Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Monogamy


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Monogamy Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 5:16:46 PM   
clwangkai


Posts: 14
Joined: 9/22/2007
Status: offline 		but even then she missed the true meaning of your post...at least in my mind

(in reply to bamabbwsub)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 5:18:17 PM   
sambamanslilgirl


Posts: 10926
Joined: 2/5/2007
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline 		she stated and i quote  "My point in posting this is that if your relationship changes in the future, or if you consider adding a third Dom to your life" - and i rightly so replied correctly. the only way my relationships would change with my two is if one of them or me dies. end of subject on that ...not this topic.

also to address your "and you call me close minded? you just epitomized the definition of being narrow minded...and yes if they are cool with that then so be it...i guess the saying "ignorance is bliss" is true" - frankly i don't have to consider any options you offer.  i do have and reserve to the right to refuse when your opinion doesn't really count and/or matter ...especially since you're trying to force your ideologies and beliefs on me.


_____________________________

...2011 - year of the fabulous rock star life ...and i do it so well...


...announcing Mr. & Mrs. British Petrol ...yeah, marrying into oil is slick business...

(in reply to clwangkai)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 5:19:53 PM   
clwangkai


Posts: 14
Joined: 9/22/2007
Status: offline 		i don't think that i have at all...i have said that if you want to believe that then so be it...why are you so defensive?  What is your fear? Why fight so hard about this?  Why the attitude of you against the world?

(in reply to sambamanslilgirl)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 5:28:48 PM   
camille65


Posts: 5746
Joined: 7/11/2007
From: Austin Texas
Status: offline 		They are monogamous to you, but you aren't to just one of them.

_____________________________


~Love your life! (It is the only one you'll get).




(in reply to sambamanslilgirl)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 5:36:04 PM   
sambamanslilgirl


Posts: 10926
Joined: 2/5/2007
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: clwangkai

i don't think that i have at all...i have said that if you want to believe that then so be it...why are you so defensive?  What is your fear? Why fight so hard about this?  Why the attitude of you against the world?

because i can be - is that a sin?

if so, i would suggest beating me with wet noodles however you need permission from my dominants first.  don't expect an approval either.


_____________________________

...2011 - year of the fabulous rock star life ...and i do it so well...


...announcing Mr. & Mrs. British Petrol ...yeah, marrying into oil is slick business...

(in reply to clwangkai)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 5:37:49 PM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline 		What everyone is attempting to say is that you cannot change the definition of a word simply by wishing it were so.
If I went to a doctor and he said I am morbidly obese (I'm not, this is just an example), and I came home to my hubby who happens to LOVE extra pounds on women (also, just a made up example), and he told me I was perfect just the way I am, that would not change the fact that I am, in fact, morbidly obese, and that I will have health issues because of it, and other people may look at me in a different way.
You may, in your own circle call yourself whatever you like of course, but when having an intelligent discussion in English, than English must be observed.
I also, always enjoy your posts. I just have to chime in that I disagree with you in this one case.

~Christina

(in reply to camille65)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 6:02:59 PM   
littlebitxxx


Posts: 732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: clwangkai

Is it really possible for a person to have two sexual partners but only serving one to be considered in a monogamous relationship?  If so, how?  Them being with multiple partners makes the relationship poly does it not?  Would love to hear some feedback


I'm thinking too many people put too much stock in labels and definitions.  Who really cares what it's called if the people in it are happy doing it.  And to outsiders, you'd probably have to explain exactly what you mean anyway even if you used the 'proper' word.   IMO

_____________________________

There is no such thing as can't unless it is followed by yet

It is the meaningless little acts that become meaningful in the doing.

The people that mind don't matter and the people that matter don't mind.

(in reply to clwangkai)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 6:11:31 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline 		So if you have multiple personalities, and multiple monogamous relationships (god that hurt just to type it), does that mean you're busier than the average literate person?

Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to littlebitxxx)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Monogamy - 1/13/2008 7:05:42 PM   
princessleather


Posts: 20
Joined: 12/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: agoodgirl4Daddy

oh....FFS!!

if it's a DUCK..call it a duck. 

having 2 Dominants does not equal MONOGAMY....

the person having 2 Dominants is POLYAMOROUS...the Dominants may be Mongamous...but the person with 2 "partners/Dominants/Daddies/etcetcetc" is HARDLY MONOGAMOUS!!! 

this is just silly!! 

and..hey..if it makes people happy and helps them justify their choices ...by all means call a DUCK a cow..a pig...a platypus..whatever....


Some people are just delusional ... ..



(in reply to agoodgirl4Daddy)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Monogamy - 1/14/2008 3:21:07 AM   
DrDoo


Posts: 9
Joined: 12/10/2005
Status: offline 		i'm flabbergasted to hear that standard dictionary definitions don't apply in the bdsm world!!

_____________________________

the greatest thing you'll ever learn is to love and be loved in return

(in reply to princessleather)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Monogamy - 1/14/2008 5:50:56 AM   
PanthersMom


Posts: 2215
Joined: 11/26/2007
From: Cleveland Ohio
Status: offline 		unless someone changed the definition, monogamy means one partner, period. 

PM 

_____________________________

That which does not kill me, better run pretty damn fast

I miss my ex, but my aim is improving!




(in reply to clwangkai)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Monogamy - 1/14/2008 6:24:54 AM   
breatheasone


Posts: 4004
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline 		That depends on what the meaning of the word is, is........LMAO.........
Sorry...I just couldn't resist.


< Message edited by breatheasone -- 1/14/2008 6:25:28 AM >

_____________________________

Romans 10:13,For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mike posts in black font
candy posts in pink font

(in reply to PanthersMom)
Profile   Post #: 52
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Monogamy Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078