Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


TheKingofKings -> Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 8:46:49 AM)

Is it me, or does something new about 9/11 occur almost every day?  If you believe as I do, then you agree that 9/11 was merely a setup job by the US government.  I do have proof.

Also.  When it comes to religion, why does it seem that all religions have a common path?  If you say it's because they all derive from Christianity, i'll kick you in the shin.  All religion did not derive from Christianity, because Christ, one, was a fictional character and, two, there were deities around up to 3000 years before Christ that had the EXACT same story.




luckydog1 -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 8:48:48 AM)

Its probably just you.  Want to share your "proof"?




Alumbrado -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 8:50:09 AM)

You can't handle the proof...[:D]




TheKingofKings -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 8:50:37 AM)

Number one.  The core columns in the WTC towers were cut before the plane hit it.  Number two.  There were bombs set off in the towers as it was "collapsing".  Better yet.  www.zeitgeist.com
Watch that movie.  It'll explain all of my theories




Shawn1066 -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 8:58:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheKingofKings
All religion did not derive from Christianity, because Christ, one, was a fictional character and, two, there were deities around up to 3000 years before Christ that had the EXACT same story.


OK, I could understand you saying Christ isn't divine...that can be a strong argument...but to say he's a fictional character?  There's tons of evidence that proves he was indeed a real person.

Here's a little article that you may find interesting:

http://protestantism.suite101.com/article.cfm/proving_jesus




kittinSol -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 8:58:43 AM)

There we go, again... [8|] .




mnottertail -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:03:40 AM)

Does Real0ne know about this?

I wonder.

Ron




luckydog1 -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:04:10 AM)

Yep it sure does.  So your proof is a crappy web movie....




softness -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:06:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheKingofKings
All religion did not derive from Christianity, because Christ, one, was a fictional character and, two, there were deities around up to 3000 years before Christ that had the EXACT same story.


Christ was not fictional, divine questionable, but real yes.

The reason Christianity has close resemblance to older religions is because when the Roman noble classes converted to Christianty at the behest of the Emperor Constantine there was a conscious effort made to include a)their household gods. b)the practices and rituals they were used to perfroming  (ditto festival dates etc) and c) to remove the varied religions of the slave population would have resulted in the butchery or Rome almost over night. The Cult of Isis (one of the most powerful and widespread cults at the time) was assimilated into what Catholics now practie as reverence to the Virgin Mary

None of the above is particulalry ground breaking. Its just called being informed.




Shawn1066 -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:10:00 AM)

And also because it's an offshoot of Judaism.  Christ was circumsized, after all.  Now, I -highly- doubt they ever -really- had his foreskin as a relic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Prepuce

DV's Fox




luckydog1 -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:10:14 AM)

So there is no new insight at all, just refernce to an old (crappy movie)?  What a rip off, I thought there was a new wacky theory I could examine.  Just a rehash of the old discredited ones...you dissapoint me kings.




kittinSol -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:10:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Does Real0ne know about this?

I wonder.

Ron


With his flair for sniffing out conspiracy threads, he'll be here soon enough [:D] .




mnottertail -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:12:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shawn1066

And also because it's an offshoot of Judaism.  Christ was circumsized, after all.  Now, I -highly- doubt they ever -really- had his foreskin as a relic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Prepuce

DV's Fox


It does beg the question who owns Rasputin's dick nowadays, so plenty of penis parts still scattered throughout the globe.

Armand Hammer




philosophy -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:17:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shawn1066

And also because it's an offshoot of Judaism.  Christ was circumsized, after all.  Now, I -highly- doubt they ever -really- had his foreskin as a relic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Prepuce

DV's Fox


It does beg the question who owns Rasputin's dick nowadays, so plenty of penis parts still scattered throughout the globe.

Armand Hammer


...apparently Napoleon, once dead, had his nadger removed for...ahem....medical reasons........

Obscuricus Maximus




mnottertail -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:22:40 AM)

see? dicks aplenty.

Senor Wencas




LadyEllen -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 9:23:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: softness


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheKingofKings
All religion did not derive from Christianity, because Christ, one, was a fictional character and, two, there were deities around up to 3000 years before Christ that had the EXACT same story.


Christ was not fictional, divine questionable, but real yes.

The reason Christianity has close resemblance to older religions is because when the Roman noble classes converted to Christianty at the behest of the Emperor Constantine there was a conscious effort made to include a)their household gods. b)the practices and rituals they were used to perfroming  (ditto festival dates etc) and c) to remove the varied religions of the slave population would have resulted in the butchery or Rome almost over night. The Cult of Isis (one of the most powerful and widespread cults at the time) was assimilated into what Catholics now practie as reverence to the Virgin Mary

None of the above is particulalry ground breaking. Its just called being informed.


It goes much further than stealing festivals and outer trappings

The story of the dying and rising God-man is as old as recorded history itself, and was found all over for centuries before Jesus. The similarities with the story of Jesus are not just frequent or circumstantial either - the Jesus story is directly drawn from the other dying and rising God-man religions with themes, characters, motifs etc found alike across all those religions.

Christianity is merely the Judaic form of these religions. As such not a problem - the problem is in its insistence that it is unique, which it isnt, and which insistence led to persecution and despicable violence and vandalism.

E




kittinSol -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 10:11:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

see? dicks aplenty.

Senor Wencas


I don't see why you're trying to turn this thread into a total cock-up.




trappedinamuseum -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 11:20:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheKingofKings

Is it me, or does something new about 9/11 occur almost every day?  If you believe as I do, then you agree that 9/11 was merely a setup job by the US government.  I do have proof.

Also.  When it comes to religion, why does it seem that all religions have a common path?  If you say it's because they all derive from Christianity, i'll kick you in the shin.  All religion did not derive from Christianity, because Christ, one, was a fictional character and, two, there were deities around up to 3000 years before Christ that had the EXACT same story.


Read "Searching for Zarathustra".  Maybe then you won't be such a bonehead.




domiguy -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 11:26:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheKingofKings

Number one.  The core columns in the WTC towers were cut before the plane hit it.  Number two.  There were bombs set off in the towers as it was "collapsing".  Better yet.  www.zeitgeist.com
Watch that movie.  It'll explain all of my theories



Christ was born, lived and died.

I like the part where you say it will "explain all of my theories"....lol. Your theories?

You forgot to mention all of the other theories that you developed once you successfully completed...."In Search of Ancient Astronauts"




Jeffff -> RE: Religion and 9/11. Touchy subjects yes, but new insight into them (2/12/2008 11:30:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shawn1066

And also because it's an offshoot of Judaism.  Christ was circumsized, after all.  Now, I -highly- doubt they ever -really- had his foreskin as a relic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Prepuce

DV's Fox


It does beg the question who owns Rasputin's dick nowadays, so plenty of penis parts still scattered throughout the globe.

Armand Hammer


As the owner of Jayne Mansfileds head.........if I could get ahold of Rasputins dick and put it in her mouth....now THERE is a sideshow!

P.T. Barnum




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875