RE: The Middle East Solution? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/15/2008 11:33:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

You'll find the root of the problem is the dispossessing of Palestinian land and homes by the Israeli government - funded and armed by the Americans.


No. That, arguably, is the cause of the Palestinians hatred.. The root of the problem (i.e. lack of peace) is that the Palestinians hatred of Israel has become so mindless that they are teaching their children to blow themselves up. With such intractable hatred, a peaceful solution is impossible. As the man said, you can’t reason with unreasonable people.


Palestinian hatred huh? I wonder where they got it from. How about a quote or two from Ben Gurion...

We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population.

“We must expel the Arabs and take their places.”

"Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves ... politically we are the aggressors and they defend themselves... The country is theirs, because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country."
 
Or a quote or two from Golda Meir
 
"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist."
 
"This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its legitimacy."

 
Rabin

"We walked outside, Ben-Gurion accompanying us. Allon repeated his question, What is to be done with the Palestinian population?' Ben-Gurion waved his hand in a gesture which said 'Drive them out!"

Begin

"[The Palestinians] are beasts walking on two legs."
 
"The Partition of Palestine is illegal. It will never be recognized .... Jerusalem was and will for ever be our capital. Eretz Israel will be restored to the people of Israel. All of it. And for Ever."
 
Shamir
 
"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed against the boulders and walls."

Netanyahu

"Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions among the Arabs of the territories."
 
Barak
 
"The Palestinians are like crocodiles, the more you give them meat, they want more"....

"If we thought that instead of 200 Palestinian fatalities, 2,000 dead would put an end to the fighting at a stroke, we would use much more force...."

Sharon
"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonialization, or Jewish State without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands."

"Everybody has to move, run and grab as many (Palestinian) hilltops as they can to enlarge the (Jewish) settlements because everything we take now will stay ours...Everything we don't grab will go to them."
 
"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of Israel on trial."

Though I doubt facing the truth will change your opinion. The media in America has been biased for so long and rightwing Americans have never been interested in the truth as it is too inconvenient to their view of the world.




Termyn8or -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 12:12:44 AM)

So sucide bombers are crazy ? The "cowards" who go blow themselves up to take out as many as the enemy as they can ? After our pushbutton heroes kill their families ? Have you been on Mars or what ?

That is a last ditch effort, it is done for all practical purposes because they have lost. They have lost because of US support for their enemies. Yes I am surprised it does not happen here more.

And in case you did not know, car bombs were invented in the US. Suicide bombing is a bit different, because they know if they ever get caught they would rather be dead. So they just stay in the car. Note that McVeigh did not. Note that he is dead anyway.

So why shouldn't they just stay in the car or truck ? Their lives are destroyed, family members dead, if someone did to me what was done to them I would drive the biggest car bomb to the most populated place I could, if the populous were my enemies. Wouldn't you ?

While I do not condone what they do, I do understand.

And, last but not least, where the hell is Mod11 ? That "raghead" term is clearly against TOS, unless I am reading something wrong here. Maybe she's busy, expect a mail though, unless I am the only one here who needs to follow the rules. I can't use any racial slurs against those "raghead's" sworn enemies, so it is patently unfair to allow you to do the same to them. Fair is fair, and she might be getting a mail from me soon.

I wonder now if it would be allowed to use the term "imperialist pig" to describe certain Americans. And if I gotta follow the rules, dammit everybody else had better have to as well. Raghead is the same thing as towelhead, and it is a sign of cowardess to deal from a position of authority. You assume the authority of the governmentd of the US and Israel ?

Imperialist. I'll just leave out the pig part. The Russians called us decadent, and the root of that word is not decade, it is decay. And they were right.

The chant goes on, "kill them T-Heads, turn it into a big glass parking lot" but anyone with a half a brain can see we can't do that without getting rid of our "closest ally" in the region.

Personally I am all for letting them all take care of their own problems.

