|
littlebitxxx -> RE: It was in Cosmo so it must be true... (1/29/2008 1:53:37 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro
This isn't about positions per se - it's more about pleasure zones, spacial relationships between bodies in motion, and maybe something to do with gravity. Everything I am about to describe can be achieved in other ways, and other positions, also. Can, and is, achieved in other ways, much more pleasurable to both in some cases.
But, here's the reason I think the Cosmo poll turned out the way it did:
The woman on top position places the woman's sex squarely on the male organ but with the extra effect of gravity bearing down. This has the multiple effect of stimulating a probably larger area of the vaginal lips, But only if you're able to bounce up and down more than 1/2 inch or so to cause said friction.
direct stimulation of the clitoris (if the pose is too perpendicular the woman can lean forward and hopefully achieve a greater contact area on her clitoris), However, I find that my clit needs a wee bit more than the occasional bump and grind to actually feel good enough to be called stimulation.
AND internal stimulation of the famed G-spot. If it is not possible to stimulate the clitoris and the G-spot simultaneously, then the woman is in position to precisely orchestrate alternating stimulation as she pleases. I may be built weird but my G-spot is toward the front not the back. Leaning forward brings the cock head in more direct contact with the back
So that pose is at least a triple whammy in some cases. Not all couples are going to get those exact results, but I expect that those results are fairly common. Depends on how many and who you ask.
As a dominant man I enjoy the woman on top position because I am entirely being serviced. Aye, there's the gist of it right there.
While I am hardly just laying there, I am not probably doing the most work. I kind of see it as being sucked off by my slave's cunt. When she orgasms, the sucking is just harder and more insistent. IF being on top actually produces an orgasm.
And anyway, I think a post orgasmic stupor is conducive to other kinds of sexual play during rounds 2, 3, 4, 5...
It's sometimes good to start things with a bang!
I've answered a few of the comments here only to show I'm not a huge fan of being on top (gee, can ya tell?) First off, I'm short so being on top of anyone less than really really really skinny means my knees don't reach to either side. Wiggling back and forth up there kinda like a flea on a horse just doesn't cut it. To put my feet under me and use legs is a big advantage but I defy anyone to be able to do that for any length of time without cramping or tiring....and concentrating on staying balanced kinda takes the fun out of the riding, no?
So the whole "Ride me, take your pleasure from me" thing just doesn't sit well with me. I get the image of a dil suction-cupped to a table and riding that. Pretty much same amount of pleasure. Considering there are so many positions, imagination is pretty much the only limit, woman on top or missionary are not the only two which seem to the be the basis for a lot of position debates. Dominant, submissive, control, who does the work (??)....should have no bearing on just enjoying the act of sex.
|
|
|
|
