TheSheepy -> RE: use of more formal speech common? (12/4/2007 10:06:56 PM)
|
I am wondering if it is remotely possible to hear in a face-to-face conversation how a person spells their words in their head. That is, of course, assuming the rest of the world has little subtitles going in their minds as they speak. I know several people, some of whom finished medical school (one even teaches English), who use abbreviations in texting and typed messages, mostly prompted by the company that makes their phone. The companies set the 'intuitive typing' to jump to widely accepted abbreviations first, which becomes the status quo for typing. This is a huge culture shift, and one that I do not personally believe is helping anyone learn to communicate or spell better. However, if we are talking about voice patterns and speech, which I believe we are, then none of that matters. Formal speech is commonly seen in situations in which a person is dealing with different social ranks. That is why we call it formal. Stepping into this mode of speech when dealing with someone of much lower rank is no different from the way that other animals express higher social rank. The voice change gets the same explaination for men. It is a show of masculinity and rank. Your posture likely changes, with the feet spread more than usual, shoulders pulled further back, and head held higher. Bet you notice more now that I have pointed something else out. [;)] Final Note- It would behoove anyone who wishes to make snide remarks about the military to not do so in public forums for a community that has high amounts of both active and veteran soldiers, as well as those civilians who support thier causes. I do not believe in certain aspects of the current war, but we need these men and women to support and protect us, and if they get called up for a cause they didn't want to fight for, they have no choice but to go. The least I ask of you is to support the troops, as they don't choose our wars. Elected officials do that, then our boys get to go fight for them.
|
|
|
|