RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


MzMia -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:43:22 PM)

Your post was excellent.
What I am gathering here is many with NO roadmap, no guide and often no clue,
are mad because we DARE to know what we want and we DARE to ask, spell it out
and expect it!

How dare a Master have rules and expectations![:D]
 




juliaoceania -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:48:54 PM)

quote:

How does me being clear about what I expect, setting forth what my rules and expectations for anyone who gets involved with me negate "another whole human being with needs and desires of their own"?  It seems to me that rather than hinder that, it helps facilitate it.  If a dominant wants to regularly and severely flog a submissive and states this clearly up front, then any submissive who is unable to accept that knows right away to pass that dominant by.  If a submissive wants to be snuggled and held periodically, then it would be smart to find a dominant who indicates this is part of their "style" and avoid those dominants seeking "objects".



I agree that people should find other people they are compatible with.

quote:

What I did state is that a dominant, in my own strong opinion, should have some clear rules and expectations from the outset and be very clear about what these are to the best of their ability.  I went on to state, and this seems to be the sticking point, that said dominant should not bend about these rules and expectations, they should be fixed and firm so far as submissives are concerned.  That is not to say that if the dominant, upon some self reflection discovers his desires and wants have changed shouldn't change them... rather that they should not change them in the pursuit of an single submissive.



I agree, people should not compromise what they want in pursuit of another person..

I guess I think the same things apply to submissives as apply to dominants looking to be involved in a relationship... and I think we agree on that....




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:50:21 PM)

So now you're going to have to explain the difference between that and "I often can tell the difference these days between "lifestylers" and kinky vanilla people playing with whips, chains, handcuffs, costumes and sex toys. "?

In your previous post, you seem to suggest people playing without serious rules or standard are just "kinky vanilla" and here you come to a place where you celebrate people choosing to live a life as THEY choose, even if their rules and standards are "keep it laissez-faire."




juliaoceania -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:50:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

Your post was excellent.
What I am gathering here is many with NO roadmap, no guide and often no clue,
are mad because we DARE to know what we want and we DARE to ask, spell it out
and expect it!

How dare a Master have rules and expectations![:D]



I think one could substitute "submissive" with "master" and it would mostly apply to us too... how dare we have expectations, how dare we have deal breakers, how dare we know what we want.. in fact it is more prevalent for submissives to be told we are wrong for this than it is for dominants in my experience




MzMia -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:52:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

So now you're going to have to explain the difference between that and "I often can tell the difference these days between "lifestylers" and kinky vanilla people playing with whips, chains, handcuffs, costumes and sex toys. "?

In your previous post, you seem to suggest people playing without serious rules or standard are just "kinky vanilla" and here you come to a place where you celebrate people choosing to live a life as THEY choose, even if their rules and standards are "keep it laissez-faire."


Sigh, what I said is you CAN have rules, expectations and ALSO have a
laissez-faire attitude as KOM stated.
Why does one negate the other?
When did this lifestyle become so black and white?
I work with teenagers do you think it is IMPOSSIBLE to have both?




Padriag -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:52:57 PM)

I think that's a good observation and I agree that there is also probably some of that involved here.  Yes, I have a roadmap to where I am going... admittedly parts of it are sketched in crayon, a few areas are still blank, and others are done in a beautiful calligraphy.  All of which is a colorful metaphorical way of saying that I do have a very clear direction about some aspects of what I want, areas I've carefully thought out and detailed.  Other areas are less well examined, and some are still left to be explored.  I don't appologize for any of that.  It simply is what it is.




Padriag -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 7:57:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I agree, people should not compromise what they want in pursuit of another person..

I guess I think the same things apply to submissives as apply to dominants looking to be involved in a relationship... and I think we agree on that....

Don't think it... know it... we very much agree. [:)] 




Padriag -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:00:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

I think one could substitute "submissive" with "master" and it would mostly apply to us too... how dare we have expectations, how dare we have deal breakers, how dare we know what we want.. in fact it is more prevalent for submissives to be told we are wrong for this than it is for dominants in my experience

Sadly too often true.  Even sadder how often I note that it seems neither really knows what they want or how to express it.  Too many times its seemed like the blind leading the blind.  So it goes...




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:01:32 PM)

quote:

Sigh, what I said is you CAN have rules, expectations and ALSO have a
laissez-faire attitude as KOM stated.
Why does one negate the other?
When did this lifestyle become so black and white?
I work with teenagers do you think it is IMPOSSIBLE to have both?

I'm not the one who started the thread asking people if they did one or the other.  I'm not the one who initially said
""I often can tell the difference these days between "lifestylers" and kinky vanilla people playing with whips, chains, handcuffs, costumes and sex toys." and suggesting that you either have to be "lifestyler" or just "kinky vanilla playing around."

You set up a seeming conflict of perspectives.  I think it's been pretty clear for a long time that I advocate "do what works for you."  You are the one who set up the notion that it must be serious or just play- now you're trying to say that you find they can co-exist without a problem.

That's kinda like someone championing blacks all moving back to Africa for there to be peace and then suddenly saying "Nah, of course we can all live together happily!" 




MzMia -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:01:48 PM)

[;)] let's join hands
 
People can actually live and be the way they want, we don't have to agree
and it really is okay.




marieToo -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:14:40 PM)

FR:

I think there is a line between having standards, criteria, and expectations, and having specific "rules" for a submissive that are tailor-made to be as effective as possible with that particular submissive.  

The thread title (no offense to the OP) is posed in a way which invites confusion and a blurring of the lines, because specific "rules" are not necessarily the same as "expectations".   

Example: 

Expectation or Standard:  I expect my submissive to keep the house clean. 
 
Rule:  My submissive has to accomplish all her housecleaning chores on her day off work.

The above rule might be altered if the sub has a habit of skipping out on the chores because she doesn't like to do them,  Then the rule might be changed to:  She's not allowed to go shopping or socialize with friends until the chores are done. 
This would be an example of tailoring a rule to fit a submissive.  This doesn't mean the dom is compromising his standards, or changing his expectations to accomodate the sub,  it simply means he is altering the rule in accordance with her particular shortcomings, in order to effect the change and maintain his expectations.

I think everyone (doms and subs) need to have certain standards about what kind of relationship they want or expect to have.  When we are true to those standards, we tend to attract like-minded people.  After a relationship begins to develope and unfold between two like-minded people with similar standards, then the dom can see exactly where the submissive needs polishing in order to meet his specific expectations, and I think that's where the tailor-made rules have to come into play.  And every submissive is different too.  It's not like a dom should change what he wants in order to accomodate a submissive, but each relationship has a different chemistry to it, and what a dom wants from one submissive may not be the same as what he wants from the next or the last.  In structuring the rules of the relationship, there's got to be some consideration on the Dom's part with regards to the submissive's particular personality.  Absolute rigidity with no regard for the fact that you're dealing with individual human beings, most likely isn't going to get any dom very far.  




laurell3 -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:15:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

So now you're going to have to explain the difference between that and "I often can tell the difference these days between "lifestylers" and kinky vanilla people playing with whips, chains, handcuffs, costumes and sex toys. "?

In your previous post, you seem to suggest people playing without serious rules or standard are just "kinky vanilla" and here you come to a place where you celebrate people choosing to live a life as THEY choose, even if their rules and standards are "keep it laissez-faire."


Sigh, what I said is you CAN have rules, expectations and ALSO have a
laissez-faire attitude as KOM stated.

Why does one negate the other?
When did this lifestyle become so black and white?
I work with teenagers do you think it is IMPOSSIBLE to have both?


I agree with both you and KoM on this point and rules, expectations and ALSO a laissez-faire attitude work best for me.

I think we tend to see lifestylers in two camps sometimes, 1)clueless and no guidance, no rules (not me, quoting the above) or 2)rigid dogma that forgets the person involved and their desires.  Neither paint flattering pictures, however, like all these threads I am not sure having theory on any camp or set of rules for everyone ever works.  In that regard I agree with LA, do whatever works for you whether it be rules or lack thereof as long as it's what your partner finds acceptable and you do as well, do what works for you. 




