Collarme classifications (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


chicagoguy1 -> Collarme classifications (11/11/2007 4:48:55 PM)

I am sorry if I just created another discussion regarding Collarme classifications. I did see one entitled “making the most out of Collarme” which talks about fakes. However as Collarme grows I would like to see more grouping.  I have used “They are seeking” option without much success. 

Issues where the user is at fault


- For the most part it the fault of the person creating the profile but what I would like to see
  Looking for others female or male to join their house hold (not checking a poly household)
- Just looking to chat not seeking  or are taken (not checking friends only)
- Seeking one sex or the other (not checking the right boxes)



    What I would like added ( each person only can vote once for each topic)

    - Is a rating system like positive or negative – for issues like attitudes, be littling people, or failure to respond.
    - Is a fake indicator (more responses more likely fake)  - game players, people seeking money for services, sales of other web services like web dating, pay for web cams, or Individuals who misrepresent themselves men posing as females, individuals who say they are from the US but are from Africa. When they reach a certain level they are terminated from collarme.
    - An indicator if they have blocked you from sending email – reason in my case contact an individual. They  responded with a no so nice response then shut you down from responding before you can make a reply.




      Prinsexx -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/11/2007 4:52:16 PM)

      I really don't know as I don't have the sort of SI...systematic intelligence to be able to figure out what you are talking about...
      I used to think I had a high EI...emotional intelligence, until I recently fucked up (again)....what was your point again.....
      .




      KatyLied -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/11/2007 5:22:46 PM)

      quote:

      what was your point again......


      I think he's having trouble getting a date, at least that's what I read.




      kc692 -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/11/2007 5:22:55 PM)

      quote:

      ORIGINAL: chicagoguy1

      I am sorry if I just created another discussion regarding Collarme classifications. I did see one entitled “making the most out of Collarme” which talks about fakes. However as Collarme grows I would like to see more grouping.  I have used “They are seeking” option without much success. 

      Issues where the user is at fault


      - For the most part it the fault of the person creating the profile but what I would like to see
      Looking for others female or male to join their house hold (not checking a poly household)
      - Just looking to chat not seeking  or are taken (not checking friends only)
      - Seeking one sex or the other (not checking the right boxes)



        What I would like added ( each person only can vote once for each topic)

        - Is a rating system like positive or negative – for issues like attitudes, be littling people, or failure to respond.
        - Is a fake indicator (more responses more likely fake)  - game players, people seeking money for services, sales of other web services like web dating, pay for web cams, or Individuals who misrepresent themselves men posing as females, individuals who say they are from the US but are from Africa. When they reach a certain level they are terminated from collarme.
        - An indicator if they have blocked you from sending email – reason in my case contact an individual. They  responded with a no so nice response then shut you down from responding before you can make a reply.







          I have read no answers, the OP was enough to make me start typing, so I have seen no other answers. I'm sure they will be nicer than mine.

          In other words,

          a rating system, so you can blacklist whoever the hell you would like for others to see because they were or did something not to your liking..like daring to not answer your all important email promptly, or they had an attitude when they answered your email, or you just consider them plain rude because they weren't polite enough for ya(attitude)

          fake indicator(which is the report profile button BTW,) so that you can decide when people are terminated from collarme

          a way to report people that have blocked you, so NOONE else will waste their time writing that person, cuz after all, they didn't answer you promptly or courteously.  They told you to bugger off, and when you tried to send your scathing reply, dayum, you were blocked. 

          Would you like the same done to you??? 

