darchChylde -> RE: Headline: 'Pet' girl on leash ejected from bus (1/24/2008 2:30:43 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Furf so does that mean when my wife boards a bus with her seizure alert dog, that the dog has to have its leash taken off? they cant enforce an arbritory rule.... my wife travels on all the subways and busses of manhatten quite often .. id love to see the day a bus driver tells her to remove the dogs leash. There have long been precedents for making exceptions in the case of the various types of medical aid dogs; but as important as we tend to feel our lifestyle is, i doubt that we'll ever be able to convince the various judiciary systems of the world that our kinks are necessary for medical purposes. Your question, my friend; is like comparing apples and bicycles; the relation is only by the longest stretch of imagination. Now for those people who want to get into other people's faces over this being dicussed elsewhere. Get over it, if you don't want to read it; then don't. It's like complaining that there are two seperate conversations in a resturaunt about the US presidential race. You might want to say it's cluttering up the forums; but hey, it's pixels on a screen. That is akin to complaining that Newsweek and USA today are running the same syndicated column or Associated Press release. So you may want to complain about wasted bandwith; in that case, do you actually think that your complaints will effect anybody else's action? People are carrying on a conversation, and you interrupt without actually contributing (as for the person who complained and still contributed, where does that make sense?); a 20 page thread takes up so little actual bandwith that to complain about that makes about as much sense as complaining about your one post. Perhaps the OP should have used the search feature before posting. But guess what, he didn't; and i'm thankful. I may not have ever ran across the other threads, and i generally won't read or post in a thread that already has several pages before i even see it.
|
|
|
|