The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


stella41b -> The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 10:45:08 AM)

The questions it seems are as old as the hills. Where can I find a Mistress? Why can't I find a Domme? Why won't anyone reply to me?

The answer is simple. BDSM is like a game of chess. Like chess, many people are drawn to BDSM. Like chess, BDSM fascinates them. Chess is not an easy game, there are easier games, for chess requires thinking, planning, a good strategy and above all, a good awareness of your opponent. A successful D/s or BDSM relationship is exactly the same, it also requires thinking, planning, a good strategy, and above all, a very good awareness of your partner.

The rules of the game of chess appear very simple.. you have a black and white checkered board made up of sixty four squares on which at either end each player plays with sixteen pieces - pawns, a King, a Queen, bishops, knights and castles. Each piece moves in a particular way, and there are very simple rules. So too the same can be said in a relationship between a Domme and a submissive, you have a dominant female, a submissive of either gender, a relationship, protocols, etiqette, and there are no rules per se as in chess, but principles which are simple and are to be followed. But the rules? I never wrote that chess is the same as BDSM, just similar. The rules are where chess and BDSM differ. In chess both players are bound equally by the rules as both Dominant and submissive are bound by the principles of BDSM or D/s (if you choose to make the distinction, BDSM I use here as an umbrella term), but unlike chess it is the Domme who makes up the rules which you are to follow.

It should be easy, but it isn't. Chess is a game with different levels of skill and strategy, and you can only really enjoy a good game of chess with someone who is on your level. The same is true of BDSM, in that you can only really find deep fulfillment and happiness with a partner on a similar level of awareness and skill and knowledge as you. You can play chess with someone of a different level if you are prepared either to learn or teach them, but it requires patience. The same can be said for any BDSM relationship.

However both chess and BDSM have one thing in common - nobody really wants to play with a 'woodpusher', i.e. one who doesn't think, who doesn't have any sort of strategy, and who isn't really that aware of the other person.

And so you have managed to find the interest of a Domme, does this mean....? Yes, it means that she is open, and therefore you can set up the board and arrange the pieces. She - the Domme, plays black, and you, the submissive, you play white. This is where so many submissives have problems. Some set up the pieces and disappear, perhaps to another game they have been playing with someone else. Uh uh. BDSM and chess are very similar. There are two people involved, and both chess and BDSM require your full concentration and attention.

The other mistake is that many submissives at this stage will want to go for the endgame, that moment of checkmate. Uh uh. Chess is a game of strategy and skill which involves movements made between two players in turn, and it is a game which involves an opening, a middlegame and an endgame. The same can be said to be true when developing a relationship with a Domme, there has to be an opening, a middlegame and an endgame. There is however a major difference. Unlike chess, where both players are competing and the game is equal, in a relationship with a Domme you as a submissive should not be competing, and definitely by the endgame she, the Domme, should be fully in control and moving quickly towards checkmate. Isn't this what you as a submissive want?

Chess and BDSM are the same in that they are to be studied if you are to become skilled in either, at least to the point of having a good opening strategy and being able to think in terms of tactics. In chess we talk of key pieces and key squares, over which as a player with white pieces you are to quickly establish control. The same can be said of the BDSM relationship you wish to develop with a Domme, only there are no squares or pieces, only elements of the relationship and signals exchanged between the two of you. There are hundreds of different chess openings, for example the Ruy Lopez Opening, the Sicilian Defense, the Sokolsky Opening, the Queen's Fianchetto to name but a few. And you as a submissive must have a similar opening strategy.. However there are no established BDSM Opening Strategies for Dommes, there is no Houseboy Opening, no Sissy Maid Defense, or Footslave Fianchetto.. you only have your own imagination to create and develop your own strategy.

Whatever happens, you make the first move in the opening, and you must always wait for her response. Here you are the active one, you take the lead, you make the moves, and she responds by making her moves. The idea is the same as in chess, you the submissive are sizing up your Domme, and she is sizing you up. You are opening up her formation, and thus you are trying to get to know her, find out about as much as you can about her as a person, and you find out about her needs, her dreams, her requirements, her expectations, her thoughts, her feelings, and everything about her. At the same time you are laying yourself open to her, exposing yourself to her (well, no, sorry, revealing yourself to her - I forgot that different types of men come to these boards), and letting her know about you. Now is not the time for submission.. for she has no need for a weak submissive.. Therefore you must take care not to put your pieces in a vulnerable position and you should try and maintain your pawn formation, and allow her to do the same. Unlike chess, no pieces are taken either side at this point, the idea is to get her to open up and move all her pieces round the board without threatening her Queen, King, bishops or knights.

