Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Something about Sex


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Something about Sex Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Something about Sex - 1/9/2008 5:06:08 PM   
astarri


Posts: 265
Joined: 4/22/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Reality: for most women, including those who love sex, foreplay is often, if not usually, the most important part of sex; and most men don't get nearly the pleasure they're capable of experiencing, either. The perpetually turned-on and ready-to-go woman doesn’t exist anywhere in the world, and any woman who claims to be one is either psycho-biologically aberrant (clinical nymphomania, for instance) or lying in order to be seen as more sexually attractive. Sure, it’s a shop-worn truism that women care about foreplay more than men do;


I didn't read it all cause i ended up getting bored with the broad generalizations but i disagree with this papragraph especially.
Not all women like foreplay ... most do i would agree but there is a large group that would rather have internal stimulation as opposed to external. Just as some women can't orgasm from intercourse, there are some that cant orgasm by cunnilingus. Added stimulation of fingers inside helps but there is no substitute for the actual sex.
For many women (if not more) sex is a mental act and the reason that we dont want sex immediately is because it takes our mind time to get into it. If, however, i can focus on the desires i might have, believe me the perpetually wet and willing woman is not a myth .... and i must admit that i am not a nymphomaniac nor do i think it makes me more appealing as most men dont want sex as much as they think they do. Kinda like when you are really hungry and fill your plate at a buffet only to find you cant finish your plate. .... Just my opinions on this

< Message edited by astarri -- 1/9/2008 5:26:10 PM >

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Something about Sex - 1/9/2008 5:17:11 PM   
Sexynmentalinkc


Posts: 132
Joined: 4/14/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: LINQ

If you read all that you really need to find something useful to do


Dude you just flamed your own post!!

Jeff



Classic!!! A new sort of masochism!

"Here's what I have to say!! It's twue!"


"...................or not!"



- Mr. S


_____________________________

"I think all right-thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that ordinary, decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. ...I'm certainly not. And I'm sick and tired of being told that I am..."

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Something about Sex - 1/9/2008 5:47:16 PM   
NaiveTempest


Posts: 345
Joined: 11/20/2006
From: North Carolina
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

I think I read that book when I was about twelve.

Cali



AHHHHHHH! That's why it all sounded so familiar!  
I think I've read that book too, but mine had pics.......

_____________________________

"All the things I should have said that I never said/All the things we should have done that we never did/All the things I should have given, but I didn't.../Give me these moments back..."

Kate Bush, "This Woman's Work"

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 3:29:03 AM   
badSequence


Posts: 3
Joined: 12/21/2005
Status: offline
I love it when people say they disagree then go on to agree

(in reply to NaiveTempest)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 3:58:21 AM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
Hey... though there are people for whom this wouldn't apply, I think you're right in a very broad and general way.  Kudos to you for having a good grasp and I would imagine any partners you have are very grateful as well.  

Pity more men aren't as understanding.

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 5:22:42 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
What do you mean we men arent understanding?  How can a man understand a woman. Typical woman convo. Honey how come you never rub my back. Honey your rubbing my back wrong. One of millions of examples.

(in reply to TreasureKY)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 5:26:14 AM   
sambamanslilgirl


Posts: 10926
Joined: 2/5/2007
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
may i have a cliff note version, please, while i try to understand what is the question/point you're trying to make.

thank you


_____________________________

...2011 - year of the fabulous rock star life ...and i do it so well...


...announcing Mr. & Mrs. British Petrol ...yeah, marrying into oil is slick business...

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 5:42:08 AM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
Dnomyar.... understanding isn't the same thing as mind reading.

It isn't all that difficult to have knowledge about about what another might like and enjoy. Subs do it all the time... many are even expected to anticipate needs and desires of their dominant.

The trick is listening, observing, and being open and emphathetic enough to have a decent level of accuracy. Of course, that is all part of good communication.

Edited to add: I forgot to say that an important key is acceptance. If a woman tells you or otherwise lets you know that she needs more than one minute of foreplay... whether you like it or not, accept it. You aren't going to change her, you aren't going to talk or shame her out of it. If you care about her enjoyment, apply that newfound knowledge to the best of your ability.

Oh, and the same thing applies to women as well as men.

