Boondoggle -> RE: Is it a crime to be a switch? (1/14/2008 11:17:41 PM)
|
At a play party last night (in a community where switching is actually not uncommon), I was watching a woman who identifies primarily as a sub scratching, punching and biting the fuck out of a guy (whom I've not seen play before). I quietly commented to a friend (who identifies only as dominant, and takes himself none-to-seriously, and graciously offers his well-equipped basement dungeon for parties) that I never realized she 'was such an evil bitch.' (A comment which we both understood not to be derogatory in the least, more like a compliment of sorts.) He agreed and replied to me that 'switchy subs are the meanest sons-of-bitches' (he's a southerner, in the frozen hinterlands). This struck me a bit I realized I've been called mean and evil on the rare occasions I top, and I identify as something of a 'switchy sub.' I certainly can't be the dominant in a relationship (I've tried, we were both subs, it didn't work), and I don't want to. However, that doesn't mean I don't enjoy inflicting a little evilness on occasion. I think the point(s) I'm getting at is that, first of all, lots of bullshit goes on online, while, in the in-the-flesh community, people tend to be more open and accepting. The second is that I've encountered a few select profiles that awaken those dominant urges of mine, and I suspect a message coming from a profile of a submissive seeking an intimate, female-led relationship would be treated quite differently than one from a dominant interested in primarily a friendship, but with the distinct possibility of some evilness. PS. Lashra, I've loved the quote in your signature since the first time I saw it. I view the 'Church' as responsible for eons of oppression.
|
|
|
|