Pavel
Posts: 308
Joined: 1/10/2005 From: Washington Status: offline
|
I think I've been pretty clear that I'm a Robot Jesus man. If you want a poltical leaning, I've really given up trying to stick myself into one boot or the other. The closest I've gotten to a party/area that most lines up with my beliefs is the left wing of the republican party. I do hate how both parties have gotten very deep into moral issues, rather than issues of the state. I have no clue why it matters who marries who, or what I watch on TV, I'd really rather see coherent educated policy. Which returns to my continued comments on the importance of education. I happen to hold education as the highest pursuit someone can have in life. I do recognize that one cannot know everything. However, if you're going to support a man for control of one of the most powerful nations in the world, I believe you should know more than just gut feelings and sound bites. As the case is I believe I've learned enough about all the major canidates, and all of the more vocal minor folks to know that none of them are people I would pick willingly to lead my country. Unless something dramatic happens, I'm either entering Robot Jesus, or I'm doing what I did in 2004, and picking what I viewed as the lesser of two evils. And I'll feel just as dead on the inside when I cast that vote. I support a strong and involved foreign policy, because we no longer live in a world that can end at the ocean's edge, or where Canada and Mexico begin. We can try to disengage from the world, but I assure you, the world is too close, and too connected to work in a way Ron Paul believes is possible. There is much wrong with our international relations. There's also lots and lots wrong with very nearly everything our government is involved in. It's still to support an isolationist stance just because you're sick of paying for it. I for one, am sick of paying for farming subsidies, welfare, and social security. However I do not seek for those things to be removed as I know they serve some good to some people, and there's more to them than just the waste. That of course, addresses the meat of what I've been trying to say all along. In short, I do not support Ron Paul, I do not believe he's a viable, let alone good choice to lead this country, and I think it's important to learn more about all canidates, rather than supporting the ones with PR machines, grassroots or no. As to the rest, I'll make it quick, as I've got things to get to tonight. A number greater than three people depend on my ethical judgement. I believe calling it a War For Terror cheapens the debate to jingoism, just as calling it a War on Terror does the same from the other way. We live in a world way too populated with slogans and little intelligent conversations. Ignorance remains an enemy. I'm really curious to how you got the information that police officers perform better when ignorant. If you can actually show me the source for that, I'll be more inclined to debate the issue. However, if that is the case, I have to wonder why most of the police officers I've known are so over-educated then. I would like an answer on the stormfront.org (correction to the .com, the last time I was there was for a research project back in college, my desire to view it again is limited) money though. As far as I know, as little as I support Clinton, she has yet to take money from Neo-Nazis. Chinese businessmen, maybe, but I happen to find nazis more questionable. If Ron Paul has gotten millions of dollars, surely he can turn down five hundred from white nationalists on princple.
|