Craftsman
Posts: 885
Joined: 6/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Some day I'll learn to shut up. Maybe now is the time. <shrug> Suffice it to say that I expect the transparent and predictable to do what the transparent and predictable will, and for that reason there is some considerable doubt as to whether this post will be replaced. It wasn't, just added to. I am getting quite an education, however, in the situation in New Orleans in specific and in the pulse of the nation in general, so Thank You, One and All, for the inspiration to study the conditions facing our Nation in some depth. Mayor Ray Nagin is in a very tough position. It takes thought and balance to make the right decisions. On this board, we do not cut each other much slack sometimes. In real life, Ray Nagin faces the very real possibility of his decisions costing lives. That is the natural consequence of being in that kind of position. He is the one who is in the position of authority; without his signature, his state could not apply for Federal aid, and FEMA and the rest of Homeland Security would be essentially barred from responding. Either way he turns, he will face critics as well as find supporters. His position is one I do not envy, and I am certainly not qualified to fill his shoes. I doubt that many if any of the posters here have those qualifications either. My point was, and is, that disaster response is the responsibility of local authority first. Local authority is 'right there' to assess the situation and initiate response. The laws that I have seen applied keep the federal government out of the state and local response until a request is made. Mayor Nagin made that request, and Mayor Nagin signed the forced evacuation order, as is his rightful and lawful authority. No one else has that authority unless and until the Mayor signs his authority over to an Overhead Team in the SEMS system. It is not my position to agree or disagree. I will simply watch and learn. As a side note; the FEMA manuals (available to the public on the FEMA website for no charge except your ISP costs for time, and in any US Government bookstore as listed under 'Government' in the White Pages of most telephone directories) state that a trained disaster responder who finds him/herself in the position of victim in a disaster can be expected to be at less than 30% efficiency. Multiply what and who Mayor Ray Nagin is by a little over 3, and you see what kind of man he is. If he is working at less than that, say at 25% his capacity, then multiply who and what he is by 4 to gain the true measure of the man. The problem is not that "No one will cut him slack." The problem is that he will have detractors no matter which way he turns. Mayor Nagin will also have supporters. That is also true of the Members of Congress, Heads of response agencies, military commanders up to and including Commander in Chief George "Dub-ya" Bush who is, after all, like it or not, President of these United States of America. CNN says that it cuts on party lines; 2/3 of Republicans think President Bush is doing a heroic, fantastic job. 2/3 of Democrats say that 'Dub-ya' is a disgrace to the nation. People on both sides of the debate might do well to recognize and remember, and maybe even, <gasp> learn a little about how and why these seemingly bureaucratic checks and balances exist, even though they sometimes appear to hinder progress. OK, maybe now I shut up.
< Message edited by Craftsman -- 9/7/2005 11:21:11 PM >
|