petdave
Posts: 2479
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad The site has outgrown the current model, it would appear. i'm not sure that i'd go that far, but picture approval/denial, as far as inconsistent application of the published standards, comes up as a point of contention so often that i've wondered if the system is actually automated to some extent. i know that there was work a few years ago on applications that were supposed to provide Internet filtering/censorship based on an image analysis... Like software facial recognition, it was far, far from perfect, but it worked reasonably well under fixed circumstances. It's hard to imagine they have the staff to human-scan the volume of images this site must generate. Kinda explains the no-appeals policy as well, although then you'd think that would be encouraged for the purpose of improving heuristics... i dunno. Just tossing it out there. If so, a little playing with contrast, color levels, and sharpness could slide it through. Could be an interesting experiment. Or it could make them really cranky i am surprised that the Administrative Announcements subforum isn't used as an interactive Forum Help subforum, though... between the photo disputes, the TOS technicality questions, the "oh noes this person sucks, can i have them kicked off", and, God help me, the ice cream cone, it might clean up communications a bit.
|