Padriag -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:15:55 PM)

Eh... I'm not really into hand holding... unless it involves holding someone else's down. [sm=evil.gif]  But yes, we can all live as we like.  I mean honestly, if you don't like how I do things its not like any of you are going to show up and try to stop me.  And I can assure you, I won't be troubled in the least if any of you do things differently than me.  I may have academic debates and even disputes about it, but that's really all it amounts to... a little intellectual sparing.  Last I checked, that had never resulted in any injury more serious than a bruised ego.




MzMia -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:23:56 PM)

Great comments laurell and marietoo.
Often when we start a post, we don't give every single possible scenario.
In my OP, I probably should have only asked if the Dominants have rules and
expectations, period.

I agree that rules and expectations and reality all have to co-exist.
I would venture to guess that ALL of the Dominants that stated they have rules
{And many have over 50}, realize that life does NOT always follow rules and expectations.
 
We are all human beings and neither Dominant nor submissive is perfect.
You can have rules and expectations, and not lose your mind or get rid of your submissive
because they are not always followed. 




Padriag -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:33:56 PM)

Very good points Marie, I'll comment further below, but I agree that there can be some confusion here depending how how terms are used or understood.

quote:

ORIGINAL: marieToo

FR:

I think there is a line between having standards, criteria, and expectations, and having specific "rules" for a submissive that are tailor-made to be as effective as possible with that particular submissive.  

The thread title (no offense to the OP) is posed in a way which invites confusion and a blurring of the lines, because specific "rules" are not necessarily the same as "expectations".   

Example: 

Expectation or Standard:  I expect my submissive to keep the house clean. 
 
Rule:  My submissive has to accomplish all her housecleaning chores on her day off work.

The above rule might be altered if the sub has a habit of skipping out on the chores because she doesn't like to do them,  Then the rule might be changed to:  She's not allowed to go shopping or socialize with friends until the chores are done.
  
I think this is a key point.  However, we use terms a little differently here.  Where you view it as altering a rule, I view it as altering a consequence.  I'll try to illustrate by extending your example.

Supposing I set the rule that a submissive must keep the house clean.  That's a very general and broad rule, so to clarify I'd break it down into more specific expectations, such as how often the furniture should be dusted, floors mopped or swept, windows cleaned, dishes washed, etc.  This would be the "rule".

Suppose the submissive wasn't complying with this rule fully.  That would mean I'd want to alter her behavior, so I'd examine what might be causing her misbehavior and apply, to the best of my ability, a consequence that would motivate her to alter her behavior into compliance.   This is the key area where our terminology differs and where some of my previous posts might have been misunderstood.  My rule doesn't change, the rule is still to keep the house cleaned to certain specifications... what changes are the consequences, in this case something unpleasant will be applied until the behavior alters... when she begins complying, that consequence may change yet again to something pleasant as a reinforcer for the desired behavior.

Hopefully that helps clear up some miscommunication.  Thanks for bringing it up Marie.


quote:

I think everyone (doms and subs) need to have certain standards about what kind of relationship they want or expect to have.  When we are true to those standards, we tend to attract like-minded people.

Absolutely agree

quote:

After a relationship begins to develope and unfold between two like-minded people with similar standards, then the dom can see exactly where the submissive needs polishing in order to meet his specific expectations, and I think that's where the tailor-made rules have to come into play.  And every submissive is different too.  It's not like a dom should change what he wants in order to accomodate a submissive, but each relationship has a different chemistry to it, and what a dom wants from one submissive may not be the same as what he wants from the next or the last.  In structuring the rules of the relationship, there's got to be some consideration on the Dom's part with regards to the submissive's particular personality.  Absolute rigidity with no regard for the fact that you're dealing with individual human beings, most likely isn't going to get any dom very far.

Here too I think we very much agree, just a slight difference in terminology really, saying essentially the same things in different ways.  Sometimes my very precise usage of behavioral terminology unfortunately doesn't really aid in effective communication. [8|]  Blame it on the geek in me.  




MadRabbit -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:34:36 PM)

I have expectations that don't change from relationship to relationship based on my own personal desires.

I have some basic rules that are like that as well with obedience mainly the golden rule and the close second being that I decide what is success or failure.

My protocols change based on what I like and are not influenced by the person. There is some that I am really strict about and some that I am more lax about. For example, I don't have rigourous requirements for when I am to be addressed as "sir", but is rather a behavior I try to instill in response to my tone. The end result being that when I want to hear the word "sir", I use a different tone and I get the automatic response. That is the only consistency that is important to me as opposed to every single acknowledgement being a "Yes, sir!"