Having laid the game wide open, it is you as the submissive, playing white, you move towards the middlegame. This is where it starts to look different from the actual game of chess. You are not playing to win, or are you? These are when you make the final moves in that dominant position, where you can see her weaknesses, vulnerabilities, and without exploiting them, you firmly make your offer of submission, and await her response. This doesn't mean you fall to your knees and beg to be beaten or tied up. She is not yet your Mistress, nor are you yet her submissive. The skilled and aware Domme will allow you to get this far without any inhibitions or restrictions.. for she is highly intelligent, sensitive, knowledgeable and aware.. She is nobody's fool, and each time you made a move she was watching you like a hawk. And so you, the submissive, now move your pieces into vulnerable positions, without being too obvious. This means you don't place your queen on a square diagonal to a bishop, or next to a castle. Some say submission is a gift, I disagree. No Domme wants a submissive who comes cheap or for free. All Dommes want a valuable, precious submissive, one who knows their value. Your pieces should be vulnerable without it being apparent, and your offer of submission should be just that, an offer, one which requires her modification and her input. You are in this relationship together, it is a dance, both of you must dance to the same tune with coordinated steps, and just like in chess, the relationship, like the game, is to be developed together in unison.

Does she respond? How? Let's hope she doesn't lay her King down on one side, or worse, get up and leave the game. This can happen, especially in the online world of the Internet, and it is something you should be prepared for and allow for. However normally she will make the moves and here for the first time take the initiative, and decide to start the endgame. In reality, she has accepted your offer of submission, modified it, and presented it back to you. Your offer has become her rules, and from this moment on you are playing to her rules. Meanwhile on the chessboard she has started to take your pieces and break up your pawn formation. This is where your submission begins, under her control, and her rules. Submission is a process. achieved under her control, and during this process you are expected to make all your words become actions. You are now dancing to her tune. You should be prepared for her, and how she plays her game, and what her strategy is, and be ready for it. Were you paying attention during the opening? She may decide to draw out this process of submission, taking your pieces, piece by piece, until you are left with nothing but a King and a pawn, or she may decide to suddenly bring about checkmate with a well timed move involving Queen and bishop, and you suddenly have nowhere to move your King. What does it matter anyway? She is the Mistress, you are the sub.

And you may kiss the hand of your Queen.

Your thoughts and comments please. Are there any Dommes out there who wish to add to the above and offer advice for those submissives to help them 'develop a strategy' and better tactics?




LadyHibiscus -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 11:26:56 AM)

I am absymal at chess, but thank you, Stella, for another finely presented and well thought out post!




Stephann -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 12:12:44 PM)

Disclaimer:  This is just my opinion, in my experiences, and has no value for you, the reader.

Hi Stella,

So... I don't mind showing my ass here.  That was just a tad over my head.

I don't like complicated relationships.  You wouldn't think it, when you read some of my posts, but I like to be happy, I like to laugh, I like to enjoy simple things in life, with people who I love.

I don't want to approach any relationship like I'm walking on glass.  I'm sure there are lots of male submissives who do; this isn't any bad on them.  Yet, I think that if a relationship is to last in the long term, it has to come from comperable goals.

My understanding and experience with male submissives is that more than half are already involved with a vanilla woman (not to say this is a bad thing, or unjustifiable; many male dominants are the same.)  The trouble is that they crave a relationship with a domina that enables their particular kink or fetish to be satisfied (food slaves, sissy slaves, toilet slaves, etc.)  They're so desperate to get that one fetishized kink met, that they're even willing to pay for it; this isn't the basis of a healthy, long term emotional interaction.  It does become a supply/demand oriented relationship.

So, removing the supply/demand relationship seekers from the equation, we're left with the men who are seeking relationships of varying levels.  Some are looking for short term, others long term, and still others in between.  The spectrum of desires and needs vary as widely on all sides of the orientation game; again this isn't a judgment that any one type of relationship is better.  It's pointing out that if you want a long term TPE relationship, settling for a short term domina or dominatrix is not only going to be unsatisfying, but indeed reduces the prospects of finding a long term partner.  In the vanilla world, if a man confesses to a woman he's just recently met that he usually goes to an escort to get his relationship fix, it's a safe bet he's going to have trouble explaining it.  The same goes for the female dominant; in telling a prospective long term male submissive that you have two or three houseboys doing your laundry and dishes until the right long term submissive comes along, you're likely to leave him with a bad taste in his mouth.  Settling for the 'right now' relationship simply makes finding the right person, in the long run, much more complicated, even if you consider yourself to be poly.

