RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination

RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Jeffff -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:14:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Did she just tip over? I hadn't heard beyond her going to the hospital over some pneumonia a couple weeks ago.....I had thought it was from performing airstarts at 83 years old in the frigid LA smog............ Sammy the Bull Oops.........ok.....she isn't actually dead....... just kinda dry n brittle.......I am still not that kinky George Burns

camille65 -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:14:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Padriag quote: ORIGINAL: camille65 How then, does living by a set of rules change that? How does it prevent someone from the 'outside' from crying abuse? It won't, the only thing that will eventually "cure" that is familiarity. History is a clear teacher of that. Anytime someone or some group started doing things a new way or differently... that is in a way that was unfamiliar... there was resistance, ridicule and the occasional burning at the stake. People have a natural fear of the unknown, and that's not entirely unhealthy. That resistance to change is part of what allows societies to hold together and maintain a cultural identity. But change is inevitable, it happens, and its often at least a little painful... again, its just how it is. But look around, you see this lifestyle gaining more and more recognition, and with that gradually comes familiarity. Look at how much more widespread and accepted things are now than they were say 20 years ago... 50 years ago. Things have gotten better in very tangible ways. Are there still hurdle to get over, sure. Give it time and in the meantime be reasonably careful. I don't see this lifestyle as dying at all, I see it doing just the opposite, growing and thriving on an increasingly expanding scale and with increasing diversity. <snipped the rest I know that & have fully agreed with your posts in this thread , I just was hoping the OP would explain how it connected in her mind. [8D]

mnottertail -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:14:51 PM)
I have always wanted to fuck the dogshit outta Doris Day, but she died before I could....... Que SerFUCKINa Sera.....I guess. Ron

LaTigresse -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:16:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Did she just tip over? I hadn't heard beyond her going to the hospital over some pneumonia a couple weeks ago.....I had thought it was from performing airstarts at 83 years old in the frigid LA smog............ Sammy the Bull Oops.........ok.....she isn't actually dead....... just kinda dry n brittle.......I am still not that kinky George Burns Yes you are.......your just afraid to admit it cuz it's not old school. Breaking one of those brittle old bones wouldn't be safe sane or consentual......

Jeffff -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:17:19 PM)
and you KNOW she was a dirty whore too.....her..and Donna Reed....I would have banged the shit out of Donna Reed Jimmy Stewart

LaTigresse -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:18:28 PM)
Don't forget the flying nun.....

Shawn1066 -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:18:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong and Women seek Conan the Barbarian (intelligence optional) types. And just for the record...my inner nerd couldn't let this go... Conan the Barbarian is a very intelligent character in the original stories, the comics, and even in the movie(despite the fact he's very short on words). He's multilingual, capable of rather advanced reading, writing, and decyphering abilities. He's also a talented strategist, and a top-rate administrator. And yes, there was at least one story that I'm aware of where he had sadomasochistic leanings with a great love of his. God, I think we should make Conan president of Collarme! The preceding was paid for by the friends and supporters of Conan of Cimmeria.

Jeffff -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:18:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Did she just tip over? I hadn't heard beyond her going to the hospital over some pneumonia a couple weeks ago.....I had thought it was from performing airstarts at 83 years old in the frigid LA smog............ Sammy the Bull Oops.........ok.....she isn't actually dead....... just kinda dry n brittle.......I am still not that kinky George Burns Yes you are.......your just afraid to admit it cuz it's not old school. Breaking one of those brittle old bones wouldn't be safe sane or consentual...... Damnit.......BUSTED!!...do I have to resign now or something? Jeff

mnottertail -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:19:34 PM)
LOL this reminds me of Marshall Tito......they are digging his palatial grave outside his hospital room, it was in the news for weeks---- How is he supposed to feel? Oh, the whole country will think I am a shithead if I don't die after all this trouble they went to, now that; friends, is upholding traditional over contemporary values. Alistair Cooke

LaTigresse -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:21:09 PM)
No, 40 hours of "community" service at the old folks "Olde Guarde" home.

mnottertail -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:22:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Don't forget the flying nun..... I dont go for those perky cunts.....I like my women like I like my coffee: strong, black, and bitter....... Thos. Jefferson

