|
Maya2001 -> RE: Proflie pictures (1/18/2008 6:49:10 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: takenbyjohnr07
i mean revealing by where all that's in the picture is almost bare breasts or some very provacative sexual pose. Then they complain that the only responses that they get are from creeps and from people who just want sex.
If you don't want to be identified (which i can understand) put it in your profile that you will send a picture upon request. That's what i did in the begining Then i just put it up.
I used the cut off head photos at first because of concerns about being identified, I work at a place where there are 2000 male co-workers and was a bit concerned about the reactions if someone found, over time I finally came to accept that if they are here they are likely in the lifestyle too, so would have to admit being a kinkster and would be outing themselves, so I stopped worrying about
As for revealing pictures, the one I have in my album that is the most revealing has produced the least amount of negative comment emails when I had as my main profile picture, if anything garnered more respect. It also indentified me strongly as submissive so I had less emails from submissives looking for someone to top them. My current main photo interestingly has produced the greatest number of emails moreso than my backside showing, though my photos maybe described as sexual I don't find myself getting a large number of wankers emailing me, I found I get far less here than I had on prior vanilla sites without a photo of a sexual nature. If I do get comments on my photos from those who enjoying perving photo they tend to be highly respectful
I think too many make the assumption that revealing equates with sex automatically for example if you look at photos of the statue of David or Venus de Milo would the first thing that would enter your mind be fucking??? or the beauty or gracefulness of?
|
|
|
|
