RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


GoddessDustyGold -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/9/2007 3:57:46 PM)

I am getting the feeling that you are looking for a girlfriend and you want this girlfriend to be a Domina, but only as far as you want Her to dominate you, which, right now, is in the bedroom.  Slow down.
You need to get out into your community, very badly!  If you consistenly show up to munches, events, offer to help, participate politely and intelligently in conversation and remain open to learning, you will probably eventually get a bit of play.  And you will also get a good exposure to other aspects of D/s.  Don't expect to jump into a relationship with a seasoned Domina who is seeking more than a bedroom boy.  There is no hurry.  Take your time, get to know some people, and work your way slowly into the submission that would go beyond the bedroom.  You will lean what you enjoy and how far you can go.  This isn't a sprint.  It's a marathon. 
Patience...




sensubmaybe -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/9/2007 5:03:05 PM)

hammerthrowing, I feel the same way about of lot of this, you aren't alone. I have been accepting a proclivity to sexual submission for a while now. My last vanilla relationship left me unsatisfied and I am new here too, and seeking to find a woman with whom to establish are real relationship to explore mutual needs in this arena.

It's tiring that so many people in this scene/life/whatever ironically have limited imaginations about how things can be and they have a need to categorize almost as much for the sake of dismissing someone as finding them. Some people will dismiss your desire to submit sexually as a kink with the implication that it is just some kind of game or foolishness and you should just go find a vanilla girlfriend and get her into your role play. That's a shortsighted unimaginative way to look at this. Kink apparently implies some kind of self indulgent superficiality. This point of view ignores the potentially very real emotional and psychological needs of vulnerability and the need to express them. It is disregarding of the deep meta messages underlying certain acts and rituals when they are dismissed as kinks. Yeah, maybe wanting to spray your lover with whipped cream is a fun, superficial kink, but the problem is that the phrase kinky is a lot like the phrase world music. There are many different kinds with varying degrees of seriousness based on what they are and the people engaging in them. To have a desire to be sexually submissive, however that is played out, at least for me, involves a sincere need to erotically work through issues of respect, appreciation and adoration of who she is as a person, not just because she is some woman who calls her self a domme. It is highly personal and it isn't going to work with a run of the mill lifestyle or pro domme with her own agenda and little or no concern for me and my needs. It has to be mutual. If people want to say that that's a bottom, or just kinks, whatever, that's their opinion and misinformation and X number of years "in the life" doesn't matter or make them right.

What matters is finding someone who is right for you, who is turned on by the things you want to do in your sexual submission with her. It will require flexibility and an open mind for both of you since it is a relationship of equals who happen to desire a specific kind of dynamic. How you treat her and what the relationship is like out of bed is a different but related matter. I would bet that you, like me, at the absolute very least are prepared to offer respect and appreciation if not a willingness to let her have certain controls. After all, how could you not feel this way about a woman who is leading you in bed to get what you both want and need? 
 
People like us might need a new category. Anyone who would dismiss us and assume that you are just another "do me" guy is not worth your respect and submission. This has to happen in stages. It requires compatability and trust from women who really have compassion, passion, wisdom, inner strength and insight, not just women running around with lots of accessories and a thing for flogging and wanting what they want because they want it.




TNstepsout -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/9/2007 7:24:40 PM)

That was very well said. I think you are exactly right. There is a huge range between play party bottom and exclusive D/s relationship. Both you and the OP seem to know what you want and that should go a long way to helping you find it. What I've experienced is that many men don't really know what they want, so they agree to anything, only to back out later. This causes hard feelings and frustration.




thetammyjo -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/9/2007 7:50:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TNstepsout

That was very well said. I think you are exactly right. There is a huge range between play party bottom and exclusive D/s relationship. Both you and the OP seem to know what you want and that should go a long way to helping you find it. What I've experienced is that many men don't really know what they want, so they agree to anything, only to back out later. This causes hard feelings and frustration.


And one way to do this is to join BDSM organizations and attend events.

Heck you can find great people who have lots of common interests and in my experience the vast majority of people at these events are into the sexual BDSM not 24/7 things.

So I'm basically repeating a lot of good advice. To the OP and others: Take your knowledge and use it to meet others in meatlife who have similar interests. Do not let a lack of imagination to use sensubmaybe's term limit you to online venues only.




cloudboy -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/9/2007 8:09:33 PM)


Who you are is ALL IMPORTANT. Rather than focus on BDSM generalities, I think its better to focus on your own intrinsic personality traits such as:

1. High self esteem.

2. Perceptiveness

3. Assertiveness

4. Ability to inspire interest

5. Ability to make someone laugh

6. Ability to make someone think

7. A talent for helping out

8. Senusal IQ

9. Knowing how to lead

10. Knowing how to follow.

11. Creativity

12. Empathy

---------

Using all of the above, you can channel BDSM effectively. If you as a person are a dud, you won't be able to channel shit.

Personality is EVERYTHING.




PsyVamp -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/9/2007 8:21:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hammerthrowing

Lend me a hand here. Does it really matter if I only submit sexually? Women incredible as they are make me melt when they tell me what to do and how to do it. But it's in the bedroom I am turned on and aroused by being told what to do and how to do it. Period and only. Thats the only time I am aroused. Does that make me a sexuallysubmissive person meaning a bottom?


Okay fine, how about the Domme has you do only sexual things, but you don't get to get off, only she gets off and then sends you home (or leaves, or hangs up...whatever)
Does your "submission" allow for that?

And I agree with some of the others- be honest from the first communication, tell them your kink is sexual and only of a bedroom nature... won't fly with me, but there are some it may fit perfectly

Lady Jag (Psy)




MisPandora -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 8:36:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sensubmaybe

It's tiring that so many people in this scene/life/whatever ironically have limited imaginations about how things can be and they have a need to categorize almost as much for the sake of dismissing someone as finding them. Some people will dismiss your desire to submit sexually as a kink with the implication that it is just some kind of game or foolishness and you should just go find a vanilla girlfriend and get her into your role play. That's a shortsighted unimaginative way to look at this.

Please look at it as a two way street.  I surely don't want to waste my time on a fellow who doesn't have the desire to explore where I do, nor do I want him to waste his time knowing full well that I have no intention to accomodate his kink, his privacy seeking, etc.  Women are entitled to seek out exactly what they want (just as you are) to the point that the search might very well be self-limiting or extremely narrow in scope.  Because we will not settle and take something less than what we desire in our lives doesn't mean that we have limited imaginations.




sensubmaybe -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 3:01:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisPandora

quote:

ORIGINAL: sensubmaybe

It's tiring that so many people in this scene/life/whatever ironically have limited imaginations about how things can be and they have a need to categorize almost as much for the sake of dismissing someone as finding them. Some people will dismiss your desire to submit sexually as a kink with the implication that it is just some kind of game or foolishness and you should just go find a vanilla girlfriend and get her into your role play. That's a shortsighted unimaginative way to look at this.

Please look at it as a two way street.  I surely don't want to waste my time on a fellow who doesn't have the desire to explore where I do, nor do I want him to waste his time knowing full well that I have no intention to accomodate his kink, his privacy seeking, etc.  Women are entitled to seek out exactly what they want (just as you are) to the point that the search might very well be self-limiting or extremely narrow in scope.  Because we will not settle and take something less than what we desire in our lives doesn't mean that we have limited imaginations.


I never implied that it wasn't a two way street. Nor did I say that people aren't entitled to do what they want. Of course they are and hopefully they do so reasonably and respectfully when approached. I'm sharing my observations and experiences, which are as valid as yours or anyone else's. I'm not sure why you are challenging them. Your comments seem off the mark. 