And, to the guy with the new term "raghead" let me tell you something. You have just exposed yourself as an anti-Semite. Most Arabs are Semite, just different tribes. They may have had their own different diasporas, but they are more closely related to each other than anyone else. Each side of the Semitic equation has their full measure of will, ire, patriotism, loyatly to home and hearth, ambition as well as hubris. They fight over territory, we have a stable territory, we do not live that life and do not understand it.

We have never had what they had. Since 1959 we have had the same territory, and I might add that no foreign power has even thought about attacking even our most remote areas with the purpose of claiming them.

Add to that the fact that we are the only ones to ever actually use a nuclear weapon in a war. What do those two facts add up to ? We are the bogeyman. We are the bully. Those who think they know history need to do some studying, those who do know history, well, already mostly agree with me. Not all the time, but quite a bit. We are in the wrong here, of that there is no question. Those people are not crazy, they are exacting revenge. I would do the same, on either side.

But revenge only begets more revenge. The cycle has to stop. The bombings and the oppression must stop at pretty much the same time. And people start that, when possible. When big money has a stranglehold on the government of a country this can be difficult.

None of them can see the light. I don't mean religion, that is all but gone. I mean what would happen if one Israeli soldier, instead of mowing a Palestinian kid down the with the old Kalishnikov, just said "Git home". What if some Palestinian teenager has a Jew down on the ground and is about to smash his face in with a rock, but instead says "I can't do it, let me help you up".

Wars cannot be fought without people. As such the only logical conclusions are that people can be the ones to stop wars, and unfortunately the cost will be great.

I mean let them go into Iran and get the draft back up. I would hope nobody showed up at all. Like John Lennon said "What if they gave a war and nobody came". Unfortunately this leaves our guys who are already there in a bit of a pickle. Did I mention that this would not be easy ? May have somewhere down the line. Like having Ron Paul for a President, we cannot handle, at least most of us would not be able to handle such a drastic change. How many people work in the defense industry ? Those are damnear the only good jobs left in this country. What happens when two thirds of them are gone overnight ?

You think I am kidding ? Take a look around. I might be ready for it, but most hardly anybody else is. I do not have health care, I do niot want it, I do not pay them, I do not collect from them. If I am broke I will do something to not starve, I want nothing from them, and I have maneuvered myself into a situation where they get nothing from me. And that's the way I want it, I will never get any retirement of any kind, nor anything else.

I would be just fine with Ron Paul. Send them soldiers down to Texas so the ranchers can get back to making food for our people, instead of running things like Ranch Rescue.

It has been said that we are better at securing borders across the world than the ones right here. And that is true.

It is time to stop. This is madness, or is that MADness now ?

Hardly anyone is ready for the change back to living within the law, our own means, and the precepts of common decency (cite : Gitmo).

I think it is probably going to get worse for another twenty years before shit happens really, I'll be 67. I have no kids. Have fun with your worlds folks, I tried to tell you.

It is said that people who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. But you have to learn real history. You have to know things, find out things that were not included in your schoolbooks. If you have learned from fake or incomplete history, well, oh well.

It is not our freedom and democracy we have that they hate, it is our bombs. I remember a passage from a movie called Black rain.

"I remember when they dropped those bombs on us, it was not right. The rain was black (innacurate but close), and I will not be satisfied until every American child is hooked on heroin"

The story was about an international drug dealer, who held it as a labor of love. As a patriotic act.

You won't see movies like this anymore. And I must admit, that after the dropping of the first bomb, the second was totally unnecessary. And that is a fact.

And we were guilty, and reconstructed their country better than it had ever been, at least for our purposes. They have practically no natural resources there as far as fueling industry. They import almost everything, but they have a large labor pool.

Thus, many companies popped up.

Mitsubishi started making electronics and later, cars, but they were already big enough to have built the Zero bombers.

Tokyo Tse Chung Kogyo became Sony.

Tokyo Shibaru became Toshiba

Hitachi Denshi became Hitachi

Thenish, JVC was formed, which stands for Japan Victor Corporation. Remember that the inventors of COLOR TV worked for a statesdie company known as RCA Victor. They were closeley realted in the beginning, but no more.

And that is only one subject, televisions, something that we invented. Yes Baird invented it in England at almost the same time as Farnsworth here, but why were they now building it ? Back then we were as well, but the idea was, we thought we were so smart that "They can build these but they can't build those", again and again it has been our downfall to underestimate others.

In the case of suicide bombers, I imagine we underestimated the Arabs' love for their family and community. In the case of pushbutton heros, we have underestimated the US governments ability to brainwash people.

It is drummed into our heads all our lives that we are the greatest and smartest in the world, while nothing could be farther from the truth, well there are a few countries worse. But not many. As such we have the right to rule the world and tell people where and under what kind of government to live. We have an illusion of greatness, but the real greatness is long gone, and for that I am not happy. But I did not do it.

At age ten my work ethic was better than that of our "leaders".

This all disgusts me, I am ashamed and embarrassed by the actions of this government. Gitmo is not the half of it.The syphillis experiments, Bikini Atoll and the SUBSEQUENT exposure of US soldiers to radiation in New Mexico. The laws they write now, HR4230 comes to mind. No basis in the Constitution and wants to police the whole world. Who the fuck do we think we are ?

Enough for now, really enough. I'll be back.

T




Level -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 2:44:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

Merc, are you serious? I’d think this was an April Fools day joke if it wasn’t the middle of January. You’re pulling my leg, right?


*pictures Merc spending a childhood filled with joyously poking anthills, to watch the reaction* [:D]




Marc2b -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 8:36:48 AM)

quote:

So sucide bombers are crazy ? The "cowards" who go blow themselves up... etc, etc, etc...

I am curious as to why this rambling rant was directed at me. I never used the term raghead. Nor did I call suicide bombers cowards. They’re to stupid to be cowards (yeah!!!! I’m gonna get me seventy - two virgins!!!!). The cowards are the one who incite them.




kdsub -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 8:37:34 AM)

I think coward can be used to describe a suicide bomber. Although a difference in cultures does weigh in this discussion.

Many people think suicide is a cowardly escape from facing problems in life…be they physical or mental. In this case it could be a fear to face others in battle or just a way to kill oneself with out the stigma of suicide. 

It is like standing with your back to a cliff... an overwhelming force approaching… you have a knife. Your choices… jump off the cliff…as the Japanese did on Iwo... grab the first person to approach you and jump taking him with you as the suicide bombers do or… as a brave man or woman would do, kill as many of the enemy as you can face to face like a man not a coward that kills themselves.

Taking ones life under most circumstances is a cowardly act when compared to brave men and women fighting disease, or an enemy.

I do however think the true cowards are the leaders and recruiters who offer rewards for others to kill themselves. They find weak people unable to face life and offer them a way to kill themselves without the sigma that often goes with suicide. They convince them that God will not only forgive them but also reward them in heaven and their families on earth. It is despicable to take advantage of those afraid of life…cowards.

I just wanted to add I do understand cowardice and may even embrace it myself someday. I contemplated it once when faced with a terrible fatal disease ALS. This disease is invariably fatal...slow and expensive. It would have taken all my savings and dignity.  I thought it would be better to take my life then put my family through the pain. My daughters however did not agree… they wanted me as long as possible… I loved them so and could never hurt them.

Butch




meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 9:28:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I think coward can be used to describe a suicide bomber. Although a difference in cultures does weigh in this discussion.



You're talking nonsense. You can describe suicide bombers as many things but cowards is not one of them.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 9:57:45 AM)

Their idealogy guarantees them a high place in the afterlife. I would not call their acts cowardly, just as much as I would not call them brave. I still do not understand why technology is not used more to go after insurgents and terrorist organizations. I am not just talking about intelligence gathering, but strike capability as well. With RC strike aircraft, and the newly developed ground/water units, there is not much need to put a soldier in harms way to remove threats like this.

