Focus50 -> RE: What should I do? (1/6/2008 2:49:48 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote:
It's merely *my* opinion based on the limited information available. It's not possible I'm right? You actually know what this particular dom's motivation is? Finally, if a dom isn't making or asking his sub to troll on his/their behalf, then the sub might logically be perceived has having quite some nerve in deciding to introduce strangers to their relationship, no? And if yes, who really has control here? Whoa, nearly missed this without my trademark green.... quote:
I just wanted to point out that.... It is not nice to jump to the worst negative conclusion when you have not enough information to make any sort of judgment call on what is going on this this particular case.... And I'd like to point out that your joining the fray wreaks of deja vu - of another plodding dom to the rescue because he too suffered from premature oral ejaculation.... Much like Lordandmaster, his trigger-happy actions were apparently nothing to own up to, either. Anyway, since you have bought in.... quote:
And there is a third scenario.. the sub wants to dom a female and is bisexual, so her dominant allows her to "troll" for playmates. I have read more than one submissive that is allowed to have playmates, and their dom doesn't even interact with them... two separate relationships. So no, it is not either the dom has the sub troll, or the sub is topping from the bottom or being sneaky in some way, or over stepping her bounds... You got this scenario from the OP? Here's a line from the OP.... "I introduce them to him, as a *just* in case we find her interesting and we want to try and seduce her." I draw your attention to the word "we" (twice) - nuff said? quote:
And get this, there are several couples that have poly-relationships that have not "traded" up on their partners. There are other people that think of the third as "just a pussy" and can tell the difference between a partner that they love and a piece of ass... just something you may want to consider... Me consider? Wouldn't it be more prudent to start your own thread to introduce scenarios not in evidence here? quote:
And this is from the perspective of someone who never has any intention of "trolling" for my Daddy, but my experiences in this world tell me people will not usually "trade up" because a piece of convenient ass comes along. And I coulda swore I read a post to the effect that "trading up" is precisely what happened to the author.... Do I really hafta go search? quote:
Most men do not leave their SO for an easy piece of tail... people leave relationships because they are not happy in them. Most of us are not as shallow and one dimensional that we cannot separate sex from an emotional bond, and once we get to a certain age we tend to value different things like our history with someone, the times we share with another human being. The triumphs and challenges a relationship has overcome... and frankly, your "view" tends to negate people as being one dimensional, valuing others based upon just the genitalia.... In my experience people just don't work that way I'm one of those prudes whose never indulged in casual sex just for physical sensation etc. I can see how you might label me as "one dimensional" for it but shallow? It's fine by me if you have indulged but let's not pretend that casual sex qualifies one as enlightened, noble, pious or *deep* etc.... Julia, I've long since moved on from our previous differences. Sad that the vast majority of your post is irrelevant here and has the aroma of ulterior motive.... Focus.
|
|
|
|