< Message edited by TreasureKY -- 1/10/2008 6:11:29 AM >

(in reply to sambamanslilgirl)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 5:55:49 AM   
LINQ


Posts: 15
Joined: 12/6/2007
Status: offline
TreasureKY is obviously the smartest person to comment so far. 

(in reply to TreasureKY)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 6:16:28 AM   
Oumae


Posts: 911
Joined: 1/4/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LINQ

TreasureKY is obviously the smartest person to comment so far. 


Even smarter than you ???  You just liked comment about your partners having no complaints.

Some interesting points and while your comment...
quote:

If you read all that you really need to find something useful to do

Made me laugh not everyone gets Irish humour.

Oumae

_____________________________

Is cuma le fear na mbrog ca leagann se a chos.
( The man with the boots does not mind where he places his foot)

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 8:54:02 AM   
lateralist1


Posts: 886
Joined: 11/22/2006
Status: offline
Some very useful points and some very bad generalisations.
Take two people who want to enjoy their sexuality and want their partner to enjoy their's too.
And a lot of good communication. Physical as well as verbal and they will work it out.
But put the one in charge who knows most and who is the most complicated and they will work it out faster.
Women are in general better at relationships because they need them more.
Now that may be a bad generalisation.
It's just what I think.

(in reply to Oumae)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 2:44:36 PM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LINQ

TreasureKY is obviously the smartest person to comment so far. 


lol... *curtsies*

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 4:19:42 PM   
tigerstyle


Posts: 168
Joined: 5/25/2005
Status: offline
Everything I do is foreplay. Seriously, I'm actually into no-foreplay sex, wham bang boom....but since my very existence is foreplay, I'm often left frustrated here.




(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 5:13:49 PM   
SirJohnMandevill


Posts: 546
Joined: 11/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lateralist1

Some very useful points and some very bad generalisations.
Take two people who want to enjoy their sexuality and want their partner to enjoy their's too.
And a lot of good communication. Physical as well as verbal and they will work it out.
But put the one in charge who knows most and who is the most complicated and they will work it out faster.
Women are in general better at relationships because they need them more.
Now that may be a bad generalisation.
It's just what I think.



I was with you until that last generalization. But I agree with the rest: two people who want sex are going to gravitate toward partners who fulfill their needs and, as you said, "work it out."

Les (Purveyor of Fine, Handcrafted Kink)



_____________________________

Iam an eroticist
I am a fully eroticized being
No more neuroses
I found my strip naked soul soup
With the deviant ingredient
---The B-52s

(in reply to lateralist1)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Something about Sex - 1/10/2008 6:01:32 PM   
Griswold


Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LINQ

Myth: ALL men, and any truly sexual woman loves intercourse more than anything, is always ready to go, and wants to get right down to it as soon, and often, as possible. This belief infests the fantasy life of erotic culture--read the vast majority of erotic fiction and you’ll see evidence of this, often in the form of “...she was dripping wet instantly...” and other such lies. The truth is that it takes time for a woman’s body to become fully aroused and there’s no shortcut around simple biology. Fiction tends to de-emphasize the arousal phase of sex both to appeal to a primarily male audience (the same reason you see so much attention to physical descriptions, right down to a list of measurements, for the females in such stories) and to meet the conventions of the genre. Tales which are likely to be read as fantasy fodder for private masturbation tend to cut right to the chase because they’re all about the orgasm--not the characters’, the reader’s. Their primary purpose, when you think about it, is to help you cum faster when you’re alone, not better and more often when you’re with a partner.

The stereotype of the submissive cock-hungry bisexual nympho living in those stories is a tissue-thin (if you’ll pardon the double entendre) fantasy, meant to arouse your mind as a shortcut to orgasm. Mind you, I’m not criticizing the stories; I’m a fan of them. When it’s done well, female readers get to fantasize about a world of sexual promiscuity and adventure without social consequences and men get to immerse themselves in a world where every woman, no matter how off-limits in the real world, is an eagerly available sex partner. But what’s hot on the page, the detailed depiction of fantasy sex that really get your mental gears turning and the blood flowing isn’t necessarily what would make the best sexual encounter in real life. After all, if real sex were like the stories, men would also be expected to get it up five times in an hour. Since that’s also a biological impossibility, perhaps we should try to keep the difference between fantasy and reality in mind when thinking about our partners.