I think the rush to be 'with someone' overwhelms our senses and sensibilities, and leaves us miserably unhappy in the long run.  Being with someone right, and being willing to open up to new people, as people and not just the next kink fix, is the key to healthy relationship building.

Stephan




Lashra -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 12:25:43 PM)

I am going to be very unscientific but, I met my sub in an online game when I was not looking. lol For me that is how it always has happened, when I'm seeking a sub I cannot find one, when I am not POOF there they are. Sometimes I think its just chance, although I do think going to munches and other lifestyle events can help in the search. Online sites is another tool someone can use to meet up with others.

One thing that I do not like is when someone contacts me and starts to ask all sorts of private, sexual questions right off the bat. To me that is a total turn off. If I want a person to know those things I will tell them. The fact of the matter is each Domme is different and what will attract one will turn another off. But one thing I have found that most Dommes enjoy is corresponding/meeting someone articulate, intelligent, sensitive and who has COMMON SENSE. This would mean not coming to a meeting with your cock hanging out or a rubber mask on your face while in the middle of Starbucks. It would mean not sending emails of cock shots or demanding she watch you on a cam.

So common sense, manners and patience are 3 biggies that attract me, I am sure that others out there find them attractive as well.

~Lashra




IamJustMe2C -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 12:44:50 PM)

Stella,
I to am going to show my ass a bit here but in a different sort of way. GET OUT OF MY HEAD.  

I have always compaired the BDSM lifestyle to CHESS what did you do come to one of my lectures? If you did and you made my lecture into one of your own then good for you you have done a wonderfull job of it. If this came out of your own head again Good for you. This does not go for just Dommes and slaves/subs it goes for all genders.

It is not just the BDSM comunity though that is like CHESS it is any and all relationships. This is just what is known as LIFE and part of life some who play the game well will strive at it and like the game. Those who struggle with this game will hate it but they will play because it is life and they must play to find a mate. They will normally settle on the first one that they sit sown with and play the game with but again this is LIFE.
And yes life sucks




LadyChef -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 3:26:22 PM)

Although I am not a chess player...this hit the relationship nail right on the head.[:D]




ItalianSMistress -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 5:11:32 PM)

Ds is a lot like a good game of chess.  There is always one person in control and if they are smart, they stay there by having many moves planned but only using the one that will keep them in control based on the other persons move. If someone makes a very stupid move, without thinking it thru, then its game over, no matter how many men you have left on the board. 
 
 
 
This was something I wrote in My blog a few weeks back,,,that is where part of My signature line comes from, although it was too long to post it all.




Politesub53 -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 5:42:16 PM)

Stella, if you are black, and the white Queen allows you to make her first two moves, then you can call checkmate ( Its not possible for white to mate in 2 moves ) If you dont take your chance, all is lost.

As a mere pawn all one can do is move forward a square at a time. This is grossly unfair in my view, as the Queen can whizz around the board, north to south, east to west , and all directions in between.

Yet still you plod forward square after sqaure, the initial enthusiasm of jumping two squares taken right out of you. Them a magic moment, there she is, straight a head, the magnificent Queen, yet you cant take her, or make her yours, as she wont move a step to the said. And it gets worse, before you know it she is off, daring left or right, up or down, even on the diagonal. Then it arrives, the end game, you are still ploding forward and WHAM, before you know it she takes you from behind !!

It just aint fair is it. [8D]




Raechard -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 5:49:24 PM)

With your pawn you can always take the queen from behind en passantly . You have also forgotten the true role of the pawn; to rescue the queen and her war cabinet by making it to the far side of the board. Yes we would all like to take a queen from behind.
The first rule of chess club is you don't talk about chess club because people will beat you up.

edit: bad spell no




PsyVamp -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 6:29:19 PM)

Stella,
Your understanding of the whole D/s  dance always astounds me.
I completely adored every word because it seems like you had looked into my head and blown away the cobwebs to describe the way I feel about the communication process.

LJ (Psy)




laurell3 -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 6:30:43 PM)

This chess talk is very oddly erotic....




slavekal -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 6:34:59 PM)

I'm more of a Scrabble person.  CUCKOLD gets you a fifty point bonus.  Also SUBMITS, WHIPPED, SMOTHER, and TRAMPLE.  SLAVERY works as well.




TNstepsout -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 6:53:00 PM)

Nicely written. Except now I am worried. I am terrible at chess.




Boondoggle -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/7/2007 10:15:50 PM)

I guess it's my turn to stick my ass out.

I think that is a wonderfully written and thought provoking post. I, however, disagree, almost entirely.

