Questions on the ideology of Female Supremacy.

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

Questions on the ideology of Female Supremacy.

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress >> Questions on the ideology of Female Supremacy.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Questions on the ideology of Female Supremacy. - 2/5/2008 4:21:03 AM

sillyfrillyboy

Posts: 64
Joined: 1/22/2008
Status: offline

First and foremost my intention here is not to state one way or the other about this subject but to simply ask some questions and ask for some feedback.

Coming from a male domminant household as most of us did my father, may he rest in peace, drilled into may head over and over again the belief that man are the kings of there castle. The way I saw this through him is that he felt it was his responsibility and not a God given right which caused him nothing but heartache in his life. With great power comes great responisibility and I firmly believe that the fact that he did not feel he could share this burden with my Mother contibuted to his short and not so joy filled life.

However the seed had been planted in my brain from a very early age so there is almost an involuntary cringe around this subject that I really dont like about myself. I have come to the understanding that these feelings do not stem from anything logical but more over an emotinal responce motivated by fear. Since I believe that it is impossible to find peace with fear in your heart when I notice it I want to iradict it from me body. The only way I have been able to do this is through open and non judgemental discussions about a subject. Allong those lines I think the following responses would be less the helpful in any discussion on this subject.

Any posts utilizing explitives ofcourse to me would be an indication of a fear based mind set in the responce. Any shaming would also be non constructive to open discourse about the subject as this tactic is often used when the persons point of view has very little substance and hence the the equivalent of threats of bodily harm (ie: When ever I am having a discussion with someone and they responce is "I am going to kick your bottom" my immediate thought is that the conversation is over now and this person has no logical intput to offer anymore). Not that everything is based in logic. We are one of the few creatures that rely so heavily on this skill that is quickly causing our own dimise so genuine emotional arguments would be helpful. Ok so on to my questions or things I would like feedback on.

Do women (the ones who follow this ideology) truly want to be in this elivated status remembering that with elivated status comes elivated responsibilities. Take for instance the guy asking a girl out and switch it into this new realm where women take the superior role of initiating romantic relationships. From a male point of view this is by no means pleasant as it opens you up to rejection constantly. Most men deal with this form of anxiety by objectifing women. It is much easier to be rejected by an object then by an actual person. So do female supremacist really want these responsibilities. There are more like providing for a family. Conflict resolution. War. Other nasty business that we humans have a tendancy to get ourselves involved in.

Is it truly satisfing to female supremacist to be submitted to? As a submissive part of what I find exciting is that I am giving something to the Domme or she is taking something from me. In a true female supremacist world these roles would already be defined and submission would be expected. There really would be no power exchange at all since an exchange is a dynamic thing. In anouther light I have always enjoyed the eastern phylosphies that talk of balance between the genders. In an ideal world niether gender would be contrued as being greater or less then the other but that the two people form a whole (yin yang) with the whole being better then the sum of its parts.

When any section of a population has been given a status over any other it has always lead to victimization. Simply look at Germany during ww2 and dont think that both genders where not involved in victimizing the "lesser" races. would this ideology not lead to similar occurances. Would not the opinions of the "weaker" sex be given less wieght since the have been proven to be inferior. Would not the perceptions of these people be based on gender just as it has been based on race in the past.

Is the information about men as being inferior to women in realms such as schooling genetic or is it cultural? Since our society has such strict rules about the genders could this not contribute to the problem. Growing up I liked guns and I liked barbies but one day the barbies went away and I was shamed into believing that society would reject a boy who liked barbies. Certainly my father would no longer love me if I did not "Man up" (ofcourse thats bunk because I know he could never stop loving me as I was his child but at the time I listened to his words and had not leanred to interpret them into 1930's speak which was when he was raised. In many asain cultures androginy is much more widely excepted and American Indians would give these people titles such as shamen (who where men who had female characteristics) these people where praised for there wisdom as they could relate to both genders and where seen as being in balance with nature. Also since men and women are almost genetically the same and since we all start out gender neutral could it be possible that the genders would be indestiguishable if indiviuals where allowed to follow there own path without the restraint of gender norms.

I guess thats some things I have been thinking about allot since entering into the community. I guess one could say I believe in gender neutrality where regarless of sex people can simply be what ever they wish free of judgement and shame. I imagine in world ruled by female supremacist a little girl being told to "woman up" or there mother will not love them anymore and no man will ever want them :). No because I say I believe this oday does not mean I will believe this tomarrow. Perhaps I will be swayed through discussions that the female supremacist point of view is right. In order for change to happen people must be open, honest and able to speak freely.

I love women. I really do. I find them fascinating and beautiful and sexy. They have soft skin and smell nice :). Many are more open to people who deleve into different gender roles like I do and even go as far as helping sometimes very zeliously:). I deffinatly think men can learn allot from women. How to express ourselves better (I dont care what people say about it being hard wired that men cant express there emotions) and even if it is remember that the human brain is not fully developed until the early 20's perhaps by not allowng boys to express emotions and the other ways in which they are treated may actually be retarding the brains grouth in certain areas. Perhaps many men would have just as man cross hemisphere nervs as women if we allow to play with our barbies. Dammit! :)

Anyways I would really love to read anyone elses opinions on this subject or the thoughts I voiced above.

respects as always to eh Ma'ams;
john
ps- Sorry about any gramaticle errors as I was going through the site and as a person who enjoys sissification (how many men just cringed yet if a woman wanted to trapes around in ruffle but panties and a french maid outfit who would be bothered by it) I run across this ideology allot so I really felt a need to post this because being new I started to wonder if a Domme could ever wuv me (yeah i know yuck) or I would run them off by asking honest questions so I may have made a few zillion erros cause I am tired and my contacts are already out.