samboct
Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
|
In another forum, I posted a New York Times article which used a lot of BDSM language accurately to describe the interplay between Hilary and the boys. The author, Maureen Dowd, points out that Hilary and Giuliani are both dominants, but Obama is a submissive.
I just commented that I thought that neither Giuliani nor Hilary would make a good president, and I suspect that its for many of the same reasons that Dowd characterized them as both dominants. After a bit of further mulling, I decided that I'd pick Obama out of the three to do the best job as president, however, since it will come up sooner or later- my personal choice out of the candidates running is Dodd. (Hell, I'm from Connecticut. The world would be a far better place today if the lousy people of Tennessee would have voted for their own native son in 2000.) And I'm really annoyed with the mainstream media (MSM) who keep trying to narrow the choices to the front runners- just because they're morons, doesn't mean the rest of us have to follow along.
So in the spirit of fun- how would you characterize the current candidates running in terms of BDSM types (dom/domme, submissive, or switch) and do you think there's a relationship between this type of individual and their capabilities as potential president?
Sam
|
Who would make a better Pres- a domme or submissive? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread