Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut!

Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

farglebargle -> Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 9:51:42 AM)
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2007/12/01/2007-12-01_city_taxpayers_picked_up_tab_for_judith_-1.html Driving out to pennsylvania. Walking the dog. And how the hell do you buy a house from someone without reporting the selling price to the county recorder???

Owner59 -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 10:04:37 AM)
There`s no proof that money went to her.He had to have the cops there ,even if it was to visit his gumada. My issue,and it was at the time,was Clinton being attacked over one blow job(according to the Starr Report,it was one blow job),while the republicans ignored their man in NYC`s fucking around,along with every other republican leader.

farglebargle -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 10:06:44 AM)
SHE didn't need the cops there when SHE went to visit her folks. And walking the dog? The whole "Bernie Kerrick said she needed it", is a huge red-flag, seeing what a piece of shit Kerick turned out to be.

Owner59 -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 10:14:01 AM)
Heard a talking blond claim today(on Mcglothlin), that Hillary is behind this story.lol.

HaveRopeWillBind -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 10:32:37 AM)
This is likely going to be the issue to pull the rug from under Gulianni's campaign.

cyberdude611 -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 10:33:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 There`s no proof that money went to her.He had to have the cops there ,even if it was to visit his gumada. My issue,and it was at the time,was Clinton being attacked over one blow job(according to the Starr Report,it was one blow job),while the republicans ignored their man in NYC`s fucking around,along with every other republican leader. 1. Did Rudy lie about it under oath? 2. Did Rudy provoke others to lie about it under oath? 3. Did Rudy try to obstruct the investigation? It wasn't the act...it was the cover-up that doomed Clinton.

Owner59 -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 10:54:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 There`s no proof that money went to her.He had to have the cops there ,even if it was to visit his gumada. My issue,and it was at the time,was Clinton being attacked over one blow job(according to the Starr Report,it was one blow job),while the republicans ignored their man in NYC`s fucking around,along with every other republican leader. 1. Did Rudy lie about it under oath? 2. Did Rudy provoke others to lie about it under oath? 3. Did Rudy try to obstruct the investigation? It wasn't the act...it was the cover-up that doomed Clinton. 2. Did Rudy provoke others to lie about it under oath? 3. Did Rudy try to obstruct the investigation? Starr`s report, shows no evidence of this.Read up. Neo-cons only think it`s lying,when it`s under oath.So unless and until that happens,the sky`s the limit.That`s the level of integrity, neo-cons have.lol There`s a big difference. One lie,was in a deposition,of a frivolous,private law suite(perjury trap).No one died.Get it?No dead guys...... The other lie(s)by Bush,have resulted in a clusterfuck.A very expensive,deadly clusterfuck. Thanks neo-cons. Guess I`m getting my answer about mis-placed outrage,and selective outrage. BTW,if you cheat on your wife,as Rudy did for years in an on-going affair,you can`t not lie.It`s impossible to get through the week without lying to someone,when you`re cheating continuously.It`s still lying,even when not under oath.

cyberdude611 -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 11:41:36 AM)
Its not against the law to lie unless you are under oath. That's just how it is. You can tell a gigantic and devastating lie to the public. And you can tell a small insignificant lie under oath. Which one do you get in trouble for? The little one. But Clinton put himself in that situation and has only himself to blame. The main reason he lied was not because he was married. He lied because they were trying to prove a pattern of behavior that might suggest the likihood he sexually harrassed Paula Jones. In sexual harrassment, rape, or sexual misconduct cases, the personal lives of the people involved comes into great scrutiny. Look at the Kobe Bryant case for example. They dived into Kobe's past as well as the accuser's, and it turns out the accuser had practically no credibility and might even have some mental health issues. Had Kobe lied about his past or current relationships, he would have gotten into more trouble. And the accuser would have had a strong case in civil court.......like Paula Jones. It sucks but that's just how the justice system works. It's a judgement of credibility. And once you lie one time, your credibility is lost and you lose the advantage. As for Bush....put Bush in front of congress and put him under oath about Iraq. The Democrats have that ability and power, but they wont do it. Don't blame the GOP for the gutlessness and shortcomings of your own party. The very minute Democrats grab control of Congress Nancy Pelosi declares there will be no investigations into the Bush administration. The GOP isn't to blame for that.

farglebargle -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 4:18:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: cyberdude611 quote: ORIGINAL: Owner59 There`s no proof that money went to her.He had to have the cops there ,even if it was to visit his gumada. My issue,and it was at the time,was Clinton being attacked over one blow job(according to the Starr Report,it was one blow job),while the republicans ignored their man in NYC`s fucking around,along with every other republican leader. 1. Did Rudy lie about it under oath? 2. Did Rudy provoke others to lie about it under oath? 3. Did Rudy try to obstruct the investigation? It wasn't the act...it was the cover-up that doomed Clinton. Yeah, he took a MARRIAGE OATH before G-d and everyone else, which he lied about.

luckydog1 -> RE: Rudy shouldn't have used NYC $ to pay for his Homewrecking Slut! (12/2/2007 4:22:42 PM)
Farg, and he paid the penalty for breaking that oath right? Or do you want some sort of legal sanction for violating a tennent of the Catholic Church?

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

3.222656E-02