Perhaps you don't have or see yourself as having a limited imagination, so fine, that's great. But when people immediately, without even taking any time at all to get to know me come to their own conclusions using stereotypes and assumptions, then dismiss me because what I want doesn't match their version of categories or what they they think I should be, do and seek, to me it is not only a limited imagination, it is flat out disrespectful and demeaning. Anyone with any class, confidence, compassion or wisdom whatsoever, would be smart enough and graceful enough to reply with a "thanks, but I don't think our interests are mutual." Even a simple  "not interested and best of luck," would be better than accusations of insincerity, selfishness, bottom, kink, "do me" types, or any of the other same old tired, uncalled for call outs. 

Not that I've gotten lots of these, but a few and mostly from women who contacted me in some cases when my ad clearly didn't state that I was some kind of lifestyle sub, or that I was looking to become someone's doormat without thought or consideration of my needs. In fact it said the opposite, to the point that I've added a disclaimer. After investing my time (which by the way is as important and valuable as yours or anyone else's) in writing a conscious, sincere statement of intention and desire, one of the responses I received was a one line email saying:

"How will I know you are worthy of Me?"

I should have just hit delete, but I was quite new and genuinely perplexed, but made what I thought was an earnest attempt by writing back:

"You'll know I am worthy of you the same way I'll know you are worthy or me, we'll have to get to know each other."

Well, apparently I didn't know my end of the script because this woman, so called "domme," wrote back in tones of outrage and disdain accusing me of being shallow, a phoney and an amateur! WTF? Maybe there are people who are willing to offer immediate blind submission and declare unworthiness to any of the tons of ads here that virtually say the same thing, but just because you use capital letters for all references to yourself and lower case for me doesn't make you worthy of anything. It's ridiculous.    

To be called such things by someone who seems to define herself by her BDSM wardrobe and accessories, whose profile presents her depth and authenticity in terms of "you will address me as Mistress (fill in the blank) you will cater to my every need and ask nothing in return, and I will humiliate you, inflict pain upon you, expect you to pay me tributes, blah, blah, blah, I'm a bitch, blah, blah, blah, and in this you will find true happiness in your service to me" is somewhere between pathetic and the source of true belly laughter. If there are people out there, and apparently there are, who really seek this, then great, I'm happy for them. But there is no need to be cruel or judgmental and gravitate to assumptions and stereotypes about those of us who seek something else.  




MisPandora -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 3:07:28 PM)

*blinks* Well....now.  I hope you feel better now that you've gotten all of that off of your chest.....




sensubmaybe -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 3:34:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisPandora

*blinks* Well....now.  I hope you feel better now that you've gotten all of that off of your chest.....


Hmmm...apparently I've touched a nerve. Not sure why you felt it neccessary to make that comment, but whatever.

If the leather corset fits... 




GoddessDustyGold -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 4:55:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sensubmaybe

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisPandora

quote:

ORIGINAL: sensubmaybe

It's tiring that so many people in this scene/life/whatever ironically have limited imaginations about how things can be and they have a need to categorize almost as much for the sake of dismissing someone as finding them. Some people will dismiss your desire to submit sexually as a kink with the implication that it is just some kind of game or foolishness and you should just go find a vanilla girlfriend and get her into your role play. That's a shortsighted unimaginative way to look at this.

Please look at it as a two way street.  I surely don't want to waste my time on a fellow who doesn't have the desire to explore where I do, nor do I want him to waste his time knowing full well that I have no intention to accomodate his kink, his privacy seeking, etc.  Women are entitled to seek out exactly what they want (just as you are) to the point that the search might very well be self-limiting or extremely narrow in scope.  Because we will not settle and take something less than what we desire in our lives doesn't mean that we have limited imaginations.


I never implied that it wasn't a two way street. Nor did I say that people aren't entitled to do what they want. Of course they are and hopefully they do so reasonably and respectfully when approached. I'm sharing my observations and experiences, which are as valid as yours or anyone else's. I'm not sure why you are challenging them. Your comments seem off the mark. 

