|
NeedToUseYou -> RE: Ron Paul/amero/NAU (12/14/2007 6:27:54 PM)
|
I'm constantly suprised how the "officials" are so unaware of the theories surrounding their positions and organizations. It's odd that a politician wouldn't be aware of the North American Union theory, or an official working in a transportation field would never have heard of the Nafta highway(as it's now being referred to). I mean this stuff has been around for awhile now and those very people would get a kick out of the theory the most if unfounded. I mean, I don't go to Alex Jones website, I don't join conspiracy websites, and I've heard of it, and I'm not in a position to where I should be the first to hear about it. They don't have to believe it, but the thought that someone in the middle of the whole thing would not be aware of theories pertaining to their organization, tends to lead me to the conclusion that
A. they are really really separated and out of touch with the public.
B. They are just saying they never heard of it, to belittle the idea.
Either explanation is disturbing.
"Texas Transportation Commissioner Ric Williamson says he's startled by superhighway fears. He tells NEWSWEEK he had never heard of a North American Union until people started badgering him about it. "They say, 'Is this part of the NAU and the amero?' … And I say, 'What the hell are you talking about?' "
It reminds me of Rudy saying he never heard of the blowback theory, but at the same time claiming 9/11. Well, is it even possible to be an expert in 9.11 and never heard of the theory that they attacked us, because we were in Saudi Arabia, the sanctions on Iraq etc.. Again, not a new theory, the same as the North American Union is not a new concept floating around. But the very people that claim to be at the heart of the issue. (9.11 and transportation commisioner), claim at the same time to being ignorant of common theories pertaining to what they are an expert in. Being aware of a theory is not the same as endorsing it.
Personally, I don't know if the North American Union is an official goal, or the Nafta Highway is a real project, or if blowback was the primary cause for 9.11. What I do know is that anybody involved in those areas where a theory is proposed, and the theory is very popular should have knowledge of it, if they have any amount of communication within the organization. I just don't buy that they've never heard of it. If they never heard of it, they must not talk to anybody or look up anything related to their field in the news. LOL.
It just doesn't make sense.
And on the topic, no one is going to come out and say the goal is for a North American Union, "officially". That wouldn't happen even if the theories are true for decades. However, small steps would take place all the time. Whether it is an :"official" policy or just merely an ideology moving towards that direction, I think it is clear that we are and have been moving towards a greater integration with Canada and Mexico. When does that integration become a North American Union would be in the eye of the beholder.
JMO.
|
|
|
|
