Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Can Bush do this?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Can Bush do this? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:09:31 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
Jesus Christ, I can tell many of you guys need to take a class in American government and constitutional law.

Term limits for the presidency cannot be "declared unconstitutional" since they are part of the constitution (25th amendment). The Supreme Court interprets the constititution, it cannot change it.

As for elections....please try to remember that the President of the United States is not directly elected by the people. The President is elected by the electoral college. If something were to happen where an election does not take place (or a winner is not decided), the 12th amendment states that the new president is chosen by the House of Representatives. The House goes into special session and each state caucus has one vote. The candidate with the majority of votes (26 votes in this case) would be elected president.
This happened once... in the election of 1824, Andrew Jackson won more electoral votes than any other candidate. But he failed to gain a majority of all possible electoral votes. So the House made the choice and elected John Quincey Adams.

We are a constitutional republic....NOT a democracy. It's been that way since 1790. The people don't elect the president. Your right to vote for president is given to you by your state constitution, not the federal government because the state is the one that places the votes in the electoral college. Your popular vote in each state determines which candidate gets those votes. This also assures that the states hold their power in the union. And that's why the electoral college will never be abolished. The states are never going to give up more power to the federal government.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:11:25 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

This happened once... in the election of 1824, Andrew Jackson won more electoral votes than any other candidate. But he failed to gain a majority of all possible electoral votes. So the House made the choice and elected John Quincey Adams.


Didn't the House decide the 1800 election too?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:20:25 PM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
Any one who thinks Bush will just calmly hand over the reins in Nov is nuttier then a fruit cake.

We are ramping up with Iran, who has Putin and the Russians behind him, and now Pakistan is totaly destablized... Which is Russia's old enemy and punching bag... We stand at the brink of World War 3 and Dubya and his minions are just the meglomaniac morons to push it. Google Dominionism... That has been his main cause of all he has done over these years in office. Now that he destablized the Middle East even more, and stired up Al Qaeda to be angier then a hornets nest this crazy idiot thinks to try to bring about the second comming by his antics. http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1587122,00.html If you know your bible well enough you can see that is what he is trying to do, esp after reading that.
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2004/07/16/quote_of_the_day.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html 

With what once was our only solid ally Pakistan going down in flames, and Bhutto dead ( she was very Pro US, and was in fact raised in the US ) we are screwed as far as it goes with Russia and Pakistan. While everyone was bitching about Illegals, and Gays... no one noticed that this stupid sumobitch re-opened up the cold war. Yeah.. Russia is pissed. We want to put missle bases all of the EU, but esp near Russia ( go fig right?) and Putin didnt take too kindly to it. We had Condi and her lil flying monkey go over and meet with Putin over the matters, he made them wait 45 mins, and then blew them off, minorly insulted them, and in a couple of days after Condi and her buddy left Iran.. Putin showed up in Iran to state that who ever messes with Iran, messes with Russia.

And finaly how the Republicans are stealing the vote in 08 ~using children as bait even....  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exdQ5mWaOLY

Gwyn


_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:23:47 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
Yes, but that was before the 12th amendment and it was because that election was a giant mess. You think the 2000 election was bad? 1800 was ugly in many more ways.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:30:29 PM   
Daddysredhead


Posts: 23574
Joined: 11/6/2005
From: Northern (yet still part of the South) Virginia
Status: offline
Aylee, Level...  tinfoil is not going to help us in this instance.

We have somehow been transported to the basement of the science building.  Titanium is the only way to go.

_____________________________

Founding Member, Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's

Do not challenge me to a battle of wits & come to fight unarmed.

Are you really that stupid? ~ Bless your heart

13th doughnut


(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:40:00 PM   
HaveRopeWillBind


Posts: 514
Joined: 7/15/2006
Status: offline
Cyber,
The amendment that added term limits was put in place by the Republican party after WWII because they wanted to prevent a Democratic President from being able to hold on to power as long as Roosevelt. In a strict sense regular elections by themselves should suffice in place of term limits. I could easily see the current Supreme Court declaring term limits to be provided for by the electoral process and therefore throwing out the 25th Amendment as being against the intent of the founding fathers. We have already seen power grabs by this administration on an equivalent level.

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:47:40 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
First off....Bush isnt out of office until January 21, 2009. November is simply when the next president is elected.