Perhaps you don't have or see yourself as having a limited imagination, so fine, that's great. But when people immediately, without even taking any time at all to get to know me come to their own conclusions using stereotypes and assumptions, then dismiss me because what I want doesn't match their version of categories or what they they think I should be, do and seek, to me it is not only a limited imagination, it is flat out disrespectful and demeaning. Anyone with any class, confidence, compassion or wisdom whatsoever, would be smart enough and graceful enough to reply with a "thanks, but I don't think our interests are mutual." Even a simple  "not interested and best of luck," would be better than accusations of insincerity, selfishness, bottom, kink, "do me" types, or any of the other same old tired, uncalled for call outs. 


Where are you getting this from?  I would caution you that, if you spend any time at these boards, you will come to realize that most of the Ladies who participate here are not the ones you accuse of this behavior.  Sorry if you have felt demeaned, but I feel demeaned several times a day.  Actually, I don't anymore, because I toss it off.  But there was a time, years ago, when I felt horrible about the assumptions made regarding myself, just because I have an ad on an alternative lifestyle site.   

quote:

Not that I've gotten lots of these, but a few and mostly from women who contacted me in some cases when my ad clearly didn't state that I was some kind of lifestyle sub, or that I was looking to become someone's doormat without thought or consideration of my needs. In fact it said the opposite, to the point that I've added a disclaimer.


Nice to see that there are even some males out there who now have to put disclaimers on their profiles to avoid having to reply to those who have no consideration for what is written in a profile.  We do this all the time.  And get accused of being unfair.  Should I do the same to you?  I won't, so I am not happy with the idea that you assume I do or would. 

quote:

 After investing my time (which by the way is as important and valuable as yours or anyone else's) in writing a conscious, sincere statement of intention and desire, one of the responses I received was a one line email saying:

"How will I know you are worthy of Me?"

I should have just hit delete, but I was quite new and genuinely perplexed, but made what I thought was an earnest attempt by writing back:

"You'll know I am worthy of you the same way I'll know you are worthy or me, we'll have to get to know each other."

Well, apparently I didn't know my end of the script because this woman, so called "domme," wrote back in tones of outrage and disdain accusing me of being shallow, a phoney and an amateur! WTF? Maybe there are people who are willing to offer immediate blind submission and declare unworthiness to any of the tons of ads here that virtually say the same thing, but just because you use capital letters for all references to yourself and lower case for me doesn't make you worthy of anything. It's ridiculous.    


Of course it's ridiculous.  Just as ridiculous as the mail that pours into our in boxes day after day.  "I'm in Phoenix.  Looking for some kinky play".  Yup, that was about 3 days ago.  I wrote back.  "I'm so happy for you.  Perhaps you will find some". 
 
If you hear from someone and you realize you would not be a good match, based upon her profile, then write saying "No thanks" or don't write at all.  If you are getting the sort of response that you indicate above, then perhaps you need to look at the profiles to which you are responding.  Your time is valuable.  Some of it is going to be a crap shoot.  But if you are consistently having difficulty, then you need to look at what is attracting you to these profiles in the first place, and rethink who you are approaching. 
However, you do say that you have not gotten much of this.  So I am wondering why you are so adamant about your complaint, about feeling demeaned, about whining that it is unfair.  Are you trying to take up the standard for all the males who are so misunderstood.  Believe, we understand you just fine.  Take the advice already given several times and get out into real life and real time.  Get to know people.  Don't just stay online.  You are making some sweeping generalizations here that are way off the mark. 


quote:

To be called such things by someone who seems to define herself by her BDSM wardrobe and accessories, whose profile presents her depth and authenticity in terms of "you will address me as Mistress (fill in the blank) you will cater to my every need and ask nothing in return, and I will humiliate you, inflict pain upon you, expect you to pay me tributes, blah, blah, blah, I'm a bitch, blah, blah, blah, and in this you will find true happiness in your service to me" is somewhere between pathetic and the source of true belly laughter. If there are people out there, and apparently there are, who really seek this, then great, I'm happy for them. But there is no need to be cruel or judgmental and gravitate to assumptions and stereotypes about those of us who seek something else.  


