For those have you then have endured penis chastity

For those have you then have endured penis chastity (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

touchofeuphoria -> For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/15/2008 8:36:12 PM)
If you don't mind I just have a few questions. For any of you that have, how has your experience been with the CB6000? How often should I get a prostate milking to keep toxins from building up? (I'm used to masturbating daily - I don't know if that helps) Will it be much easier to milk myself(ex who is putting the device on me isn't into that) the longer I wait? If i shower daily, will I be able to wear it 24/7 without having to take it off to clean my penis?

Siona -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/15/2008 8:58:20 PM)
You have an email.

toosmooth -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/20/2008 6:19:09 PM)
Hey there, im also interested in purching a CB600, and was wondering some of the same questions if I wear it 24/7. Can I shower and clean myself, use the bathroom? Im also uncut, so will I be able to clean under my foreskin with the chasity on? Or will my Mistress have to release me every time I wash? Also, ...im new to the trem milking.......I understand it massaging the prostate....but are you actully able to climax from that alone if you have been chasityed long enough? Thanks

trueshadow -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/21/2008 11:15:37 AM)
There is no evidence that 'toxins' build up in the body if one doesn't have sex. There are many people for whom ejaculation is impossible, yet they have no health problems. Forced chastity is indeed a torture, but it is due to the frustration of the impulse to orgasm.

ThundersCry -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/28/2008 11:47:49 AM)
Your not gonna build up any toxins, like its been stated... There has been very little change in the line of cb* the past few yrs...* Milking yourself? Good luck! You will be able to wash... Enjoy the mood swings =L=

slavekal -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/28/2008 8:34:24 PM)
I have heard that not ejaculating for long periods is bad for the prostate. No?

RedMagic1 -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/28/2008 8:44:28 PM)
Yes, slavekal, you are correct, according at least to the National Cancer Institute. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/04/07/MNGS161ML91.DTL Also, vigorous prostate milking can be dangerous. Gentle massage done by a trained professional is the only activity considered medically safe. http://www.chronicprostatitis.com/massage.html For what it's worth, OP, prostate self-milking sounds like the first sentence of an ER doctor's latest funny story.

GoddessTeaze -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/29/2008 12:06:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: toosmooth Hey there, im also interested in purching a CB600, and was wondering some of the same questions if I wear it 24/7. Can I shower and clean myself, use the bathroom? Im also uncut, so will I be able to clean under my foreskin with the chasity on? Or will my Mistress have to release me every time I wash? hello toosmooth, you can shower, and pee with it, and you'll be able to clean it all when it's off, but you can wear it for a certain amount of time, before you'll get in trouble. quote: Also, ...im new to the term milking.......I understand it massaging the prostate....but are you actully able to climax from that alone if you have been chasityed long enough? Yes you've to milk yourself at least every four weeks, is what I've read about it, then the prostate will be full. It's hard to milk an empty prostate. And no it won't give you any satisfaction, only for the Domme it is, that you didn't came but stay frustrated!! [sm=evil.gif] as it should B! Warm Greetingz and goodluck GoddezzT`

tigerstyle -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/29/2008 11:37:47 AM)
I'm just laughing at the thread title: "Endured Penis Chastity". I wish I'd said that. and "prostate toxin buildup". WHere do you get this stuff? "I need a handjob, babe! I've got toxins building up!"

suessub -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/29/2008 1:57:52 PM)
Let me write from personal experience. I am currently locked up in a CB6000. My Mistress keeps me in it 24/7. Every few days, if no other reason has presented itself, she gives me a chance to clean myself. It is enough to just remove the cock-cage, clean myself and the cage and lock it back on. Purel on the cage makes sure it stays clean. (Purel on my cock is a topic for another day.) Takes about 10 minutes. Otherwise, no problems with using the toilet. Naturally, sit to pee. I too am uncut and to stay clean on a daily basis involves the liberal use of q-tips after peeing. I use a wet q-tip to clean under the foreskin. I also use a soapy one to clean outside the penis. Silicone lub is also your friend; good to keep where the plastic contacts the skin lubed so there is little friction. Briefs better than boxers, as they provide better support. Otherwise the constant tug on the scrotum gets painful. Now, my experience isn't so long term. Mistress has been having me were the CB6000 since Xmas. In that time, she have twice released me so she could enjoy herself with me until I cum. Far more often than that she will release me so she can enjoy me but lock me up before I finish. She loves the sound of me whimpering and begging when she stops. As it stands now, it has been over two weeks since my last orgasm. But the part that really drives me nuts is being unable to even make any contact "down there". We both love how her keeping me locked up acts as a constant reminder that she has all the power. If you have more questions, just post them. I will answer as best I can.

trueshadow -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/30/2008 4:52:27 PM)
The article in question said 'may' reduce prostate cancer, and the effect was pronounced in the teen-age years, which was a long time ago for me. But you could use this article to try to convince your Domme to let you come to orgasm at least once in a while!

