Non-consensual play

Non-consensual play (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

Paul1974 -> Non-consensual play (9/12/2005 6:15:17 PM)
Hi all was looking for some information on non-consensual forms of play. I find it a difficult area as it truly wouldn't be non-consensual with a submissivew who has consented to this, more like consensual non-consensual play. It is an area that has been brought to my attention by my submissive as an area she would enjoy exploring. This may be considered a form of topping from the bottom so to speak but our relationship is quite open on the ability to make requests, and this is simply one of them. Any related posts or opinions on this would be greatly appreciated so as to fully understand the topic. Cheers Paul

Phoenixandnika -> RE: Non-consensual play (9/12/2005 6:19:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Paul1974 Hi all was looking for some information on non-consensual forms of play. I find it a difficult area as it truly wouldn't be non-consensual with a submissivew who has consented to this, more like consensual non-consensual play. It is an area that has been brought to my attention by my submissive as an area she would enjoy exploring. This may be considered a form of topping from the bottom so to speak but our relationship is quite open on the ability to make requests, and this is simply one of them. Any related posts or opinions on this would be greatly appreciated so as to fully understand the topic. Cheers Paul Greetings, There are many who conscent to nonconscent. This simply means that we conscent to what everour Owners deem approriatefor us or them. There are many things that I do wish to do and do not openly conscent todo but as His I have to trust that he will NEVER do anything to harm me emotionally or physically. I am not sure if this is what you mean.

Sub03 -> RE: Non-consensual play (9/12/2005 9:17:59 PM)
Play rape is a form of noncensual play. Consensual nonconsensual sex that is acted out as a rape.

Phoenixandnika -> RE: Non-consensual play (9/13/2005 2:32:48 AM)
Greetings, I know Mine has already replied to this, but I wanted to add some things. Non-consent, play-rape, however you wish to call it, can not only be fun, but stimulating. depending on how much both partners get into the scene, the heart can race and emotions can swing. I was a voyeur to resistance play and found that even on the outside, I was excited. Everything from knife play, to bondage, to ...well lol, an accidental kick from sub to Dom in the head. but overall, I saw the range of emotions, and not just the 'fear' but the softness as well. It is important I feel that throughout a scene like that, to make sure that the Dom/Domme take time out to ensure Their partner is ok. Maintaining closeness throughout the scene, not only accomplishes this, but raises emotional heights. I hope this has helped, and I wish you well. Phoenix.

wantinaSireorSir -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/3/2005 6:01:39 AM)
i agree with you

night101owl -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/3/2005 6:09:58 AM)
Any play that involves the provision of a safeword is consensual nonconsent, because it allows the bottom to say "no" without ending the scene. I'd say that just about any kind of BDSM play can therefore be a consensual nonconsent scene. And I would strongly disagree with the characterization that a bottom who expresses an interest in something is "topping from the bottom." Every couple/group determines for themselves how they are going to exchange power, and I expect it would be very rare to find a situation where a submissive gives up hir voice as to communicating outside the scene what ze finds interesting.

Faramir -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/3/2005 7:00:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: night101owl Any play that involves the provision of a safeword is consensual nonconsent, because it allows the bottom to say "no" without ending the scene. I'd say that just about any kind of BDSM play can therefore be a consensual nonconsent scene. That's the exact opposite of how I understand and use the words "consensual non-consent." I use the words to mean that within the larger context of the relationship she consents to my authority, even though she often doesn't consent to my actions at the moment. A safeword or some kind of opt-out would defeat consensual non-consent. The whole point is she doesn't like a lot of what I do - and yet she loves that I do it. Does that make sense? It's sort of paradoxical, but it only works between us if she knows I will do things, by force if required, that sometimes she doesn't want. An example would be her getting mouthy with me and me backhanding her off her feet. At the moment she doesn't consent to it - would never accede to it - and yet within the larger framework and context of the relationship it she desperately needs it. I think a very common variant of consensual non-consent is "only one us needs to be in the mood, and it ain't you." This sort of thing is controversial - you'll have some people wringing their hands over this relationship model, sure that it is abuse cloaked in a type of BDSM vernacular. Others get it.

Gem -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/3/2005 7:29:36 AM)
Brightest Blessings Consetual non-con can be a way of life (give consent once and then never again) or you could do it in scene related things. Consentual non-con scenes can be but are not limited to anything from rape, forced orgy,resitanceplay ( where the "bottom" fights back hard) to busting thru a "hard limit" that before this had been off limits. Non-con is basically where they have given their consent to do or go thru anything you want to do to them, you do not have to check in for consent or negotiate the scene, it is basically the bottom giving the top (using generics here folks use the label that works for you) blanket consent to do whatever. Non-con play is edgy and you should know your partner very very well..nothing like playing non-con with a new person and they have morning after regrets. Use of safewords in my opinion gives the bottom a way out, not using safewords means that they are there for the long haul with no safe outs. Blessed Be Gem

Soulhuntre -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/3/2005 1:21:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Paul1974 Hi all was looking for some information on non-consensual forms of play. I find it a difficult area as it truly wouldn't be non-consensual with a submissivew who has consented to this, more like consensual non-consensual play. I think consensual non-consent is a pretty cool thing personally... and it can indeed be "truely" non-consensual at least for most common definitions of consent. Commonly, consent is assumed to be something that is instantly revokable - the old "no means no" thing. In a consensual non-consent scene this is no longer ture. That means that the even may well occours despite the wishes of the subject - even after they have really revoked consent and they "mean it".

