chellekitty
Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sammiebabygirl OK. I will rephrase the question. I am talking about sharing sexually. More specifically, if your pet/sub/slave, etc. was bisexual, would you share him or her with a Dominant to fulfill that need, if that is what he or she desired? jen i would think that if an s-type were bisexual and they wanted to be able to have sex with the opposite gender of their Dominant (not all do...bisexual doesn't automatically mean that they want to have a poly or open relationship) they would make sure they were with a compatible Dominant, ie, one that wanted them to have sex with somoene of the opposite gender ("doesn't mind" can get hairy....and in my not so humble opinion is only partially compatable)...so sharing is a non-issue...the "who" and the "when" might be an issue...but the "if" and "will" is not....the same goes for monosexual s-types who just want to be able to have sex with more than one person, it is a compatiblity issue....it is not about the Dominant not being able to fulfill the s-type anymore than a Dominant having more than one s-type is about the s-type not being able to fulfill the Dominant... chelle edited to add: oh yea, and more sustinctly - it is individual...
< Message edited by chellekitty -- 12/16/2007 8:38:04 AM >
_____________________________
One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer
|