RedMagic1 -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/30/2008 9:41:39 PM)
OMG, trueshadow, have you ever looked at a pack of cigarettes? The Surgeon General warns that smoking MAY be hazardous to your health. The National Cancer Institute is a US government body, and "may" is governmentspeak for "yeah, it's gonna fuck you up but we don't want a million-dollar libel suit on our hands from the International Chastity Belt Lovers Association." Long-term male chastity is edge-play and medically inadvisable. So's smoking. If you want to do either one, fine, but if you post on a public forum that they are safe, you are potentially hurting someone besides yourself, and that's not cool.

suessub -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/31/2008 11:53:52 AM)
RedMagic1, I went straight to the soure: Ejaculation Frequency and Subsequent Risk of Prostate Cancer (JAMA). The abstrast does give a lot of comparisons on the risks for those "reporting 21 or more ejaculations per month compared with men reporting 4 to 7 ejaculations per month". Averaged across lifetimes, the first group has 0.67 (95% CI, 0.51-0.89) the risk as the second group. I can see how this might make one think that orgasm denial and male chastity is edge play. But I will provide one more quote from the abstract quote: ...Ejaculation frequency was not statistically significantly associated with risk of advanced prostate cancer. Conclusions Our results suggest that ejaculation frequency is not related to increased risk of prostate cancer. The study was conducted to test the idea that increased sexuality was a risk factor in prostate cancer. What they conclude is there is no significant relation between the two. I still need to read the whole article (only 9 pages), but I imagine how the conclusion jives with the above quoted stats is that other factors are greater risks, to the point to make these results "noise" the the risk assessment. One last quote from the sfgate article linked above: quote: the authors seemed to play down the apparent protective effects of male orgasm, in part because there is no agreement as to what might account for the protection. Not only does a statistical correlation need to exist, a causal connection must be found and that is still not present. EDIT: Ok, actually reading the full article. We can completely rule out the idea that male chastity is anything close to edge play. quote: We noted a suggestive decrease in risk of total and organ-confined prostate cancer among men in the lowest category of ejaculation frequency across a lifetime. The lowest category is defined as those reporting 0-3 ejaculations a month. Also bear this is mind when thinking about the results reported: quote: self-reported ejaculation frequency may have contained some inaccuracy because of its sensitive nature and the need for individuals to recall ejaculation frequency in the distant past. Ask most men, and I think they would over-estimate how often they cum as opposed to under-estimate.

RedMagic1 -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/31/2008 3:45:19 PM)
Do a search on the boards. Men have written wrenching posts about how they are unable to find pleasure with a new mistress because they were trained to come only if the former mistress gave permission, and it has caused them long-term (perhaps permanent) emotional damage. Long-term chastity is edge play at best, from both a medical and psychological perspective. Medical studies are written in cover-your-ass-speak. You are quoting it as though it is normal English. It's not. You can tell what people really think based on subsequent recommendations from institutions and doctors. Anyone considering long-term chastity should consult with a urologist for a frank medical opinion, not someone of unknown qualifications cutting and pasting on a web site.

suessub -> RE: For those have you then have endured penis chastity (1/31/2008 4:49:53 PM)
quote: someone of unknown qualifications cutting and pasting on a web site I did not mean to suggest my cut and pastes were enough to convince anyone. Only to suggest at the contents of the article in question. I assume anyone interested would read the article themselves. Unfortunately, the nature of these forums necessitates leaving one's qualifications unknown. Suffice it to say, I do have the prerequisite qualifications to read and understand peer-reviewed published articles. I do like your suggestion that long-term chastity play should be done in consultation with a urologist. Or at least with regular prostate exams. "has caused them long-term (perhaps permanent) emotional damage." I think that can be said of most aspects of the BDSM lifestyle, especially when taken to one's limits and beyond. I assume we are talking about partners for which the choice to include chastity in their relationship is being done in a Safe, Sane and Consensual manner. Any time I need to break from being locked, be it physical or mental, I am naturally granted as much. Where is my Mistress's fun if she lets her toys get broken? "they were trained to come only if the former mistress gave permission" Or if they were trained to only cum after a good caning? Should we now view caning as edge play? I don't buy it. If someone finds themselves conditioned in such a manner, more likely that was in them to start. The situation only brought it to the surface. Be careful when you play. You can never unlearn the things you may learn about yourself.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125