FTopinMichigan
Posts: 571
Joined: 7/5/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MsStressed I got the oddest email from a man who claims he wants to be my sissy maid........the thing is.......his profile claims he is a Dominant Male. Sorry if I seem a bit perplexed. I was wondering does this happen often? Or did this poor Dom's profile somehow get hijacked? I think there are many Doms that enjoy the "other side" of things, but most aren't confident enough in themselves to admit it. My favored partner is the Dom that bottoms (although sissy maid is a bit over the top in my book...that would be a sissy maid, "playing" at being a Dom...as I see it). I enjoy a man that has the confidence to admit and enjoy both sides. A dominant man that bottoms is the sexiest, in my eyes. (Crossdressing is a hard limit for me, and I can't fathom a Dom CD, although I'm sure there are some.) I received an e-mail the other day from a man admitting to wanting to "submit," but the profile was of a Dom seeking a submissive lady. I just responded that based on the e-mail offer, his profile was VERY contrary. Several days later, I received an e-mail from the same man, with a sub name (SN only changed to replace "Dom" with "sub" in the name...same numbers, etc.), and he sent almost the same e-mail, with his offer to submit. If a person is a switch...why not admit it, and enjoy it all! (I'm sure that's another thread somewhere. <g>) I take his approach, and seperate profiles (without explanation), as a full out-and-out lie, to me, and to all the other women he's making contact with at this time. This CD Dom seems to be doing the same thing. I do feel that many hide their own interests, due to reactions from the community. A Dom that subs now and then is frowned upon by men and women alike...so he hides (or protects) that side of himself. I have no problem with him having the two profiles, but if he wants to be successful in meeting a Domme/Top, then he should be up front in his initial contact, to explain both sides of himself. Dishonesty, right from the start...is no start at all. K
|