As far as a solution goes, the region needs to go through more turmoil so that maybe they can grow as civilizations.




Mercnbeth -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 10:08:56 AM)

Meat,

This quote you referenced by Golda Meir is factually accurate.
quote:

"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist."

The creation of a Palestinian people is as much a creation of the other nations, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, primarily, as it is Israel. They advised the locals, compromised mostly of poor and exploited people, (as usually the case) to leave the area so they wouldn't get killed during the coming war to destroy Israel. Well, it didn't turn out so well, for Egypt in particular. However instead of taking in their disenfranchised compatriots, the turned them into refugees, gave them a few weapons and helped created a, to date, 50 year problem that won't be going away anytime soon.

Please Note - I'm saying the other nations contributed - NOT caused the creation of Palestinians. However Mrs. Meir's quote is factually accurate and shouldn't be put in the same category of reciprocal hatred as should the others.

PS - Hope you stay off "double secret probation" for a while.





kdsub -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 10:44:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I think coward can be used to describe a suicide bomber. Although a difference in cultures does weigh in this discussion.



You're talking nonsense. You can describe suicide bombers as many things but cowards is not one of them.



No more nonsense then your ranting... and yes they are cowards as I described them... but of course just a point of view. Myself, unless I was on my deathbed or hopeless I would want to face my enemy not kill indiscriminately men women and children.

I call that cowardly...anyone who would kill the innocent for personal gain... without out fear of retribution…even if in heaven...even if misguided or duped...  is  still a despicable coward.


Butch




meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 12:40:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Meat,

This quote you referenced by Golda Meir is factually accurate.
quote:

"There is no such thing as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist."

The creation of a Palestinian people is as much a creation of the other nations, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, primarily, as it is Israel. They advised the locals, compromised mostly of poor and exploited people, (as usually the case) to leave the area so they wouldn't get killed during the coming war to destroy Israel. Well, it didn't turn out so well, for Egypt in particular. However instead of taking in their disenfranchised compatriots, the turned them into refugees, gave them a few weapons and helped created a, to date, 50 year problem that won't be going away anytime soon.

Please Note - I'm saying the other nations contributed - NOT caused the creation of Palestinians. However Mrs. Meir's quote is factually accurate and shouldn't be put in the same category of reciprocal hatred as should the others.

PS - Hope you stay off "double secret probation" for a while.




Actually it was the British that told many of the local Arabs in Trans-Jordania to leave the area and return in a couple of days because they expected trouble. The father of a friend of mine was told to leave by British troops and he didn't like many other Arabs didn't, both Christian and muslim, they were then made to leave their homes at gun point by the zionists and told not to return unless they wanted to stay permanently, as in buried. I not only know this from an Arab perspective but also from an uncle of mine who was a British conscript and was stationed in the Jaffa area and was one of the troops telling the Arabs at the time to leave for their own safety. That was before the British cut and run. The zionists ethnically cleansed that part of Trans-Jordania to give it its proper name, at gun point. The west and particularly the US like to stress the fact that the Arab countries told the Arabs of trans-Jordaia to leave and while it is partly true, it is not wholly true. As in most instances in the ME, the west's dirty fingerprints are all over the situation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba




meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 12:45:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I think coward can be used to describe a suicide bomber. Although a difference in cultures does weigh in this discussion.



You're talking nonsense. You can describe suicide bombers as many things but cowards is not one of them.



No more nonsense then your ranting... and yes they are cowards as I described them... but of course just a point of view. Myself, unless I was on my deathbed or hopeless I would want to face my enemy not kill indiscriminately men women and children.

I call that cowardly...anyone who would kill the innocent for personal gain... without out fear of retribution…even if in heaven...even if misguided or duped...  is  still a despicable coward.


