RE: Thread Hijacking

RE: Thread Hijacking (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

CalifChick -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 3:33:26 PM)
It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali

fluffyswitch -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 3:34:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali huh? now i really am confused. i think i'm gonna just keep fighting with my feminist psych reading...

lusciouslips19 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 3:58:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: fluffyswitch quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali huh? now i really am confused. i think i'm gonna just keep fighting with my feminist psych reading... stay that way. I like that about you![:)]

laurell3 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:01:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali Well to be fair I did get a note on a day I was stuck at home with a sinus infection and was rampaging all over the boards indiscriminately and spuriously on meds and stressed over not being able to be working on all the things I needed to, so I'm not sure your statement in regards to me is totally true and the note was honestly deserved.

fluffyswitch -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:04:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19 quote: ORIGINAL: fluffyswitch quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali huh? now i really am confused. i think i'm gonna just keep fighting with my feminist psych reading... stay that way. I like that about you![:)] see..people have commented on me running in circles on these threads...but at least that way i don't get lost...

MistressOfGa -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:07:05 PM)
I know one thing...If I have to read "Not to derail this thread..but" and "Not to hi-jack this thread..but.." I will scream. MoGa Who doesn't like walking on eggshells, dammit!

IrishMist -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:09:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa I know one thing...If I have to read "Not to derail this thread..but" and "Not to hi-jack this thread..but.." I will scream. MoGa Who doesn't like walking on eggshells, dammit! I don't. So, I make sure that I don't change anything about the way I post. If it makes me one who is headed for a train wreck; then I'll hit head on doing things the way I always have; and not with my fucking tail between my legs.

kittinSol -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:12:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali Fourteen pages later, and I still don't know which sides they are [X(] .

MistressOfGa -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:32:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist quote: ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa I know one thing...If I have to read "Not to derail this thread..but" and "Not to hi-jack this thread..but.." I will scream. MoGa Who doesn't like walking on eggshells, dammit! I don't. So, I make sure that I don't change anything about the way I post. If it makes me one who is headed for a train wreck; then I'll hit head on doing things the way I always have; and not with my fucking tail between my legs. I agree. I have always been one to advocate freedom of speech. We (In America) have lost so much, does it have to extend to on line message boards? I am who I am. I make no apologies for who I am and what I say. I feel sad that it has come to this, but I do understand why. I have to question it though. Isn't a thread hi-jack subjective? Who is to say what is a hi-jack or derailment and what is a conversation? Most conversations take a left turn with no one batting an eye. The only kind of thread hi-jacking I can't stand is when it becomes a free for all party and the OP is almost forgotten. Sigh.. I don't want to walk on egg shells. But like Mick Jagger says "You can't always get what you want....but if you try sometimes, you just might find..you get what you need.."[;)] MoGa

sexyred1 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:35:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kittinSol quote: ORIGINAL: CalifChick It's not about luscious, or fluffy, or swt, or laurel, or even Ron (no, Ron, it's not about you). The people that it is about know it's about them. "Supporters" (for lack of a better word) of either "side" (agghhhh, again, for lack of a better word) bitching about it back and forth and pointing fingers will resolve nothing and only serve to keep it stirred up. Cali Fourteen pages later, and I still don't know which sides they are [X(] . That's because some play both sides; to be safe or because they would like others to think they are unbiased, which is, of course, impossible.

IrishMist -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:37:31 PM)
Don't get me wrong. I don't fault the moderators. I actually like them quite a bit and don't question when they make decisions like this. What I am up in arms about is the insunation that we are doing this deliberatly to ONE person and ONE person only. That and only that is what has me pissed off royally to the point that I really don't give a flying fuck at this point. If the moderators wish to believe that I would actually limit my humor to a single person...hey, go for it. I don't truly don't give a flying fuck at this point.

sexyred1 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:38:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist quote: ORIGINAL: MistressOfGa I know one thing...If I have to read "Not to derail this thread..but" and "Not to hi-jack this thread..but.." I will scream. MoGa Who doesn't like walking on eggshells, dammit! I don't. So, I make sure that I don't change anything about the way I post. If it makes me one who is headed for a train wreck; then I'll hit head on doing things the way I always have; and not with my fucking tail between my legs. I agree. I have always been one to advocate freedom of speech. We (In America) have lost so much, does it have to extend to on line message boards? I am who I am. I make no apologies for who I am and what I say. I feel sad that it has come to this, but I do understand why. I have to question it though. Isn't a thread hi-jack subjective? Who is to say what is a hi-jack or derailment and what is a conversation? Most conversations take a left turn with no one batting an eye. The only kind of thread hi-jacking I can't stand is when it becomes a free for all party and the OP is almost forgotten. Sigh.. I don't want to walk on egg shells. But like Mick Jagger says "You can't always get what you want....but if you try sometimes, you just might find..you get what you need.."[;)] MoGa MoGa, of course you are right and we have all said the same thing here, a thousand different ways and none of it matters. It is not a free society here. There are rules; subjective rules, but rules nontheless. So walking on eggshells will now become the new black. Unless you want to go on an uplanned vacation.

kittinSol -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:40:24 PM)
I'm still not suitably enlightened, but I now rest assured that my status as an independent (hermit, lone sniper) is the wise path for me :-) . PS: Diogenes, my hero...

mnottertail -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:42:18 PM)
The old chestnut applies here, I think........ Just because you are paranoid is no reason to believe they are not out to get you. TheUnibomber

Raechard -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:44:00 PM)
You can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs. Not that I like omelette eww what a mixture egg and cheese.[8\|] Actually in Littlechef they make omelettes without eggs because once someone asked for fried eggs and the person said they had none but they could do him an omelette; obviously it was one of those frozen microwaveable omelettes.

RedMagic1 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:44:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist I don't truly don't give a flying fuck at this point. Well, I give a fuck. The boards are boring. They used to be funny. Calm down, or I'll show you what a cathartic spanking is.

IrishMist -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:47:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 quote: ORIGINAL: IrishMist I don't truly don't give a flying fuck at this point. Well, I give a fuck. The boards are boring. They used to be funny. Calm down, or I'll show you what a cathartic spanking is. A spanking? That's all I get? Fuck. How about a baseball bat? /looks hopeful

kittinSol -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:47:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Just because you are paranoid is no reason to believe they are not out to get you. Well, Ron, you know what they say... a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

MissMagnolia -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:51:12 PM)
I'm still lost. I don't know who the "sides" are. I don't know who's being picked on. I don't know who the popular girls are. I don't understand anything. There really should be a synopsis somewhere. For people who have a hangover. Not me. I didn't go to a club with friends and disgrace myself. That was someone else. Who isnt me. I don't care what you're thinking.[&:]

lauren0221 -> RE: Thread Hijacking (2/2/2008 4:52:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissMagnolia I'm still lost. I don't know who the "sides" are. I don't know who's being picked on. I don't know who the popular girls are. I don't understand anything. There really should be a synopsis somewhere. For people who have a hangover. Not me. I didn't go to a club with friends and disgrace myself. That was someone else. Who isnt me. I don't care what you're thinking.[&:] Miss M - even with an alleged hangover, you are definitely one of the popular girls. Err.. unless that gets you in trouble, and then you are not?

Page: << < prev 12 13 [14] 15 16 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875