War on terror??

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

War on terror??

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> War on terror??

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 8:30:00 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

bank across from FBi robbed! LMAO! so much on a "secure" nation! http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=28684

Profile

Post #: 1

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 9:12:03 AM

Sanity

Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Damn that George Bush! Everything is his fault - even Global Warming!!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

bank across from FBi robbed! LMAO! so much on a "secure" nation! http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=28684

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 2

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 11:40:38 AM

pahunkboy

Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

Not all of it is on George. Prescott started the BS. Making money off of the holacaust. War profiteering. Tho no bid contracts are on geo- as is a costly boondogle in Iraq- where disproportionately the cost will born to babies. geo also has the imperial nerve to void out contracts between same sex couples. He says all knowldge doesnt exist with in Washington DC- and if for states rights- yet- Calif cant have medical marriwanna nor can it impose higher fuel standards..even tho those same staandards are law in China. [a market of 1.3 billion consumers]

Not all of us drive three bedroom SUVs....

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 3

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 11:55:13 AM

charmdpetKeira

Posts: 916
Joined: 6/2/2007
Status: offline

I'm alomst disapointed; I was sure they were going to say the weapon of choice was a box cutter. Damn!

k

_____________________________

Life is tough, that does not mean it isn't fair.

There is no wrong choice, only consequence.

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 4

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 9:58:02 PM

FangsNfeet

Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline

I'm supprised that banks trust people just for walking in wearing a uniform. This is case of having a poor Procedure Protocol. I always thought that Security Van dirvers had to have Paper Work and or Pass Words to prove there legitimacy and what they where there to pick up.

This is the fault of the bank. The FBI can't be blaimed for the banks over trusting idiot employees. Should a gun fight or hostage situation occure, then yeah, I think the FBI would have kept the guy from getting away.

Banks are just going to have to bump up it's security policy. If Brinks is sending a driver, then the bank should know in advance the drivers name, badge number, and order route number for the pick up. The security truck should be visable and confirmation on the lisence plate number also needs to be varified with the company over the phone.

When a bank calls in for a pick up, they should recieve a fax of the Truck and Driver that will be comming over. The driver will need to have paper work that matches the confirmation fax return. A bank security guard or staff member can then escort the driver back to the truck where the vehicle license and tag number can also be verified prior to loading the valuables.

If the bank just wants to give money away, that's its problem. Let's not make fun of the FBI. They're doing there job.

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan

(in reply to pahunkboy)

Profile

Post #: 5

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 10:07:01 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

Damn that George Bush! Everything is his fault - even Global Warming!!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

bank across from FBi robbed! LMAO! so much on a "secure" nation! http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=28684

Nope,not quite.

Rich,,stupid ,greedy ,white men, are to blame for climate change.

Bush just happens to be their leader,right now,so he gets the flack,and should.

Why is Bush suing three western states,who want to control pollution and increase efficiency?Should we blame someone else for that?lol

(in reply to Sanity)

Profile

Post #: 6

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 10:13:04 PM

slaveboyforyou

Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline

quote:

Rich,,stupid ,greedy ,white men, are to blame for climate change.

Yeah, it's all the rich, white man's fault. After all; they are the only ones that drive cars, heat and cool their homes, eat meat, use electricity, use aerosols.....I could keep going.

(in reply to Owner59)

Profile

Post #: 7

RE: War on terror?? - 1/13/2008 11:26:38 PM

Owner59

Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

quote:

Rich,,stupid ,greedy ,white men, are to blame for climate change.

Yeah, it's all the rich, white man's fault. After all; they are the only ones that drive cars, heat and cool their homes, eat meat, use electricity, use aerosols.....I could keep going.

Nope,we`re all doing that.

It`s the rich,,stupid ,greedy ,white men, who are keeping us from making any progress on any of these problems,ie. energy independence,solar/wind/water power,solar banks and super efficiency, lower polluting technologys and cleaning up coal power.

We would all do a lot better,except for the Enrons,Exxons,and Haliburtons of the world,who only want to soak us for as much as they can get.They don`t care about climate change(we do),they don`t care about pollution or alternative power sources,like we do.They just care about money,and nothing else.

Why anyone would defend these people, while they`re fucking us in the ass,is beyond my understanding.Perhaps it`s just one more definition of masochist.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 1/13/2008 11:31:16 PM >

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)

Profile

Post #: 8