Butch


Well, they aren't as cowardly as US pilots who murder by push button and don't give a toss who gets killed with their computer games.




meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 12:55:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Their idealogy guarantees them a high place in the afterlife. I would not call their acts cowardly, just as much as I would not call them brave. I still do not understand why technology is not used more to go after insurgents and terrorist organizations. I am not just talking about intelligence gathering, but strike capability as well. With RC strike aircraft, and the newly developed ground/water units, there is not much need to put a soldier in harms way to remove threats like this.

As far as a solution goes, the region needs to go through more turmoil so that maybe they can grow as civilizations.


They are however braver than western soldiers with their push button weapons.  Not that I blame western soldiers for using the weapons they have.

Maybe dying for a cause is not brave, as Bertrand Russell pointed out, people prefer to die than to think and that goes for all the dead American soldiers too.

and Brits.




kdsub -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 2:11:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Well, they aren't as cowardly as US pilots who murder by push button and don't give a toss who gets killed with their computer games.


And of course you are privy to the minds and motives of all US pilots... you do know the rules of engagement or designed to limit civilian casualties. At least they try not to kill civilians… Your cherished…brave…bombers seem to target indiscriminately…based only on how it will benefit their cause… If that means killing school children to show how the US can’t protect… or killing out of hate for a different sect or religion… they are more than happy to kill. And use the unfortunate… sick, unstable, young, impressionable, and weak minded to accomplish it.

If you were to take your wrath out on those leaders that got us into this war, rather then defend butchers and cowards, I would agree with you.

Butch




PanthersMom -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 2:30:08 PM)

i dated a lebanese guy many yrs ago who wanted marriage and to move back home outside beirut.  glad i dodged that bullet!  literally!  i think we should leave them to their own devices, let them kill each other til there's nobody left standing and then maybe offer them assistance in rebuilding with our help. for considerations to be named later.  let them settle it themselves, bring our kids home.  maybe if we didn't jump in and stick our noses in all the time they'd learn to do it themselves.  if not, well they'd leave some halfway decent real estate behind as long as they didn't get too stupid and nuke it all.

PM




Marc2b -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 4:53:49 PM)

quote:

Palestinian hatred huh? I wonder where they got it from. How about a quote or two from Ben Gurion... etc.


Even if you accept the premise that the Palestinians are blameless in the origins are their current problems, they can not escape responsibility for their continuation. It doesn’t matter who first "asked" who to dance – there are two people in the dance. Violence begets violence begets violence ad nauseam. After a while it no longer becomes about the political issues involved, it becomes personal. That is when it is no longer just about anger but about hatred. Hatred clouds reason but in and of itself does not compel violence. The violence remains a choice, and ultimately, so does the hatred and the anger.

I never said the Israelis are blameless but any objective review of the history of the conflict shows that Israel (the majority of Israelis anyway, they do have their lunatic fringe) is willing to come to terms. The majority of Palestinians continue to refuse to come to terms (it seems to me that they don’t have a lunatic fringe but rather a lunatic mainstream). They reject the very concept of Israel. Someone once said (and I forget who so all due credit to whoever credit is due) that the Palestinians do want peace, but that they want it without Israel, not with Israel. In pursuit of that goal they have shown themselves willing to go to such extremes as to deliberately sacrifice their own children. In the process they sacrifice so much more. They condemn themselves poverty and squalor. They condemn themselves to lives without joy.

I said earlier that the solution was for one side to be victorious over the other. I’m afraid that was the cynical side of me showing through (although I prefer to call it "excessive pragmatism"). There is, however, another possibility and the power to implement it lies in the hands of the Palestinians. That third option is for the Palestinians to simply give up. Give up the goal of destroying Israel. Give up the suicide attacks. Give up the bombs and the raids. To put down their weapons and broker a real peace treaty with Israel, and then live up to it (this will require both sides to clamp down on their extremists).

Indeed, if the Palestinians were smart they would abandon their policy of violence and adopt a policy of nonviolence. I know, the image of Palestinians joining hands and singing "we shall overcome," seems a bit far fetched (which is why I am excessively pragmatic about it) but not only would Israel come to terms (which they have shown themselves willing to do) but they would probably be willing to come to generous terms quickly.