Second, we are not on the brink of WW3. Russia today is exactly the kind of country that Mikhail Gorbachev wanted the Soviet Union to turn into. He thought Russia would be stronger with more democratic elections and an open economy. He was right. But the Russians are not an enemy today nor will they be tomorrow. The leaders in Russia are not concerned with taking over the world with communism. The commies over there have morphed into capitalists and now they are more interested in making money than trying to win a war of ideas.

Third, Pakistan has been a mess much longer than when we started getting interested in it. Musharaf is a dictator that came into power by a bloody coup. It hasn't been a stable country for years. Bhutto should have never returned in my opinion that soon. We were on the right track by pushing Musharraf towards elections. But for her to go back and make deals with Musharraf, it angered people even in her own party. She should have waited for the next election cycle.

(in reply to Gwynvyd)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 5:55:48 PM   
cyberdude611


Posts: 2596
Joined: 5/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HaveRopeWillBind

Cyber,
The amendment that added term limits was put in place by the Republican party after WWII because they wanted to prevent a Democratic President from being able to hold on to power as long as Roosevelt. In a strict sense regular elections by themselves should suffice in place of term limits. I could easily see the current Supreme Court declaring term limits to be provided for by the electoral process and therefore throwing out the 25th Amendment as being against the intent of the founding fathers. We have already seen power grabs by this administration on an equivalent level.


The Supreme Court does not have the power to declare any part of the constitution unconstitutional.

(in reply to HaveRopeWillBind)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 6:03:24 PM   
CuriousLord


Posts: 3911
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ligar59

I was told that Pres Bush could declare Marshall law, which would suspend the elections indefinitely, thus allowing him to remain in office until he decided the "war" was over

Tell me that is not possible


Theoritically possible, but it sounds like conspiracy theory to me. If it happens, we'll deal with it, but I think the people talking about this are probably just trying to use fear tactics in their agenda. After all, Bush isn't the only idiot on Earth.

(in reply to ligar59)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 6:16:58 PM   
babygirl005


Posts: 146
Joined: 5/3/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd

Any one who thinks Bush will just calmly hand over the reins in Nov is nuttier then a fruit cake.

We are ramping up with Iran, who has Putin and the Russians behind him, and now Pakistan is totaly destablized... Which is Russia's old enemy and punching bag... We stand at the brink of World War 3 and Dubya and his minions are just the meglomaniac morons to push it. Google Dominionism... That has been his main cause of all he has done over these years in office. Now that he destablized the Middle East even more, and stired up Al Qaeda to be angier then a hornets nest this crazy idiot thinks to try to bring about the second comming by his antics. http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1587122,00.html If you know your bible well enough you can see that is what he is trying to do, esp after reading that.
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2004/07/16/quote_of_the_day.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html 

With what once was our only solid ally Pakistan going down in flames, and Bhutto dead ( she was very Pro US, and was in fact raised in the US ) we are screwed as far as it goes with Russia and Pakistan. While everyone was bitching about Illegals, and Gays... no one noticed that this stupid sumobitch re-opened up the cold war. Yeah.. Russia is pissed. We want to put missle bases all of the EU, but esp near Russia ( go fig right?) and Putin didnt take too kindly to it. We had Condi and her lil flying monkey go over and meet with Putin over the matters, he made them wait 45 mins, and then blew them off, minorly insulted them, and in a couple of days after Condi and her buddy left Iran.. Putin showed up in Iran to state that who ever messes with Iran, messes with Russia.

And finaly how the Republicans are stealing the vote in 08 ~using children as bait even....  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exdQ5mWaOLY

Gwyn



I think you are showing who is the fruitcake here. Bush sure flexed his muscles when the Democrats took over the Senate and Congress didn't he?
You guys are going to lose the next election the same way you lost the last two. By running poor candidates with no vision. You don't need any help.
Estring

< Message edited by babygirl005 -- 1/1/2008 6:18:56 PM >


_____________________________

i love my Master!!

(in reply to Gwynvyd)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 6:19:37 PM   
JohnSteed1967


Posts: 304
Joined: 5/29/2005
From: Columbia SC
Status: offline
Bush is corrupt, his whole family is corrupt.

You want to feel safe, want to feel better about your place in America. Then I wouldn't click on the following sites

http://web.archive.org/web/20041123092329/http://www.tackamarks.freeservers.com/
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html

yeah I am so sure Poppy Bush wants to keep us safe!


(in reply to Daddysredhead)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 6:22:36 PM   
Estring


Posts: 3314
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
Time for your medication maybe?