First, I should point out that I dislike chess, a lot. I think it's a game full of pretense (and I mean the game, not the culture) because of the roles assigned to the pieces, and arbitrary rules for each different role which bring about an artificial complexity. With these vast constraints, there is no strategy, and that's poor game design. Good game design comes from simple, consistent rules that lead to complexity and strategy through interactions. Needless to say, I don't want relationship to be artificially complex because of imposed, inconsistent rules. Maybe some people are into that, but I'm decidedly not.

I also don't like the comparison of a relationship, any part of it, to a game. Games are, by definition, competitive and adversarial. While that certainly may be fun in a relationship in the context of a game, I don't want that to be the context of the entire relationship. I view finding a relationships as collaborative efforts between two (or more) people trying to determine if there are enough compatibilities and few enough incompatibilities to make it work. As well, I think the a relationship involves a similar process, one that is more refined and on a much finer scale, however, as people bring their lives into some state of union. I think a puzzle metaphor is much more fitting than one of a strategy game.

In fact, this puzzle is one that comes to mind when conjuring the metaphor. (If you're unfamiliar with the puzzle, take a look at the solutions pdf to see the possibilities.) In fact, it makes me want to go find out whatever happened to my set from junior high.

Ben

PS. [Geekery] As far as actual strategy games, I recommend Go. It's been around longer than chess, has much simpler rules and much more complex strategies. It's said to take 'minutes to learn and a lifetime to master.' It's been shown to use both sides of the brain, requiring creativity and logic, whereas chess is purely logical. It has simple, straight-forward rules that allow players of any different skill level to compete evenly. The game ends when both players agree that there are no more productive plays to be made, no sooner, no later, no stalemates (though there can be ties). The game is too complex for even Big Blue: the best computer algorithms can only compete at an amateur level. The goal isn't to eliminate the other army, it's to capture the most land. Last, but certainly not least, I think playing the game feels much more organic and less artificial. [/Geekery]




AFlyInYourWeb -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/8/2007 6:57:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

The answer is simple. BDSM is like a game of chess.

Your thoughts and comments please. Are there any Dommes out there who wish to add to the above and offer advice for those submissives to help them 'develop a strategy' and better tactics?


I happen to love chess, and have been playing chess since I was eight.  The game taught me many things, some of which you have detailed in your well-written essay.

The most important lessons chess taught me were patience and persistence

It took me three years to win my first game.  My father and his brothers were not from the "let the kid win one to make him feel better" school.  As combat veterans, they believed victory needed to be earned through hard work and sacrifice to have any meaning.

It was well worth the wait.  The moment of my first victory is one of the sweetest memories I have.

Patience and persistence are good qualities to have in any human endevour, but are especially valuable qualities to bring into a D/s relationship. 




hardbodysub -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/8/2007 4:27:54 PM)

In chess you're trying to beat the other player, so, as in most games, it's a win/lose proposition. The tactics and strategy in such games also involve deception, at least when they're played well. I don't like those concepts being applied to relationships, where you should be honest and open, and working toward a win/win situation.

My one caveat is that the dominant partner may appropriately employ manipulative tactics in a D/s relationship, if it works for both people.

This reminds me of the recent Jon Stewart/Chris Matthews interview. Matthews wrote a book which I think was titled "Life is a Campaign", or something like that, in which he basically says to be successful in life you have to approach it in the same way as a campaign. A lot of packaging yourself to make other people think you're what they want, a lot of maneuvering, marketing and selling yourself to get what you want. Stewart said (and I agree) that it seems to be a recipe for sadness. I think living your life the way Matthews suggests is a good way to win the battles but lose the war. You might appear to be successful but you can lose your self.





UBERMUNSCHIST -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/8/2007 8:44:03 PM)

I have learned a lot from this post, thank you.




LadySeraphina -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/8/2007 9:05:20 PM)

I personally loathe the game, largely due to my ADHD. I loved this post, however. While noting that I am flexible and understanding in general, I will be posting a link to this thread in my journal, because a boy approaching me would do well to have some idea of what you describe, Stella.

Lady Seraphina




Lureaetagg -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/9/2007 7:59:46 PM)

So I abosolutely loved the post. I love chess and I use it constantly as a source to define situtations but have never used it in this situtation. This is without a doubt brillant.




painInTheRomance -> RE: The Queen must never be checked or taken when trying to win the Domme (12/10/2007 2:32:36 AM)

I play a lot of chess.
Thank you for a nice comaparison, well written.
However, your analogy fails a bit in its assertion that the object is to 'get to the endgame', if one is seeking a D/s life partner. Noone wants it to end, the middle game should last and last.
- Unless, by endgame you mean the strap. LoL. And remeber, there is little 'edge play' on a cheesboard.

-loki




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875