If an actual peace were established the Palestinians could then get to work improving their lives. Peace allows for commerce and trade (so long as the freedom to engage in such is also present) which in turn allows prosperity. It won’t happen overnight (people move at the speed of life) but within even one generation they could see remarkable improvements in their quality of life. But this brings us back to the beginning. In order for this to happen the Palestinians will have to decide that they love their children more than they hate Israel.

Nothing good comes of hate.




meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 11:36:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Well, they aren't as cowardly as US pilots who murder by push button and don't give a toss who gets killed with their computer games.


And of course you are privy to the minds and motives of all US pilots... you do know the rules of engagement or designed to limit civilian casualties. At least they try not to kill civilians… Your cherished…brave…bombers seem to target indiscriminately…based only on how it will benefit their cause… If that means killing school children to show how the US can’t protect… or killing out of hate for a different sect or religion… they are more than happy to kill. And use the unfortunate… sick, unstable, young, impressionable, and weak minded to accomplish it.

If you were to take your wrath out on those leaders that got us into this war, rather then defend butchers and cowards, I would agree with you.

Butch


There have been enough innocent victims killed and enough cockpit videos secreted out to the media that shows criminal negligence is not as rare as it should be.




Termyn8or -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/16/2008 11:56:46 PM)

OK kd, let's talk about these, ummmmmm non-people in your eyes apparently.

How's about they come here, bomb your city, kill a bunch of your relatives, destroy the infrastructure so you have no electricity or water, bomb the local hospitals and once they find out the local TV stastions are broadcasting what they are doing, bomb them.

You are shut off, cut off and I would hope quite put off.

Your family is mostly dead, you are starving and thirsty. If you are Palestinian water is for sale, but you have no money right now.

I mean the Arabs literally come to St Louis and take it over. A stronghold. You are under their rule now. Would you like that ? They took the guns, they took everything, you have nothing and not even the tools nor materials to build anything that could rid your country of these oppressors.

Your family is dead, except for a brother and maybe a cousin in Gitmo getting tortured.

How the fuck would you like that ?

If you can't see two sides to everything almost, I just don't know what to tell you.

T




meatcleaver -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/17/2008 12:05:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

quote:

Palestinian hatred huh? I wonder where they got it from. How about a quote or two from Ben Gurion... etc.


Even if you accept the premise that the Palestinians are blameless in the origins are their current problems, they can not escape responsibility for their continuation. It doesn’t matter who first "asked" who to dance – there are two people in the dance. Violence begets violence begets violence ad nauseam. After a while it no longer becomes about the political issues involved, it becomes personal. That is when it is no longer just about anger but about hatred. Hatred clouds reason but in and of itself does not compel violence. The violence remains a choice, and ultimately, so does the hatred and the anger.

I never said the Israelis are blameless but any objective review of the history of the conflict shows that Israel (the majority of Israelis anyway, they do have their lunatic fringe) is willing to come to terms. The majority of Palestinians continue to refuse to come to terms (it seems to me that they don’t have a lunatic fringe but rather a lunatic mainstream). They reject the very concept of Israel. Someone once said (and I forget who so all due credit to whoever credit is due) that the Palestinians do want peace, but that they want it without Israel, not with Israel. In pursuit of that goal they have shown themselves willing to go to such extremes as to deliberately sacrifice their own children. In the process they sacrifice so much more. They condemn themselves poverty and squalor. They condemn themselves to lives without joy.

I said earlier that the solution was for one side to be victorious over the other. I’m afraid that was the cynical side of me showing through (although I prefer to call it "excessive pragmatism"). There is, however, another possibility and the power to implement it lies in the hands of the Palestinians. That third option is for the Palestinians to simply give up. Give up the goal of destroying Israel. Give up the suicide attacks. Give up the bombs and the raids. To put down their weapons and broker a real peace treaty with Israel, and then live up to it (this will require both sides to clamp down on their extremists).

