|
DesFIP -> RE: toilet training (1/22/2008 7:42:16 AM)
|
Sorry RoughFN but the specific act does matter. If a sub was told to go down to the worst area of town and told to turn tricks with no protection, would you consider him/her refusing to being a bad submissive? Or would you not think they were being smart people by not wanting to be beaten and given life threatening diseases?
If a sub feels something is unsafe, either emotionally and/or physically, then a smart dominant takes their worries under advisement and does enough research to prove it is safe, or changes the parameters to protect the sub. In this case the 'master' promised faithfulness but has been cheating without protection. That's not someone who cares about the sub's health, just someone who wants to get all his kinks met before the sub comes to his senses and flees.
|
|
|
|