ElektraUkM -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/3/2005 1:42:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Faramir That's the exact opposite of how I understand and use the words "consensual non-consent." I use the words to mean that within the larger context of the relationship she consents to my authority, even though she often doesn't consent to my actions at the moment. A safeword or some kind of opt-out would defeat consensual non-consent. The whole point is she doesn't like a lot of what I do - and yet she loves that I do it. Does that make sense? It's sort of paradoxical, but it only works between us if she knows I will do things, by force if required, that sometimes she doesn't want. That is exactly put, perfectly how I like things in my relationship with Master. ~ Elektra

Faramir -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/4/2005 7:05:43 AM)
What a helluva thing you found someone who fits with you that way Elektra. I feel incredibly blessed that SMS and I met - the already tiny dating pool of "BDSM" gets miniscule when you are talking about a consensual non-consent framework for the entire relationship. It's my impression that a sort of episodic dynamic that touches close to c/n-c is not all that uncommon - plenty of people want a force scene, rape scene, etc. Being "made" to do a given kink is not the same though as having an entire relationship framework where you have surrendered the right to give consent to what is done to you, or you are forced to do.

IronBear -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/4/2005 7:48:32 AM)
In reality, consensual/nonconsensual relationship is what a Gorean Master has with his kajira. No limits.. No safe words.

fastlane -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/4/2005 7:55:34 AM)
It's an Oximoron.....consentual/non-consentual....Like No means yes....or Military intelligence I agree to disagree

firefighteremt -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/4/2005 11:33:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Faramir quote: ORIGINAL: night101owl Any play that involves the provision of a safeword is consensual nonconsent, because it allows the bottom to say "no" without ending the scene. I'd say that just about any kind of BDSM play can therefore be a consensual nonconsent scene. That's the exact opposite of how I understand and use the words "consensual non-consent." I use the words to mean that within the larger context of the relationship she consents to my authority, even though she often doesn't consent to my actions at the moment. A safeword or some kind of opt-out would defeat consensual non-consent. The whole point is she doesn't like a lot of what I do - and yet she loves that I do it. Does that make sense? It's sort of paradoxical, but it only works between us if she knows I will do things, by force if required, that sometimes she doesn't want. An example would be her getting mouthy with me and me backhanding her off her feet. At the moment she doesn't consent to it - would never accede to it - and yet within the larger framework and context of the relationship it she desperately needs it. I think a very common variant of consensual non-consent is "only one us needs to be in the mood, and it ain't you." This sort of thing is controversial - you'll have some people wringing their hands over this relationship model, sure that it is abuse cloaked in a type of BDSM vernacular. Others get it. That is exactly how I understand it too. Its something that at the time she would never want...but in the context of our relationship its something that she very much wants and needs. I guess its kind of hard to explain if its something you've never had though

candigirlll -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/15/2005 4:46:05 AM)
no in reality there is really no Gor Masters and lil Kajira's will never serve paga lol... in reality what people confuse Gor with is old Guard.. which is much the same no safe words...con/non con between Master and slave....PEOPLE!!!Gor is a make believe planet....YOU ARE NOT A GOR MASTER!!!!!

candigirlll -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/15/2005 4:51:21 AM)
oh all slave girls have limits indeed Sir.... we just dont always know what they are untill our Master tells us lol~~~

pastplayingames -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/15/2005 5:16:26 AM)
quote: Being "made" to do a given kink is not the same though as having an entire relationship framework where you have surrendered the right to give consent to what is done to you, or you are forced to do. Faramir, Recently had a few conversations about this very topic. This was a poignant comment made in the course of one of those discussions about relationships: Consent given as license is still consent. Simply because there is no actual negotiation of a specific event, does not make it non-consentual. (I value his wisdom, among other things s.) This is what I thought of when you wrote: 'relationship framework where you have surrendered the right to give consent to what is done to you'. ~Christine

JohnWarren -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/15/2005 5:35:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: candigirlll no in reality there is really no Gor Masters and lil Kajira's will never serve paga lol... in reality what people confuse Gor with is old Guard.. which is much the same no safe words...con/non con between Master and slave....PEOPLE!!!Gor is a make believe planet....YOU ARE NOT A GOR MASTER!!!!! One distinct difference between Old Guard and Gor is that the Old Guard was exclusively gay.

krys -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/15/2005 5:48:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: candigirlll no in reality there is really no Gor Masters and lil Kajira's will never serve paga lol... in reality what people confuse Gor with is old Guard.. which is much the same no safe words...con/non con between Master and slave....PEOPLE!!!Gor is a make believe planet....YOU ARE NOT A GOR MASTER!!!!! The gay leather community and a lifestyle based on a belief of natural male dominance/female submission are the same because they have formality, a lack of safewords and total consent in common? That's like saying someone is confusing a turkey and a chicken because they both have feathers. Contrary to popular belief, people that live a Gorean lifestyle in the real world are not under the deluded impression that we live on another planet. I will chalk up your rude, vicious, inappropriate little outburst to the obvious ignorance on which it is based. It seems what is confused here is online roleplay Gor with people living by a Gorean philosophy in the real world.

candigirlll -> RE: Non-consensual play (10/15/2005 6:12:16 AM)
This is true but i am speaking of how the Old Guard ways were adopted into other house holds as far as the strictness...

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125