Indeed, if the Palestinians were smart they would abandon their policy of violence and adopt a policy of nonviolence. I know, the image of Palestinians joining hands and singing "we shall overcome," seems a bit far fetched (which is why I am excessively pragmatic about it) but not only would Israel come to terms (which they have shown themselves willing to do) but they would probably be willing to come to generous terms quickly.

If an actual peace were established the Palestinians could then get to work improving their lives. Peace allows for commerce and trade (so long as the freedom to engage in such is also present) which in turn allows prosperity. It won’t happen overnight (people move at the speed of life) but within even one generation they could see remarkable improvements in their quality of life. But this brings us back to the beginning. In order for this to happen the Palestinians will have to decide that they love their children more than they hate Israel.

Nothing good comes of hate.


So you think that Palestinians giving in will produce peace? It will win the same type of peace the Indians won in the US, their land and their assets stolen and if you don't live to your victor's rules, fuck off back to your reservation and drink yourself silly. Suicide bombings are a symptom of oppression, it is commited by people who feel they have nothing left to lose. To paraphrase Marx, the Palestinians have nothing left to lose but their chains. The existing Palestinian position of 'if we can't have our freedom, you won't enjoy yours' is a position of attrition and maybe ultimate futile but desperate people make futile decisions. They know with their own eyes, their own experience and the words of the Israeli elite that the Israelis want to  ethnically cleanse them. Even while Bush's rather belated efforts to encourage peace with the West Bank Palestinians is going on, Israel is sanctioning yet more settlements on the West Bank. So much for Israeli good faith, they are still doing exactly what they have always have done and said they would do way back in '48, stealing Palestinian land. The Israelis know they can't ethnically cleanse the Palestinians all at once, not even western hypocrisy will go that far but they know they can do it through a slow process and the US will carry on backing them. The Palestinian's only hope is that the US will eventually tire of bank rolling Israel because it is undermining US foreign policy in the area. The west are rightfully seen as the ultimate hypocrites in the ME so it is not just in the interests of both sides of the conflict that there is a resolution but in the interests of the west too. However, it is doubtful there will ever be a US President strong enough to face down the pro-Israeli lobby back home so the US against its own interest will never force the only solution, pre '67 borders. That is really the only solution in the long run.

Nothing does come of hate so with Israel holdng all the cards, perhaps they could stop hating and show good faith, something they have consistently failed to do. What would be more helpful would be the US being a honest broker rather than consistently promoting Israeli policy in the area.

Oh, it was the Israelis that condemned the Palestinians to poverty and squalor, you really should look at the reality of Israeli policy and not the pro-Israeli propaganda that American news chanels show. If the Palestinians weren't fighting, they would have less than they have now, they wouldn't have any land left that could be potentially a state.

The text on these sites are partial/biased but the maps are accurate. http://www.ccmep.org/delegations/maps/palestine.html

http://www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=225




Marc2b -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/17/2008 7:51:13 PM)

quote:

So you think that Palestinians... etc...


The Palestinians had the opportunity to have their own state in 1947. The rejected it because they refused to accept the existence of Israel. They continue to refuse to accept the existence of Israel. That, is what continues to drive this conflict. You focus on a root cause, reduced to a simplistic "good guy versus bad guys" scenario. I am looking beyond that. If you slip on some ice, fall onto to the sidewalk and break your arm, you can rant and rave about the negligent homeowner who didn’t clear his sidewalk all you want – it’s not going to solve the problem of the broken arm. You need to get up and go to the hospital. Likewise the Palestinians can throw rocks and blow up their children all they want, it’s clearly not solving the problem of securing a Palestinian state. In fact, it is showing itself to be counter productive.