          By the way, welcome to the boards.  We love doms that whine on their first post.  Good luck on getting that black list going........but hey, when we do, I have no doubt how you will rate me for this post

          edited to add:  Have no fear, I have not blocked you, so if you desire to let me feel your ire, I'm on the other side.  At least you couldnt report me for that.

          edited to add yet again:  People seeking money for services are not automatically breaching tos.  Would you like to rewrite that too ???

          edited to add one last time::::::RFLMAO, I just read your profile.  Good luck with what you seek,. The whines in the journal will help too.




          bipolarber -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/11/2007 6:51:43 PM)

          To the OP (who looks a little like VP Cheaney) are you joking with this? You want to be able to respond to people who have you blocked? Thus negating the whole concept of blocking someone? Or you want rating systems for people who fail to respond to your messages? (I'm not sure Collar Me HAS that kind of bandwidth...) If you want to know why they don't allow people to "rate" other specific users, you might want to check out the "Why We Don't Allow Blacklists." Your rating system for people you don't like would be a defacto blacklist... The funny thing (and maybe the ironic thing) is that it seems like you might end up on it, even if it were to exist! (At least judging from your desire to always have the last word, and/or go around judging others.

          This is a joke, right?




          RCdc -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 8:47:24 AM)

          Seriously though, have you read the TOS and guideline sections at all?  That would kind of answer most of your 'points'.
           
          the.dark.




          pahunkboy -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 8:51:06 AM)

          Such is the net. No matter how one would try to regulate it- you still have the "net".




          juliaoceania -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 8:53:48 AM)

          A ratings system is a sucky idea




          KyttynTheMynx -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 8:57:48 AM)

          if you want a way for others  to be "blacklisted" (as a previous poster called it...) please be prepared to be added to that list for any other manner of reasons. 

          (edited because i need more coffee)




          pahunkboy -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 8:58:43 AM)

          For that matter- we dont know whom the OP is. Anyone can set up a fake profile. One denote another as fake doesnt mean that poster is 100%....




          FirmhandKY -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 9:13:19 AM)

          FR,

          I glanced through the OP's profile, esp parts of his journal.

          I suspect he's just not had a lot of experience with the net, and/or interpersonal relationships.

          For example, he seems to spent a lot of time being engaging with some of the "Nigerian" style "subs".

          My biggest recommendation to him is to go back to the Archives and read threads in the General BDSM Forum from the beginning of CM till now.  I suspect it'll take at least 6 months or so.  When you come back to post on the forums again, have a new profile, a new attitude and some new photos.

          My 2 cents. Take it as you will.

          Firm




          Ysabo -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 9:21:47 AM)

          We have a tendency to take the good with the bad, here, just like in real life. *winks and grins* Those of us who have stuck with the boards and the desire for this lifestyle are getting a bit better at picking out the fakers, losers and whiners. Not that I would deny I can be a bit whiny myself at times, I am submissive, not sub-human, and until I give my rights up to my Master, I have the right to say what I wish here, as anywhere. Hey, being whiny can be very cathartic sometimes. LOL

          Ysabo




          Termyn8or -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 11:45:25 AM)

          Oh, both barrells. I want you to try to take this in stride, but it might not be pleasant.

          First of all if you are dominant in a relationship that does not mean you dominate life, such as a pool of people to pester with emails, or real life, or this forum. We do not submit. There is another guy with an attitude similar to your's and I should tell him the same. As nicely as possible of course.

          Second of all you are looking for a Woman ½ your age. To me, that is unbecoming. It is not immoral or illegal in any way, but what you say to the world is "I can't handle a real Woman with maturity and experience on par with my age". If I were a twenty year old chick, and got a mail from you, I would certainly stay away.

          And, every Dom shuld be dommed at least once. Know what it feels like. Ever try it ?

          You list yourself as a beginner in alot of things, I submit that you are a beginner in the whole mindset. The thing to remember is that what you are looking for is a person, not an object.

          That's why I hardly ever contact anyone on the other side. You put it out there and see who is into someone like you. I have been contacted, but in each case it did not work out, so far. Three times. I am more than happy to dominate, but I want a switch.

          What you are looking for is similarly hard to find. Keep on truckin, and good luck. But for me I would prefer someone in my own age range. I am 47 and I got my minimum age set to 28, and I am thinking of raising that. I want someone who I can get along with.

          To look for someone ½ you age screams that you do not care about anything important, and that the animal in you wants something young and tight. There is more to people than that.

