domiguy
Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006 Status: offline
|
Why would anyone want to verify a story? It doesn't begin to suprise me. Firm is a believer it doesn't take factual information to get him motivated enough to reproduce a story...just as long as it fits his overall conservative agenda...The truth is just a mere inconvenience for people like Firm. Nothing to base an opinion on. Typical. I immediately googled the article and the author. I have never passed on an article without doing so. I get a ton of crap emailed to me by friends....Some to the left some to the right. I never pass it onward without finding out if it is credible. People with no regard for the truth will just send it on....Wow. I don't have the time nor the technical expertise to determine which side of the story is correct...But here are some interesting links if one is so inclined to realize there is usually more than one side to the story. http://www.betterworldclub.com/articles/hummer-not-more-efficient.htm Here is something I pulled from another source....It is interesting as I read through it and it seems to make some sense. 1. Take the "spitting distance" mileage, for example. The new EPA combined mileage put the Chevy Aveo at 26 mpg, the Toyota Prius at 46 mpg. So I guess 20 miles more per gallon is "spitting distance." 2. The "Dust-to-dust" study is from a marketing firm, not a science journal. It arrives at an artificially high cost for the Prius by assigning it an arbitrary lifespan of 100k miles, and a Hummer 300k miles. There's Prius being used as cabs that have 200k on them now (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8839690/ ). And, insofar as a car lasting, what car do you expect to repair less? A Toyota Prius or a GM Hummer? You can check Consumer Reports for the answer to that one. 3. The Sudbury info is seriously outdated, and the comment about moon buggies (like, when did Nasa test moon buggies — early 1970’s) ought to give you a clue. Sudbury was polluted by a century of mining. In fact, some of Sudbury’s nickel went into making the Statue of Liberty. Currently, the mine is owned by INCO (not Toyota), and produces 100,000 tons of nickel a year, of which Toyota buys 1000 tons. Nickel, by the way, is primarily used to make stainless steel. The Mail on Sunday newspaper, which ran the story the college article is a thin re-write of (visible here http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=417227&in_page_id=1770 ), used a stock photo from 1994 to illustrate the pollution (visible here http://www.photoboy.com/bin/Cklb?vmo=1173985067754 ). There, ahem, were as yet 0 Prius built in 1994. Sudbury is no longer as polluted, as INCO and the city have planted over 8 million trees there since 1979. You can see reports on that on the Sudbury city website at http://www.city.greatersudbury.on.ca/cms/index.cfm?app=div_landreclamation&lang=en The acid rain problem David Martin of Greenpeace is talking about in is the situation pre 1972! INCO on regreening and SO2 emissions http://www.inco.com/development/community/profiles/sudbury/default.aspx INCO on hybrids batteries http://www.inco.com/newscentre/featurestories/apr1305.aspx
< Message edited by domiguy -- 1/25/2008 3:41:48 PM >
_____________________________
|