How important a particular behavior is to me is usually determined by how much I dislike the absence of it.

My dynamic with my girl isn't something based on rigourous black and white lines, but rather a dynamic that centers around obedience.




MzMia -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 8:46:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

I have expectations that don't change from relationship to relationship based on my own personal desires.

I have some basic rules that are like that as well with obedience mainly the golden rule and the close second being that I decide what is success or failure.

My protocols change based on what I like and are not influenced by the person. There is some that I am really strict about and some that I am more lax about. For example, I don't have rigourous requirements for when I am to be addressed as "sir", but is rather a behavior I try to instill in response to my tone. The end result being that when I want to hear the word "sir", I use a different tone and I get the automatic response. That is the only consistency that is important to me as opposed to every single acknowledgement being a "Yes, sir!"

How important a particular behavior is to me is usually determined by how much I dislike the absence of it.

My dynamic with my girl isn't something based on rigourous black and white lines, but rather a dynamic that centers around obedience.


I have had a really long day.
I need to get my eyes checked, I agree with everything the MR wrote!
I was scared to read it at first, lol.

Sure, I have set rules and expectations prior to meeting a submissive.
But, my feelings for that person will also influence how much of a stickler I am.
Sometimes, with the right person---the rules and expectations turn into a shared
life together. [:D]
As I said earlier, many of my rules, are situations and expectations that my mate
would love.
One man's prison is another man's freedom.




LadyHugs -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/2/2008 9:12:23 PM)

Dear MzMia, Ladies and Gentlemen;
 
Not really responding to anyone and or any post however, I did want to express that from my point of view having several relationships--that not one of them was the same.
 
Expectations and rules have to be in levels and the basic levels should be, in my opinion; those deal breakers where there is no compromises; e.g. no smoking, no illegal drugs, alcoholic abuse and such.  Really, for most--I would think something that has to be fixed and expectations known up front--not an after thought.
 
The rigidity of expectations and rules become less solid as compromises are negotiated and it goes to the most flexible of all that works for the people involved.  What I expect out of a seasoned slave of mine in my collar for 9 years would be different from the expectations I have for a slave of mine in a collar of mine for 9 months. 
 
As far as rules goes--it is as only good as it's commitments to the rules by both individuals.  It should be followed in the 'spirit' they were created.  Adjudication is up to the Master and good and fair judgment.  If a slave is late--it might be well justified; I won't discipline/punish for something where the rule is broken and circumstances not in favor of the slave.  However, if smoking is against the rules--these slaves know the consequences ahead of time and they made the choice and I will punish accordingly.  In summary, courts have the flexibility in enforcement of the law/rules--I feel Masters have the same flexibilities in adjudicating their law/rules and or protocols in their home/castle.
 
As children we had these rules and expectations set up by adult(s)/parent(s) and or guardian(s).  These were our 'authority figures' and rule makers.  E.g. "...While living under 'my' roof you will do this or that--those are the rules."  The reassignment of 'authority' labels from parent role to Master is not all that different.  How many times did we hear as teens--"...If you don't like my rules--leave." --So, perhaps those who do not like protocol are fresh and free from parental governmental rules of the house.  Not until there is a need to set up a new house/home do the reasoning behind rules and expectations of a household become clearer to some.
 
Just some thoughts.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
Lady Hugs




CruelErethism -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/3/2008 9:05:37 AM)

I believe that its very simply a case that each person will have their own "set of rules". Be they formally set, as a manual, or a simple list, written or spoken, detailing what is expected or not tolerated from the sub. However, I do believe that for each relationship rules develop in order guide and nuture the sub in the ways that encourages them to serve their Master / Mistress in the way that pleases the Master / Mistress.




roland23 -> RE: Masters? Do you have set rules and expectations for your submissive? (1/3/2008 10:48:07 AM)

I am old school, so I begin with attire.  A sub must wear a dress or a skirt( Casual dressy?) She must also wear make-up and wear heels, no less than 3 inches. I find that establishing ground rules for attire makes more extensive training easier. 




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.484375