_____________________________

Boycott Whales!

(in reply to JohnSteed1967)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 6:47:23 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddysredhead

Aylee, Level...  tinfoil is not going to help us in this instance.

We have somehow been transported to the basement of the science building.  Titanium is the only way to go.


Why oh why do I never get the good drugs. 

I never get to hallucinate about all this wacko stuff!


I now have on my Titanium-beanie and Titanium-underoos!

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Daddysredhead)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 7:06:17 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Well at least one other person has studied the same civics things I have. It always baffles me how people can ignore the power of the Supreme Court, and do not understand the balance of powers written into the constitution. This is just one more senational thing, to cause fear in those that hate Bush. Those same people that seem to accuse others of using fear, in turn use it themselves. I see no difference in the cheerleaders from either side of the isle.


quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

Jesus Christ, I can tell many of you guys need to take a class in American government and constitutional law.

Term limits for the presidency cannot be "declared unconstitutional" since they are part of the constitution (25th amendment). The Supreme Court interprets the constititution, it cannot change it.

As for elections....please try to remember that the President of the United States is not directly elected by the people. The President is elected by the electoral college. If something were to happen where an election does not take place (or a winner is not decided), the 12th amendment states that the new president is chosen by the House of Representatives. The House goes into special session and each state caucus has one vote. The candidate with the majority of votes (26 votes in this case) would be elected president.
This happened once... in the election of 1824, Andrew Jackson won more electoral votes than any other candidate. But he failed to gain a majority of all possible electoral votes. So the House made the choice and elected John Quincey Adams.

We are a constitutional republic....NOT a democracy. It's been that way since 1790. The people don't elect the president. Your right to vote for president is given to you by your state constitution, not the federal government because the state is the one that places the votes in the electoral college. Your popular vote in each state determines which candidate gets those votes. This also assures that the states hold their power in the union. And that's why the electoral college will never be abolished. The states are never going to give up more power to the federal government.


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 7:49:39 PM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
Bush has taken some odd steps with this Martial Law thing, but the laws still have a time of emergency and restoration of order requirement.  Furthermore, Bush is commander in chief and the military will execute his commands but they are not blind robots.   If he tried to pulled out the Martial Law clauses the military wouldn't follow those orders for very long unless he came up with some really good justifications and it would be turned off in a matter of days (weeks at the longest).

Martial Law has been successful used in other countries to pull off a coup attempt, but those dictators had the full backing of the military in their efforts to overthrow the government.   Our military will not support such an effort to overthrow our government.

(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 7:55:27 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: christine1


After 8 years of BS from a democrat party that's hell bent on losing a war in order to improve their election prospects I'm sure he can't wait until January 2009.

No whining allowed when Manhatten, Phoenix or LA evaporates under an Iran built weapon.



oh, there is a voice of reason still....somewhere!


I knew I liked you!

(in reply to christine1)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 7:58:42 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline
I am giving $1000 to 1 odds that President Bush will not declare Marshall Law at the end of his term.

So all those fearfull handwringers who believe that he will....

Time to put you money where your mouth is.

(in reply to ligar59)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 7:59:30 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: christine1


After 8 years of BS from a democrat party that's hell bent on losing a war in order to improve their election prospects I'm sure he can't wait until January 2009.

No whining allowed when Manhatten, Phoenix or LA evaporates under an Iran built weapon.



oh, there is a voice of reason still....somewhere!

I knew I liked you!


It's deja vu all over again.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 8:26:07 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
We have left Crete and have now entered the de-milaterized zone!

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Can Bush do this? - 1/1/2008 8:47:12 PM   
Estring


Posts: 3314
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Muttling

Bush has taken some odd steps with this Martial Law thing, but the laws still have a time of emergency and restoration of order requirement.  Furthermore, Bush is commander in chief and the military will execute his commands but they are not blind robots.   If he tried to pulled out the Martial Law clauses the military wouldn't follow those orders for very long unless he came up with some really good justifications and it would be turned off in a matter of days (weeks at the longest).

Martial Law has been successful used in other countries to pull off a coup attempt, but those dictators had the full backing of the military in their efforts to overthrow the government.   Our military will not support such an effort to overthrow our government.



In your muddled thinking process you have forgotten one important fact. George Bush is not a dictator. He will step down after serving as President for the last eight years. How that makes him a dictator is beyond me.

_____________________________

Boycott Whales!

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Can Bush do this? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078