Ya know, there are Ladies out there who present themselves in this manner.  And there are lots of males who swoon over the words.  Some of them probably get off just reading the profiles and have no need to go any further.  Some of them, probably too many of them, write silly emails and it is painfully obvious that they are using one hand at the keyboard.  We get really sick of it.  I am sure you would not respond well to My profile, but I would not expect to hear from you.  It's when I do hear from many, day in and day out that refuse to comprehend what I want, and try to insist that I should be available to help them along their exploratory trail, that I get impatient.  Your style is not My style since I am looking for more than a lovely companion who is basically into exploring "bedroom submission", but must maintain the status quo in the rest of the relationship.  It just will not work for Me.
Again, hang around these boards for a while.  Many of us joke about the fact that we do not run around in leather, do our make-up perfectly, and bark orders all day long.  We are very capable Women who just desire a different style of relationship.  Often that extends to way beyond the bedroom.
No one objects to  or demeans the fact that you are only seeking one aspect of this style of relationship.  If they do, then you should ignore them. But if you approach a FemDom with the express agenda of having a vanilla relationship outside of the bedroom, many are not going to take you up on it.  It is of no interest to Us.  We only ask that you respect and honor that, and don't call us "so called Dommes" or "unimaginative".  We just might have way more imagination than you do!  *Smile*
You are going to be categorized.  This is not necessarily a negative thing.  It is the way people sort through.  At present, it sounds like you are an exploring bedroom bottom.  There is a difference between that an a "do me" boy.  There are tons of "do me" boys.  "I want to learn about <CBT, strap on play, insert favorite kink here>  but I am having a hard time finding a Mistress who will administer it".  Administer it?  That sounds pretty cold.  It is also truly the only thing these boys want.  And they completely fail to understand why we have no interest.  We might enjoy some of these activities, but that does not mean we are here to service their needs when they are ready to bend over or drop their drawers.  So ya better be bringing more to the table than that.  Even if it is just some damn fine company along with your good hygiene and sparkling personality.  
Get out from behind the computer monitor.  Be honest and open.  Expose yourself to more than just the kink aspect of this sub-culture.  That is the only way you will find out how far you can go.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING A BEDROOM BOTTOM.  THAT IS BDSM. 
D/s (Domination and submission) and M/s (Master-Mistress/slave) is where you have no interest.  At least at this point.   All you need to do is respect that others are coming from a different angle, and if it is not for you, then that is fine.  Don't disparage those preferences, and don't assume that all Dominas, just because they are not interested in your limited view, are disparaging yours.
I suspect Pandora responded in the manner she did, to express the awe at which you took her nice post and turned it into fodder for yet another long rant. 
That said, perhaps I too am relieved that you got all this off your chest.  Maybe you can now move on to more productive things.




MisPandora -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 5:29:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BEING A BEDROOM BOTTOM.  THAT IS BDSM. 
D/s (Domination and submission) and M/s (Master-Mistress/slave) is where you have no interest.  At least at this point.   All you need to do is respect that others are coming from a different angle, and if it is not for you, then that is fine.  Don't disparage those preferences, and don't assume that all Dominas, just because they are not interested in your limited view, are disparaging yours.
I suspect Pandora responded in the manner she did, to express the awe at which you took her nice post and turned it into fodder for yet another long rant. 
That said, perhaps I too am relieved that you got all this off your chest.  Maybe you can now move on to more productive things.

Amen.  I could not have said it better.  His venting of the spleen at me for an innocuous "look at the other side" response speaks volumes to why women might cut him off so quickly.  I only hope that he finds a more productive way of moving forward from here. 




MissMagnolia -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 5:42:10 PM)

I love it when a question is asked of women, one responds with ones view based on ones experiences, and then MALES see fit to try to say you are wrong.

hardbodysub, when you have dealt with as many "do me" subs as I have, have experienced what I have experienced with sub males, you may express an opinion on MY opinion. Until then, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.





MsCfromMelbourne -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/10/2007 6:02:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hammerthrowing

I like aggressive women in the bedroom, man I tell you this. But I like an all around take-charge woman too. I feel I am a bottom submissive because a woman can get me to do anything, even eat my own foot, in the bedroom. At the same time, I have always had a profound desire to answer to a strict woman.