LotusSong -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:23:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Darcyandthedark The only way you would avoid that, would for all relationships to stick to conventional views of what a relationship is - BDSM is not a set of rules it's a simple acronym. Agreed.. I was talking to the whole scope of D/s of which BDSM is a part but not an absolute quote: I again challenge you to define what the programme is. Again You aren't talking rules or structure but what everybody else defines and finds conventional. Seems you already have your own definition and set of rules :)

camille65 -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:23:38 PM)
My dog looks just like the flying nun when she takes off into the air. (Huge ears).

kitttty -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:23:43 PM)
Oh well. The thing I see at least on collarme is that people into the lifestyle actually do judge and they actually do have standards- they just contradict whatever they perceive mainstream society to value. There have been a number of comments about how thin women are unhealthy, gross etc, while continuous encouragement is given to accept people that are medically termed as 'morbidly obese' as beautiful. It is like pulling teeth to explain why dropping out of school to be a stripper/hooker is a bad idea for a smart girl, but my Master gets continuous flack for requiring me to get a 98th percentile score on my LSAT. If my master told me to take five more years to do menial jobs in order to find myself, then this would certainly be seen as a great idea though. People who value family and marriage are seen as naive, delusional and brainwashed while people who want to relocate and remain collared for a decade with no security blanket are defended in the name of 'don't judge their kink'. quote: For those that know me, part of my charm is my "certainty" :) It is quite likely that my charm is representing everything many kinksters cringe at. Or at least that's what the girls tell me.

Jeffff -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:25:21 PM)
ok.......now I have this picture of old drooling kinky people in leather asking me to change their diapers. I have discovered a new hard limit Jeff

Jeffff -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:26:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Don't forget the flying nun..... I dont go for those perky cunts.....I like my women like I like my coffee: strong, black, and bitter....... Thos. Jefferson Don't I know it!! Sally Hemmings

Shawn1066 -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:27:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kitttty Oh well. The thing I see at least on collarme is that people into the lifestyle actually do judge and they actually do have standards- they just contradict whatever they perceive mainstream society to value. There have been a number of comments about how thin women are unhealthy, gross etc, while continuous encouragement is given to accept people that are medically termed as 'morbidly obese' as beautiful. It is like pulling teeth to explain why dropping out of school to be a stripper/hooker is a bad idea for a smart girl, but my Master gets continuous flack for requiring me to get a 98th percentile score on my LSAT. If my master told me to take five more years to do menial jobs in order to find myself, then this would certainly be seen as a great idea though. People who value family and marriage are seen as naive, delusional and brainwashed while people who want to relocate and remain collared for a decade with no security blanket are defended in the name of 'don't judge their kink'. This...is very true of Collarme, yes.

LotusSong -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:28:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shawn1066 quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong and Women seek Conan the Barbarian (intelligence optional) types. And just for the record...my inner nerd couldn't let this go... Conan the Barbarian is a very intelligent character in the original stories, the comics, and even in the movie(despite the fact he's very short on words). He's multilingual, capable of rather advanced reading, writing, and decyphering abilities. He's also a talented strategist, and a top-rate administrator. And yes, there was at least one story that I'm aware of where he had sadomasochistic leanings with a great love of his. God, I think we should make Conan president of Collarme! The preceding was paid for by the friends and supporters of Conan of Cimmeria. yet, still a fictional character :)

ownedgirlie -> RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination (1/2/2008 12:29:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong About boxes... ever work in an office that didn't have assigned mail slots? Either the mail ends up in one big pile waiting for the recipient to find it or someone has to hand deliver it to each and every addressee which is rather a big waste of time and lays the responsibility on one person or department. Mail is simple. There is a name on it, and the name goes into its corresponding box without any thought. Humans are a bit more multidimensional than that so the "boxes" are very subjective, according to all sorts of determinants. Then again, there ARE "simple" boxes in which to put people without consideration for anything but their name or number. It's called prison.

RCdc -> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination (1/2/2008 12:30:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shawn1066 quote: ORIGINAL: LotusSong and Women seek Conan the Barbarian (intelligence optional) types. And just for the record...my inner nerd couldn't let this go... Conan the Barbarian is a very intelligent character in the original stories, the comics, and even in the movie(despite the fact he's very short on words). He's multilingual, capable of rather advanced reading, writing, and decyphering abilities. He's also a talented strategist, and a top-rate administrator. And yes, there was at least one story that I'm aware of where he had sadomasochistic leanings with a great love of his. God, I think we should make Conan president of Collarme! The preceding was paid for by the friends and supporters of Conan of Cimmeria. I was going to post something similar - Conan rocked. But I presumed the OP preferes stereotypes to reality. the.dark.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875