          I can handle someone with equal intelligence and experience, can you ? Of course now the problem is finding such a person. :-(

          I know a Woman in her forties who had has six kids and is still nice and tight. I knew one in her fifties who was still really tight. And then there are some twenty year old hos that you need to stick in a five pound ham and pull out the bone, and some of them never had a child !

          Your attitude reminds me of an old Star Trek episode - Mudd's Women. They took this drug that makes them all hot and sexy, clears their skin, makes them pretty much look like they're twenty. Mudd sold these Women actually, using the drug to get the guys to buy, but then the drug wore off. One guy in particular, saw it happen and he couldn't get the pots clean. She said "Why don't you just hang them outside ?" See on this planet there was a sandstorm just about every day.

          He kept her. She wasn't bad, but she was a far cry from the hottie he thought he bought. But he realized what he needed, or wanted. I have no interest in teenyboppers, I want someone who remembers the shit I remember. You can't just have sex and clean the house all the time. I have no point of reference from which to have a discussion with young people. I am not interested in their nuevo-culture, if you can even call it that. But that is what our forebearers said about us. And it goes on and on.

          Hope you get your young little hottie, just don't expect much conversation. Your points of view will not match.

          That is my opinion, take it how you want.

          T




          Bella1965 -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 12:25:13 PM)

          G'afternoon all:


          *quietly applauds Termyn8or for his restraint*

          To the OP; I'm not that nice. 

          Get real. You're overweight, not easy on the eyes, inexperienced, socially inept, and -you- want the dream date to fall at your feet and worship the ground you walk on in her mini skirt with stilettos. I say your rating system would have you highest in the list of undesirables. Not everyone who finds you a poor match to their search and fails to answer your emails is a  fake. Nice impressions you've made with your first posting.

          Grow a thicker skin, learn to sift the wheat from the chaff, wizen up a bit to the Internet, and do some looking in the mirror without any rose colored glasses. Oy Vey.


          Stay safe, play nice, & share your toys w/ others...


          [:D]


          Bella




          pahunkboy -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 1:32:42 PM)

          Another great post by T.

          You mind is very stimulating.  The eloquent way you spell out your train of thought.  Did you figure out the carreer thing T. ?   Compelling.  Anyhow be well and keep em coming.




          kc692 -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 2:54:59 PM)

          **waits to see if the OP is a one post hit and run wonder, since she sees he is online at the moment, but not answering**




          DiurnalVampire -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 3:00:29 PM)

          Please send your list of grievences and your suggestions in with your next payment to the CollarMe site. They will be addressed as soon as your bill is processed.

          For those who dont get the sarcasm... people do complain an aweful lot about a free site that is here as a help to you.  If you dont like it, why not go to one of the paysites and see how much "better" tey are, where you are inundated with cock and pussy shots, people can say whatever theyd like about anyone, and you have to limit who and how you talk, unless you want to upgrade to the new package.

          The only ones that complain are the ones who arent geting what they are looking for.  It isnt the site...

          DV





          MissMagnolia -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 3:07:38 PM)

          I am sorry if I just created another discussion regarding Collarme classifications. You are patently not sorry, as you created the thread anyway.

          Can you say "sheep"? This isn't a farm, it's a BDSM site. Lot of people, lots of weirdo's, lots of unusual, freaky, gorgeous people ALL with different goals and idea's. Someones trash is someone elses treasure.[8|]

          I don't think you're failing because of the "seeking" function. Take a look at your profile and this thread. There is your answer.




          sambamanslilgirl -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 3:10:14 PM)

          *shakes head in shame* 

          so you finally brought your journal of complaints to the forums - good luck! 

          as i told you before, we submissives/slaves do not have abide to your rules when it comes to responding to your messages ...calling us fakes or gameplayers certainly won't win you any points either.

          popcorn anyone?




          MissMagnolia -> RE: Collarme classifications (11/12/2007 3:17:25 PM)

          Yes please, I'll bring the ice creams and lollies.




          Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

          Valid CSS!




          Collarchat.com © 2025
          Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
          0.03125