Reality: for most women, including those who love sex, foreplay is often, if not usually, the most important part of sex; and most men don't get nearly the pleasure they're capable of experiencing, either. The perpetually turned-on and ready-to-go woman doesn’t exist anywhere in the world, and any woman who claims to be one is either psycho-biologically aberrant (clinical nymphomania, for instance) or lying in order to be seen as more sexually attractive. Sure, it’s a shop-worn truism that women care about foreplay more than men do; we’ve all heard it before, and probably made a sexist joke or two about “getting to the good part” and complained to our friends or muttered under our breath after experiencing the “Wham-Bam-Thank You, Ma’am” style of sexual encounter. That doesn’t mean that men are bad in bed, don’t care about pleasuring women, or even that men are easier to please sexually than are women. In fact, most men aren’t getting one tenth of the pleasure from sex that they could, but few know it.

Because we treat the penis-centred experience of male ejaculation as the ultimate in physical pleasure and the only indicator of successfully completed sexual union, not only is female orgasm relegated to a position of minimized importance, but men aren’t encouraged to explore their bodily responses and experience the expanded possibilities for pleasure opened up by extended arousal. Very rarely do we discuss why women want and need more foreplay, much less why men might want it too--and almost never do we give men good incentive for, or good advice about, spending more of their time and erotic energies on foreplay. Nor do we, as a culture, teach men how to spend more time on arousal without getting physically over stimulated and thus risking the ego-shattering experience of turning into the one-minute man when intercourse actually happens.

Foreplay & gender: a few additional thoughts to consider: Men--when your partner is fully aroused, she’s more likely to be open to new things, more eager to bring you pleasure, and to leave with a positive impression of the sexual encounter--regardless of what happens during actual intercourse. Also, a highly stimulated and aroused woman feels better during sex--beyond the obvious question of vaginal lubrication, extended arousal phase causes all the tissues of the vaginal wall to swell, making her both softer in texture and tighter around you. Now, what’s not to like about that?

And, while oral sex is great fun for all concerned, it’s not only not the end-all and be-all of foreplay, the “I do you, now you do me, then we fuck” approach can lead to some seriously unfulfilling lovemaking. Foreplay can be fun and stimulating for both parties, without resulting in premature ejaculation and a disappointingly short romp in the sack, a sore jaw, or a mounting sense of futility--you know, that “what’s the point of this” feeling.

Women--if you don’t really know, or can’t bring yourself to tell your partner, what gets you really hot for him, it’s not fair to put all the blame on him if the sex isn’t great. Learning to be a good lover takes time, patience, and practice--and even if your partner is interested in improving his skills, there are limits to what can be generalized. Every woman’s body and mind is unique unto her, and if you expect your partner to learn what you like by trial-and-error then know that it’s likely to take a long time, or cause him to give up out of frustration. And if you want to steer his efforts, do it gently and positively, okay? Nobody likes to be criticized, particularly while they’re naked. Be sensitive to his feelings in this because whether he admits it or not, a fair amount of his self-esteem is wrapped up in his desirability and performance as a lover.

Also, foreplay isn’t a one-way street. While there are some obvious visual triggers and “hot spots” that can get a man ready for sex quickly, paying attention to a man’s whole body will still feel very good for him, and will slow down the arousal process a bit and help prevent that hair-trigger phenomenon that everybody hates. And if you would like to get extended and more diverse attention paid to your body, giving it to him first is a good non-verbal way of trying to express your desires and teach him to fulfil them. Plus, contrary to conventional wisdom, slowing down the male arousal phase actually leads to longer and more intense ejaculations and even the all-too-rare phenomenon of the multiply orgasmic man.


GAWWWWD that was long.

I actually don't give a fuck.

Had you been able to present your thoughts in either.....

a)  Something that approximated a reasonable length post (i.e., something that didn't make my eyes well up reading it)....

OR....

b)  Something with societally acceptable paragraph breaks....

I'd probably have answered your no doubt heartfelt question and concerns...

(But you didn't).

Ciao.

(Someone who might have given a fuck....)

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Something about Sex - 1/11/2008 3:57:31 AM   
LINQ


Posts: 15
Joined: 12/6/2007
Status: offline
I am beginning to wonder if some people here might benefit from reading classes

(in reply to Griswold)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Something about Sex - 1/11/2008 4:00:31 AM   
LINQ


Posts: 15
Joined: 12/6/2007
Status: offline
TreasureKY is still winning

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Something about Sex - 1/11/2008 8:58:00 AM   
velvetears


Posts: 2933
Joined: 6/19/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LINQ

#1 The truth is that it takes time for a woman’s body to become fully aroused and there’s no shortcut around simple biology.

#2 Fiction tends to de-emphasize the arousal phase of sex both to appeal to a primarily male audience (the same reason you see so much attention to physical descriptions, right down to a list of measurements, for the females in such stories) and to meet the conventions of the genre.

#3 ...perhaps we should try to keep the difference between fantasy and reality in mind when thinking about our partners. 

#4 for most women, including those who love sex, foreplay is often, if not usually, the most important part of sex; and most men don't get nearly the pleasure they're capable of experiencing, either.

#5 Foreplay & gender: a few additional thoughts to consider: Men--when your partner is fully aroused, she’s more likely to be open to new things, more eager to bring you pleasure, and to leave with a positive impression of the sexual encounter--regardless of what happens during actual intercourse. Also, a highly stimulated and aroused woman feels better during sex--beyond the obvious question of vaginal lubrication, extended arousal phase causes all the tissues of the vaginal wall to swell, making her both softer in texture and tighter around you. Now, what’s not to like about that?

#6 Women--if you don’t really know, or can’t bring yourself to tell your partner, what gets you really hot for him, it’s not fair to put all the blame on him if the sex isn’t great. Learning to be a good lover takes time, patience, and practice--and even if your partner is interested in improving his skills, there are limits to what can be generalized. Every woman’s body and mind is unique unto her, and if you expect your partner to learn what you like by trial-and-error then know that it’s likely to take a long time, or cause him to give up out of frustration. And if you want to steer his efforts, do it gently and positively, okay? Nobody likes to be criticized, particularly while they’re naked. Be sensitive to his feelings in this because whether he admits it or not, a fair amount of his self-esteem is wrapped up in his desirability and performance as a lover.



#7 Also, foreplay isn’t a one-way street.


#1 False.... not every women has the same biology and some women can respond very rapidly and become aroused within minutes.... i know as i am one of them.  It all depends on mood, chemistry etc. 

#2 The reason you see so much attention to physical description is because most fiction is geared to males and they are more visually oriented then females.

#3 "Should try"????  If you have to make an effort to seperate fiction from fantasy you have problems. 

#4 HUGE generalization here. How can you speak for the majority what is the most important part of sex - show me the studies and statistics which say so. 

#5 i don't have to be fully aroused to be open to new things - don't speak for everyone, what a silly notion.  The more aroused a woman is the better she will feel during sex and the tighter she will be????  Again, a huge generalization and one which i do not agree with across the board.  What's not to like about that? - that depends on personal preferance.  i am sure many men, especially dom, will find the different phases a woman go trough to be arousing for all sorts of various reasons.

#6 Sex 101.... and by the way trial and error can be fun

#7 Well duh!


_____________________________

Religion is for people who are scared of hell, Spirituality is for people who have been there

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Something about Sex - 1/11/2008 9:04:15 AM   
lateralist1


Posts: 886
Joined: 11/22/2006
Status: offline
Ok John lets change the last bit to
I never enjoy sex unless I'm in control.
Is that better?
It doesn't matter what my lover does if I'm not in the mood I am not in the mood. And if he continues to press me it could change how I feel about him permanently.
Whereas if I am the right woman for him I can get him in the mood easily. If I'm not the right woman then what is he doing with me?
One of the problems I have found is that I have been a party to dragging relationships out sometimes well past their sell by date.
Because of all the obvious reasons and some not so obvious.
If it's a friendship type relationship then it's much better to be upfront about it. Communication is the key right from the beginning.
If you manage to get on as friends sometimes things change.

(in reply to SirJohnMandevill)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Something about Sex - 1/11/2008 10:22:15 AM   
meticulousgirl


Posts: 969
Joined: 2/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LINQ

If you read all that you really need to find something useful to do


LOL dude you just flamed your own post!!!!!!!!

(in reply to LINQ)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Something about Sex Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141