AAkasha -> RE: Boys (9/7/2005 5:37:10 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pollux I read a lot of criticism about male subs here. To me, a lot of it could be lumped into a general category that you might call "immaturity". The qualities that seem to turn off a Domme are the types of things you see in, well, *boys* of a certain age -- social awkwardness, excessive shyness, rudeness, problems controlling sexual impulses, a failure to communicate effectively, not having full awareness of his emotions, feelings, needs, etc. Now, I also notice that many (but certainly not all) Dommes refer to their submissive partners as "boys", and I'm just wondering how these two things are related. Do Dommes call them that because of these negative qualities? Or do the subs act that way because that's what they are called (and maybe believe that's what's expected of them)? Dommes, why do you call your mates/partners/subs/slaves, etc. "boys"? Is it a conscious choice you made? Do you think either your own partners or the pool of available guys in general would respond better if you called them men, or -- maybe more importantly -- if the ones who were clueless thought of themselves as grown-up men? What would it do to the female dominant/male submissive dynamic if both parties stopped using the word "boy"? I guess I see all these threads about the dominant partner not wanting a doormat and variations on that theme, and I just wonder if what the dominants are really craving is not strength, independence, assertiveness, etc., but simple maturity. Curious what both sides think about this... I don't think there is any intentional reasoning behind it. I think saying "My boy usually listens to what I say," sounds more natural than "My man.." Some people don't like to use the terms sub, submissive, slave or "subbie" when they refer to their significant other. If anything I've been careful about the use of the word 'boy' as it might imply underage. I think I use whatever term feels least clumsy at the time. Akasha
|
|
|
|