shit does not work, oh well.
I'm not saying I will be happy, but him dying will not change my point of view. I will know that I have tried.
T
|
Re:disease theory, MRSA - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread