Lordandmaster -> RE: Most literate U.S. cities (12/29/2007 6:15:29 AM)
|
Actually, there are very serious people who measure literacy. There are different kinds of literacy, and there are real tests and statistics available for people who are truly interested in the question--rather than in arguing about whether the North or the South is ruder. What I don't think you can measure in any quantitative way is "rudeness." And I made the point that just looking a city's universities isn't a good way to judge its literacy. I'd like to know what's going on OUTSIDE the universities. I said that before you did. You must have missed that. You know, you complain a lot that people don't respond accurately to what you say in your posts, but I don't see that you read particularly carefully yourself. I'll agree on one point though: whoever did this stupid survey couldn't have had a very solid methodology. Edited to add: Just for the record, since you're being a stickler about accuracy, .01% is 1 in 10,000. The population of the Boston metropolitan area is about 4 million. That means .01% of the population of the Boston area is 400. Please, way more than 400 people in Boston have ATTENDED the universities I listed. You're off by a good three orders of magnitude. quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn I said attended. Same old game with you ... responding to point that were never made. For all your attempts to pick nits, you seem to have missed to bigger point ... the foolishness of trying to measure something as fluid as literacy. I'm sure Level would tell you that in Houston, there is a little area of land starting right around Rice University, running north through the "upscale liberal club section", and ending in Allen Park, that would make you think everyone here has a graduate degree. There is also Big Mikey's Saloon and Gun Shop, wife beater optional. As would be the case in any city, in any country, anywhere in the world.
|
|
|
|