You continue to speak of the Israelis as if they all want to wipe out the Palestinians. Absolutes are seldom true and I’ve seen no evidence that even the majority of Israelis want to utterly destroy the Palestinians, your quoting of a few fanatics aside. I believe that the majority of Israelis would welcome (or at least accept) a Palestinian state – including the withdrawal of the settlements (the settlers will howl no doubt but nobody said this was going to be easy or fair) if it meant peace. The major problem from their point of view is that they don’t trust the Palestinians not to stop attacking them, which is why they want fences, military checkpoints, security zones and even the settlements for now (your enemy can’t use a particular piece of real estate to attack you from if he doesn’t control it).

You state that a return to the pre-1967 borders would be the only solution in the long run. I would go even further and say something resembling the 1947 partition plan (including Jerusalem as an international city) would be the more just solution. Granted the Israelis would not be as keen on this (particularly giving up Jerusalem) as they are in accepting the existence of a Palestinian state. And we know that the Palestinians won’t accept it. Which brings us back to the original problem. How do we get there from here?

Since it is the Palestinians refusal to accept the existence of Israel that continues to drive the conflict, the power to end it lies in their hands. First, by giving up their desire to destroy Israel. It is not going to happen, at least, not in a way that doesn’t destroy themselves in the process. If they take that first step they open the door to a peaceful solution.

The next step would be the rejection of violence and the adoption of non-violent resistence. It helped free India from Britain and to launch the civil rights movement in America – who’s to say it won’t work in this situation. Remember Bull Connor attacking non-violent protesters with dogs and fire hoses? Imagine scenes like that playing out everyday in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Any American President (of either party), not to mention leaders all over the world would soon find themselves heavily pressured by public opinion to lean heavily on Israel. Israel herself (and the pro-Israeli lobby) would stand shamed before the world. It’s hard to generate sympathy when you’re beating up on unarmed people who won’t hit back. It’s not so hard when your kids are being blown up by people who strap bombs on their own kids to do it.

That is the ultimate reason why violence is self defeating to their cause. People come to focus on the results of the violence and lose sympathy despite any legitimate grievances the Palestinians may have.

You can continue to rant and rave about Israel did this and Israel did that, the Palestinians can continue with the violence but the results will only be a continuation of the status quo for years – if not decades – to come, perhaps ending in annihilation. Or, the Palestinians can decide to take a different path. They can decide that they love their children more than they hate Israel. They can decide that peace with their Jewish neighbors and prosperity for themselves is worth more than revenge. From what I’ve seen I can’t say I am overly optimistic that they will make such a choice, but that choice is theirs.




kdsub -> RE: The Middle East Solution? (1/17/2008 8:20:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

OK kd, let's talk about these, ummmmmm non-people in your eyes apparently.

How's about they come here, bomb your city, kill a bunch of your relatives, destroy the infrastructure so you have no electricity or water, bomb the local hospitals and once they find out the local TV stastions are broadcasting what they are doing, bomb them.

You are shut off, cut off and I would hope quite put off.

Your family is mostly dead, you are starving and thirsty. If you are Palestinian water is for sale, but you have no money right now.

I mean the Arabs literally come to St Louis and take it over. A stronghold. You are under their rule now. Would you like that ? They took the guns, they took everything, you have nothing and not even the tools nor materials to build anything that could rid your country of these oppressors.

Your family is dead, except for a brother and maybe a cousin in Gitmo getting tortured.

How the fuck would you like that ?

If you can't see two sides to everything almost, I just don't know what to tell you.

T

T..... You must not read my posts or you would know my feelings on this war... or maybe you just like to type then read your own words over and over again...damn you sure do a lot of that... longest posts on CM.

I am not for this war… I would love to see Bush and his bunch held accountable…BUT I won’t call our boys and girls in uniform indiscriminate murders. Nor will I equate cowardly murders as their equal.

Just because we were wrong does not make suicide bombers and their recruiters freedom fighters... They are not some kind of noble heroes. They often intentionally kill innocents …cut off heads of reporters and helpless prisoners… beat women… blow up school children… there were children on those planes flown into the Trade center… on and on.

Our leaders may be idiots but our men and woman in uniform are just like you and me…not murders. On the whole they are good people that would not kill if given a choice or another way.


Butch




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625