RE: Wanking fodder (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


lronitulstahp -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/11/2008 2:50:24 PM)

 
quote:

 Did you think I'd actually start a wanking discussion? 
Well...actually...YEAH!!!! i got all ready and honestly, i feel a bit cheated and used...and NOT in a good way....[&o]




Gwynvyd -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/11/2008 8:01:51 PM)

Personaly I have loads of people, male, female, subs, Dom/mes switches.. confused.. you name its... on my faves lists. It is so I can go check back in on thier journal, and profile because I think they are cool. *shrugs*

I dont think every one who saves folks on thier faves list is always out for a shag or something.. some times it is because of good writing.

*shrugs*

Gwyn




domiguy -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/11/2008 8:14:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OmegaG

considering that the majority of the people who end up on my admirers' list have never actually talked to me, I sometimes think that the name should be changed, how can one admire me if they are basing their judgment on a picture of a handful of words on the page?

Did you think I'd actually start a wanking discussion?



Maybe "admirers" are like a collar of consideration...They don't really admire you but they think that given some time and maybe a blow job or ten they just might be able.....What does one do when your collar of consideration is a bit too snug? Can you loosen it by considering to negate the collar of consideration?

Can the sub decide against a collar of consideration or is it only the dom that can retract such a strong consideration?...How much time does the Dom have to spend in considering his sub?...Is there a set amount of time one must ponder? Speaking of pondering...Why do so many Doms in their profile have a pose struck like "The Thinker?" Do subs find this to be a Domly trait?

Admirers are just watching to see when you relationship will dissinigrate...They can be such jagoffs.




subtee -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/11/2008 8:29:11 PM)

quote:

What does one do when your collar of consideration is a bit too snug?


In the above mentioned scenario, the collared of consideration is not able to properly execute the requested, nay, required blow jobs due to acute throatus constrictus, thus he or she is cummar--summarily reduced and demoted to a collar of "I'll think about it." In fact, this tactic is a formality as there is no way in hell he or she will be elevated nor erected  back to his or her previous "swallows maximus"  status, and therefore is no longer considerable...no matter how ample he or she is. It is for the best. Circle of life. Hakuna matata.




girlygurl -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/11/2008 10:51:18 PM)

I was thinking about this thread earlier..... when a guy masturbates... it's wanking right? so for a femail.... are we winking?

just a thought

girly




Lucylastic -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/12/2008 6:54:27 AM)

I lose control of my wink ability and blink a LOT




Aneirin -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/12/2008 10:02:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: girlygurl

I was thinking about this thread earlier..... when a guy masturbates... it's wanking right? so for a femail.... are we winking?

just a thought

girly


Would you not consider the thought that if a male chooses yourself as an object of desire it is in effect a compliment paid to you ?

You are perhaps succeeding in your natural ability to tease ?

Strip all this down to the basics, is it not just nature?




Emperor1956 -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/12/2008 10:09:12 AM)

Random thoughts:

quote:

 girlygurl:  I was thinking about this thread earlier..... when a guy masturbates... it's wanking right? so for a femail.... are we winking?

just a thought

girly



Clearly, its "missturbation", and clearly someone more clever than I came up with that.

ALSO:  Domiguy!  When did they let you off Moderation?  Who let da dogs out, hey?

ALSO:  I was once under a collar of constipation.  No more oatmeal and cheese sandwiches!

E




chamberqueen -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/13/2008 6:10:59 AM)

This topic hit me as funny.  I've got close to 80 admirers, and a handful that have subscribed to my journal.  I tried to email a Dom that subscribed to my journal to see why, since I am a Mistress.  He actually had my email blocked from being able to contact him!  I couldn't figure this one out at all.  (Maybe he just needs some good ideas - ha ha).

I put a rant in one of my journal entries once saying that I am not Internet Viagra.  I don't know how many men have wanted to "serve" me online, did a great job, got off, and never contacted me again.  I have a lot better things to do with my time than to sit around getting men off - though I will admit that once in a while it is good for the soul.  LOL




OmegaG -> RE: Wanking fodder (2/13/2008 7:43:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy


quote:

ORIGINAL: OmegaG

considering that the majority of the people who end up on my admirers' list have never actually talked to me, I sometimes think that the name should be changed, how can one admire me if they are basing their judgment on a picture of a handful of words on the page?

Did you think I'd actually start a wanking discussion?



Maybe "admirers" are like a collar of consideration...They don't really admire you but they think that given some time and maybe a blow job or ten they just might be able.....What does one do when your collar of consideration is a bit too snug? Can you loosen it by considering to negate the collar of consideration?

Can the sub decide against a collar of consideration or is it only the dom that can retract such a strong consideration?...How much time does the Dom have to spend in considering his sub?...Is there a set amount of time one must ponder? Speaking of pondering...Why do so many Doms in their profile have a pose struck like "The Thinker?" Do subs find this to be a Domly trait?

Admirers are just watching to see when you relationship will dissinigrate...They can be such jagoffs.


If you want a serious answer to what the collar of consideration is in this individual case, I will be happy to comply.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125