Am I simply not a slave level submissive who can totally yield all control even though at times and since I was a youngster, all I wanted was a strong strict older woman or is it that I simply haven't met the domme who I can trust at the unconscious level to let go of all of everything?
.....
At this time all I know is I have antsy, strong urges to sexually submit in the bedroom and yet I also have deep, hidden yearnings to please a woman in all ways and be told good job.
.....


I am a bit confused (but what's new?).  Does a "bedroom submissive only " beg you for sex then jump out of bed and order you to make his dinner?  Why does being sexually submissive seem to  preclude you being submissive in other ways (to the woman you love - not everyone!)

Why not keep any open mind about exactly how submissive you could be and wait to meet a lady who really taps into your desire to submit?

I have a sneaky suspicion that when you fall head over heels in love with a Domme, there will be nothing you won't do to please her.  In and out of the bedroom you will be devoted to serving her (and thrilled about it)

You might be more the "chivalrous knight serving his Queen" than the "snivelling slave in the dungeon" type....but I am guessing.  

Being so turned on by Dominant women is a really good start.  That makes you much better sub material in my view than someone who doesn't like Femdom sexuality. I wouldn't apologise for it or give yourself a limiting label either.  

And I wouldn't read too much into the fact that you don't immediately want to submit body and soul to every self-proclaimed Domme on the planet.  Especially if all she wants is someone to stroke her ego and clean her house!!  Wait for someone worthy.

Wait for Ms Right and she will blow your mind.  To the rest, just say "thanks, it was lovely to meet you, but no thanks.....unless all you want is a quick bonk  [:D]"  Hey, its worth a try!!!!




TexasMaam -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/11/2007 10:28:02 AM)

If you also get turned on by the mere thought of really pounding your cock into a hot wet pussy, making her take it from you the way you want to ram it to her, then honey, you're a switch.  Welcome to the upside down world of BDSM!

; )

TM




vampchick88 -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/11/2007 10:54:35 AM)

This can be taken many ways, there are a lot of men out there who just want to be "taken" by another woman.  That just means you like kinky fun.  A Domme is a person whos actions go a bit further than just the bedroom door.  Ropes, handcuffs, etc...those are things that my vanilla friends use as kink to spice up the relationship.  A true Domme uses these and at times more extreme measures, and will follow through with this on a day to day status...not only in the bedroom.
  MsCfromMelbourne says it best that when you find the right Domme you'll be able to submit all. Being a submissive is way more than just submitting in bed and letting her be on top and a bit fiesty.  Sexuality can have a part in it, though with many it has no role what so ever.  I have previously met males who stated they were slaves and were only looking for rough sex, I told them to hit the road. For me its a lifestyle not for me to be viewed as a rough prostitute.




hardbodysub -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/11/2007 4:17:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissMagnolia

I love it when a question is asked of women, one responds with ones view based on ones experiences, and then MALES see fit to try to say you are wrong.

hardbodysub, when you have dealt with as many "do me" subs as I have, have experienced what I have experienced with sub males, you may express an opinion on MY opinion. Until then, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.




I love it when a woman makes an illogical statement, and then gets all pissy when someone has the audacity to disagree and be male at the same time.

MissMagnolia, the last time I looked, the whole purpose of these boards was to foster the exchange of information and opinions, so I really don't think I need your permission to state my opinion on anything. The simple fact that a quesition was asked of one gender certainly doesn't preclude those of other genders from contributing to the discussion, partiularly when they feel someone else is being treated unfairly.




usabadger -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/11/2007 4:28:17 PM)

quote:

This can be taken many ways, there are a lot of men out there who just want to be "taken" by another woman. That just means you like kinky fun. A Domme is a person whos actions go a bit further than just the bedroom door. Ropes, handcuffs, etc...those are things that my vanilla friends use as kink to spice up the relationship. A true Domme uses these and at times more extreme measures, and will follow through with this on a day to day status...not only in the bedroom.
MsCfromMelbourne says it best that when you find the right Domme you'll be able to submit all. Being a submissive is way more than just submitting in bed and letting her be on top and a bit fiesty. Sexuality can have a part in it, though with many it has no role what so ever. I have previously met males who stated they were slaves and were only looking for rough sex, I told them to hit the road. For me its a lifestyle not for me to be viewed as a rough prostitute.


