RE: Human first.

RE: Human first. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Tigrita -> RE: Human first. (1/11/2008 12:12:44 PM)
99% of the people I meet I don't feel submissive towards whatsoever, and I have no desire to just act it out; the actions aren't what are fulfilling to my craving for a D/s interaction. Does not feeling submissive to 99% of the population mean I'm not cut out to enjoy that? Absolutely not. Because the small percentage of people who do have me captivated, have me on my toes and eager to please, just by their very nature and mine and the chemistry we have, give me a feeling more satisfying and fulfilling than any other type of interaction I experience as far as sexual relationships. For me, submissive is an adjective, not a noun, or an identity. I am submissive only to those with whom I have that chemistry, and it flows very naturally and not through commands and titles; it starts with pure and simple chemistry that is instantly recognizable even in the most mundane conversations or activities, or sometimes even from watching from across the room. It can apply to a coleague, a mentor, a friend, not just a BDSM prospective partner, it is just a natural human dynamic that I feel with a rare few people, whether they call themselves 'doms' or not.

Amaros -> RE: Human first. (1/11/2008 2:34:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: christine1 i agree with this statement, but i'm currently purplexed about the physics of pissing up a rope if you're a woman...i'm just wondering lol, and the visuals are quite entertaining. Go climb a rope and we'll find out... Sorry, this just reminded me of high school gym class, when you'd have to climb those big thick ropes - invariably, some girl would get half way up and freeze, then slide down all flushed, her face red as a beet and weak in the knees, lol. I wonder if they still do that? It was always high point of gym class for me. I'm all about the human thing, I guess I see dominance largely in physiological terms - it's also psychological of course, but there's a line there somewhere - identity perhaps, personality maybe - every person has some unique and personal facet that cannot be dominated or owned agianst your will - the "self" maybe, and it the fact that someone is willing to surrender this to you willingly that makes submission distinct from the results of mere brute physical/psychological coercion, and elevates it to the equisitely wrought (or not) social interaction that is D/s.

Leatherist -> RE: Human first. (1/11/2008 2:42:41 PM)
Yes. This is why labels are poison to me.

adoracat -> RE: Human first. (1/11/2008 3:50:58 PM)
the first time Daddy and i were together.... we laid on the bed, and snuggled, and he did VERY silly imitations of the swedish chef from the muppet show. he is no less dominant for that, and it made me adore him even more because he's secure enough in who he is to be silly. about 10 minutes later, he had me over his knee and i was begging to cum while he spanked me. we're human first. he and i both have physical problems, sometimes things dont work right, and we go on. i'm no less his slave, he's no less my Master. kitten

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.015625