RE: my right to babytalk

RE: my right to babytalk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

orfunboi -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/8/2008 1:19:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Emperor1956 The OP: "Apparently it does and the last thing I want is to cause offence. " You come on here and whine about how you (and others) are misunderstood and mistreated by the "muggles", you say you don't want to cause offence, yet in your profile you use extremely offensive language. Now go away and play somewhere else. E. What offensive language do you see in her profile? I looked and while I spotted a few typos, I didn't see anything offensive about it.

xxblushesxx -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/8/2008 1:46:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: orfunboi quote: ORIGINAL: Emperor1956 The OP: "Apparently it does and the last thing I want is to cause offence. " You come on here and whine about how you (and others) are misunderstood and mistreated by the "muggles", you say you don't want to cause offence, yet in your profile you use extremely offensive language. Now go away and play somewhere else. E. What offensive language do you see in her profile? I looked and while I spotted a few typos, I didn't see anything offensive about it. If I had to guess it would be the 'f' word in her profile...

laurell3 -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/8/2008 1:50:10 PM)
lol I was just thinking man I doubt he would really be that conservative to worry about someone saying "fuck"....but yeah the language is....in the OP's profile........... "if youre looking for a sissy, fag or transvestite kindly avert your eyes to elsewhere" I'd like to edit my previous post to add, OP you're free to have whatever views you want, I and anyone else here are free to consider you an ignorant fool as well.

RedMagic1 -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/8/2008 2:01:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mavis i have a similar issue with the slash talk camel type thing. my Master prefers i use typing protocols He feels are appropriate learning tools and management for me. i am very aware that using that typing format is VERY uncomfortable for some people to read. i know it detracts from my input. Beth of "Mercnbeth" speaks entirely in the third person and is completely understandable. It is completely possible to write in slashspeak that E/everyone can read, and even enjoy. It just takes focus, and maybe some practice. Just avoid using personal pronouns whenever possible. This paragraph is an example. Was it hard to read?

Owner4SexSlave -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/8/2008 3:12:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 fast reply goo goo gaga? Aileen oh yeah baby, now that's the way to do it...

juliaoceania -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/8/2008 10:46:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subtee FR~ I'm a little bit stunned. She didn't baby talk here, in fact she had enough awareness to understand how it would be received. She labeled the thread so as to give no ambiguity as to the contents. Are you kidding about imposing [our] kink on others? Do you read the threads? There are any number of topics posted daily that some or another of us will find either engaging or outrageous. Why is this one thing judged? I'm not into it, but I do find it hypocritical to suddenly draw a line that must not be crossed, as the TOS have not been violated, to my understanding. Help me understand how suddenly so many are righteous. I have no issue with threads filled with baby talk. At the same time if I am reading a thread about masochism (example of a kink having nothing to do with baby talking) and someone posts a baby talk response to it, well I am probably not going to respond to that person because I prefer well developed syntax when reading others and responding to them. It is my preference. So while I accept others have different communication needs than I do, it does not mean I want to communicate with them. I would skip baby talking threads and posts with baby talk in them. I think that is what the vast majority meant when they spoke of "ignoring". I do not think of that as being hostile.... If someone posts a thread about anal sex, and a baby talker responded with baby talk, would you take that post seriously? I just wouldn't waste my time on it because it wouldn't be up to the level of what I come here for, and that is just as valid as what everyone else comes here for... I hope that made sense without sounding judgmental, because I am all for people doing what fulfills them, and i am just looking for the same for myself.

YourhandMyAss -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/9/2008 10:22:09 PM)
That's the point. most baby talk isnt'legible, or at least not easily. quote: ORIGINAL: NormalOutside As long as the posts you make are legible, you should be able to talk however you want.

CuriousLord -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/9/2008 10:53:32 PM)
You're fine in my book. To others: This individual is not asking for advice nor judgement. He's speaking out against what he sees as being discriminated against. I'm disinterested in telling anyone how to address this, but some of the responses strike me as having been of a skew nature.

Emperor1956 -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/10/2008 12:56:41 AM)
quote: quote: ORIGINAL: Emperor1956 The OP: "Apparently it does and the last thing I want is to cause offence. " You come on here and whine about how you (and others) are misunderstood and mistreated by the "muggles", you say you don't want to cause offence, yet in your profile you use extremely offensive language. Now go away and play somewhere else. E. Orfunboi: What offensive language do you see in her profile? I looked and while I spotted a few typos, I didn't see anything offensive about it. "Fag" referring to homosexual. E

MmeGigs -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/10/2008 4:32:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 It is completely possible to write in slashspeak that E/everyone can read, and even enjoy. That everyone can read, certainly. Whether everyone will enjoy it is another matter. It has gotten a lot more common than it used to be, and I would guess that most people either accept it or don't even notice it anymore. For some people, though, it detracts from the poster's message. They may enjoy your post despite finding the dual capitalization distracting. I'm not saying that people shouldn't use that particular style, just that as with other style choices like role-based capitalization of personal pronouns, referring to oneself in the third person, babytalk, etc., it's going to color the way your message is received by some readers.

DaddyAndCarina -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/10/2008 4:36:22 AM)
Baby talk I belive has its place ... And I can see making a thread dedicated to it, I dont use it but I do have a different way of communicating with Daddy but wouldnt use it in these forums. Mainly because tho I have kinks I would prefer to be read as a somewhat inteligent person ( not meaning those that chose to use that chat type arent) but in middle of a detailed chat here baby talk I think would just be ignored ... Well I would and something potentially informative could be missed ( just for the record I skip the posts with W/we in it as well)

orfunboi -> RE: my right to babytalk (2/11/2008 5:33:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Emperor1956 quote: quote: ORIGINAL: Emperor1956 The OP: "Apparently it does and the last thing I want is to cause offence. " You come on here and whine about how you (and others) are misunderstood and mistreated by the "muggles", you say you don't want to cause offence, yet in your profile you use extremely offensive language. Now go away and play somewhere else. E. Orfunboi: What offensive language do you see in her profile? I looked and while I spotted a few typos, I didn't see anything offensive about it. "Fag" referring to homosexual. E Oh, ok, I see it now. I didn't read the journal the f irst time. Kinda strange that someone would label themselves "trans" and then make a crack like that.

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 6 [7]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125