This post seems to illustrate hammerthrowing's and sensubmaybe's concerns very well.

In my experience, subs are not born they are made.  Clever dominants know this and exploit it well.





sensubmaybe -> RE: submisisve man or sexually-submissive bottom (11/11/2007 7:17:37 PM)

To my critics, all I can say is that I initially expressed an opinion, based on my own experience, that was by no means a personal attack to anyone specifically, certainly not anyone here. Yet for reasons that still make no sense to me, my comments were somehow apparently taken to heart when my initial critic felt the need to remind me that it was a two way street, etc. (you can read it above). Again, I never directed my comments at her. I never suggested it wasn't a two way street or anything along those lines. I was talking about my experiences and expressing my opinion. If others take something not directed at them personally, that's not my problem, nor does it mean I should refrain from responding to inappropriate reactions to my comments. Maybe you need to check your head. 

Then, when I commented again to address her initial inappropriate comments which were unsolicited and directed at me, and I expressed my opinion and pointed out the falicy of her accusations, she reacted with sarcasm. That's was misguided, ignorant and arrogant in my opinion.  

I was "cautioned" that if I spent time here I would see that the women on these boards aren't the type I describe. What is that about? I never suggested you were. Why are you taking it personally when it wasn't directed at you?  Why would you challenge someone else's experience and opinion? I certainly don't challenge yours. Again, I never specifically accused anyone of anything, and I certainly never said ALL of anyone was anything. I would never deal in such absolutes. I was intially posting to the guy who started this thread, offering my own experiences, observations and point of view.

I have not solicited anyone whose profile commentary included the kind of language I referred to in my comments, in fact I have written to very few women since the majority of the profiles of women in my area say the kinds of things that don't interest me. That isn't generalization, it's statistical fact, based on reading the profiles of women that fit the age and geographic criteria I use for a search. 

I have written to a handful of women who seemed like they might be open to the kind of relationship I am looking for. In none of those cases did I talk about anything I was interested in, nor did I ask them to do anything to me, for me or anything like that. In all of them I simply told them that I liked their profiles for whatever specific reason, which was different for each, and I invited them to look at my profile and let me know if they would be interested in getting to know each better and exploring mutual compatability. In all cases I thanked them for their consideration and wished them well regardless of our outcome.  

I have engaged some who wrote back, didn't hear from others. More than that I have been approached by women. In some cases they were writing to tell me that they appreciated my profile and wished we were more geographically well suited, a couple that were realistic I am exchanging with now, and then there were the inappropriate ones. For the record, my entire experience is not made up of only what I have found at this web site.  

I am not sure why anyone else here would felt challenged by what I wrote here other than perhaps they took something to heart that was never directed at them. I certainly never wrote to any of you. In my opinion, there are a lot of people with limited imaginations here and a need to categorize and make assumptions. It's been done right here in this thread, including in comments to me.

If you get lots of inappropriate responses from men/subs, all I can say is I don't challenge or question it or feel the need to remind you "that it's a two way street," as was done to me. Beyond that, it wasn't me...don't lump me in. I don't represent anyone other than myself. I doubt that I can relate to most of the men here either.

Yes, I felt the need to put up disclaimers as a courtesy so that people won't waste their time or mine. Now one of my critics here asked me if I should be "called on this." WTF? I never challenged you or anyone else who has disclaimers. I am respectful of them. Again, if other's find fault, they aren't me. I'm a respectful guy who is apparently looking for something less common. I don't need to be categorized, or criticized for pointing out those that do and again for expressing my own opinion. I respect women, I respect people. I am not generically, across the board submissive to anyone. I base respect based not on gender, but on intelligence and character. I am eager and receptive to exploring my submissiveness, wherever that is today and wherever it may go, with the right woman.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875