TallDarkAndWitty
Posts: 1893
Joined: 6/12/2004 From: Rochester, NY Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: chellekitty submissives under the same Master do not "always compete"... I imagine we are using the word "compete" to mean two different things. You are using it to mean something negative, with connotations of backstabbing, insecurity, and jealousy. I am using it to mean something neutral, with none of those negative connotations. A Master has a limited amount of dominant energy to spend. Unless he only acts dominant with both submissives, at all times, he must, at some point, spend his dominant energy on one submissive instead of the other. The submissives compete for this time. There may be rules and understandings that make this competition friendly, fun, healthy, and pre-determined, but the competition is still there. Unless the Master divides his energies into niches, where one slave always provides a certain duty (say footworship) where the other slave always provides another (say hblowjobs)...at that point it is not the slaves who compete, but rather the competition is between the Master's interests (does he want a foot rub or a blowjob). Humans compete...it is simply the way the world works. Taggard
< Message edited by TallDarkAndWitty -- 12/31/2007 10:26:45 AM >
_____________________________
A most rewarding compliment is an insult from the ill-informed. My slave: Kat (RainaVerene on the other side) and her website: RainaVerene.com
|